Remember when Trump was attacking NATO? Thank your lucky stars he was fired.

[whutTHEYsay]

OH? You want to troll now?

The point was Ukraine did nothing to threaten a superpower that required that superpower to think it needed to be ruling in Ukraine ever.

Are you aware of an impending attack on the Russian Federation by Ukraine in the days leading up to February 24 2022

 

[whutTHEYsay]

Putin is a war criminal?

That makes Hillary, Bill, Bush, & Obama war criminals too.

Bush 43 is a war criminal like Putin for ordering regime change based on lies.

Hillary was never President Bill and Obama never ordered a regime change on a non-threatening regime.

 

[gipper]

The point was Ukraine did nothing to threaten a superpower that required that superpower to think it needed to be ruling in Ukraine ever.

 

[gipper]

As soon as members of the forum start claiming that Putin is a "madman," and is purposely causing "genocide?"

I think we are done.

You’d think they’d learn from history. This is the same war hysteria/propaganda that has ginned up nations for millennia. It’s really disappointing that Americans continue to fall for this shit. It makes me sick.

 

[gipper]

Bush 43 is a war criminal like Putin for ordering regime change based on lies.

Hillary was never President Bill and Obama never ordered a regime change on a non-threatening regime.

What? Dude you know nothing.

O and Hill did regime change in Libya. They tried the same in Syria, causing immense death and destruction. O supported the Saudi genocide in Yemen. He killed numerous people by drone including US citizens. He overturned habeas corpus, expanded the Patriot Act, and other nefarious shit. Committed a coup in Ukraine, but you know that.

 

[whutTHEYsay]

This is the same war hysteria/propaganda that has ginned up nations for millennia. It’s really disappointing that Americans continue to fall for this shit.

Was Hitler a madman? Did he commit genocide? Did Winston Churchill gin up hysteria over nothing?

 

[Wyatt earp]

Bush 43 is a war criminal like Putin for ordering regime change based on lies.

Hillary was never President Bill and Obama never ordered a regime change on a non-threatening regime.

No lies, Saddam told the CIA on his death bed he was bluffing and the US found WMDs in Iraq

 

[Wyatt earp]

Bush 43 is a war criminal like Putin for ordering regime change based on lies.

Hillary was never President Bill and Obama never ordered a regime change on a non-threatening regime.

Hillary was secretary of state and fellow Democrats almost committed treason to try to stop the war in Libya

 

[whutTHEYsay]

O and Hill did regime change in Libya.

Actually he did not. The United Nations ordered Gadaffi to stop bombing and shelling Benghazi. Gadaffi defied the UN. the French Fighters went in and took out the tanks. Great job UN,

You have a great affinity for dictators committing genocide and can’t be bothered to stop it if we can.

 

[whutTHEYsay]

the US found WMDs in Iraq

Are you calling Bush and DJT Liars. Bush admitted we didnt find them and DJT says Bush lied when he claimed they were there.,

 

[whutTHEYsay]

Saddam told the CIA on his death bed he was bluffing

Thats impossible because SH stopped bluffing in December 2002. That is four months prior to W’s decision to invade.

Even Fox News reported the end of the Bluff.

But Mr Bush admits that he was shocked when no weapons of mass destruction were found in Iraq. "No one was more shocked and angry than I was when we didn't find the weapons," he writes.

George W Bush had 'sickening feeling' over WMD lack

"I had a sickening feeling every time I thought about it. I still do."

!!!!!!!!!!!!!! AFTER !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Saddam Extends Invite to CIA Sunday , December 22, 2002 WASHINGTON —

Saddam Hussein's adviser Amir al-Saadi on Sunday invited t in he CIA to send its agents to Iraq to point out to U.N. inspectors sites the Bush administration suspects of weapons development.

Al-Saadi also said during a news conference in Baghdad that Iraq was prepared to answer any questions raised by the United States and Britain.

"We are ready to deal with each of those questions if you ask us," he said.


Saddam Extends Invite to CIA
By | Fox News

WASHINGTON – Saddam Hussein's adviser Amir al-Saadi on Sunday invited the CIA to send its agents to Iraq to point out to U.N. inspectors sites the Bush administration suspects of weapons development

 

[Wyatt earp]

Are you calling Bush and DJT Liars. Bush admitted we didnt find them and DJT says Bush lied when he claimed they were there.,

I trust US troops who were there on the ground and got hurt by them over anyone else

U.S. troops found nearly 5,000 abandoned chemical weapons in Iraq from 2004 to 2011: report

American troops found nearly 5,000 abandoned chemical weapons in Iraq from 2004 to 2011, but their discoveries were kept secret by the U.S. government, the New York Times reports.

news.yahoo.com

 

[Wyatt earp]

Thats impossible because SH stopped bluffing in December 2002. That is four months prior to W’s decision to invade.

Even Fox News reported the end of the Bluff.

But Mr Bush admits that he was shocked when no weapons of mass destruction were found in Iraq. "No one was more shocked and angry than I was when we didn't find the weapons," he writes.

George W Bush had 'sickening feeling' over WMD lack

"I had a sickening feeling every time I thought about it. I still do."

!!!!!!!!!!!!!! AFTER !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Saddam Extends Invite to CIA Sunday , December 22, 2002 WASHINGTON —

Saddam Hussein's adviser Amir al-Saadi on Sunday invited t in he CIA to send its agents to Iraq to point out to U.N. inspectors sites the Bush administration suspects of weapons development.

Al-Saadi also said during a news conference in Baghdad that Iraq was prepared to answer any questions raised by the United States and Britain.

"We are ready to deal with each of those questions if you ask us," he said.

Wrong, it was on Saddam's death bed

US ‘got it wrong‘ about Saddam Hussein — CIA interrogator

John Nixon says interviews with ex-Iraqi dictator ‘turned assumptions upside down,‘ claims Bush heard ‘only what he wanted to hear‘

www.timesofisrael.com

 

[whutTHEYsay]

I trust US troops who were there on the ground and got hurt by them over anyone else

you were duped in 2003, Why are you so easily duped again in 2014?

All had been manufactured before 1991, participants said. Filthy, rusty or corroded, a large fraction of them could not be readily identified as chemical weapons at all


The United States had gone to war declaring it must destroy an active weapons of mass destruction program. Instead, American troops gradually found and ultimately suffered from the remnants of long-abandoned programs, built in close collaboration with the West.

The Secret Casualties of Iraq’s Abandoned Chemical Weapons (Published 2014)

The discoveries of these chemical weapons did not support the government’s invasion rationale.

After the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, Mr. Bush insisted that Mr. Hussein was hiding an active weapons of mass destruction program, in defiance of international will and at the world’s risk. United Nations inspectors said they could not find evidence for these claims.

Then, during the long occupation, American troops began encountering old chemical munitions in hidden caches and roadside bombs. Typically 155-millimeter artillery shells or 122-millimeter rockets, they were remnants of an arms program Iraq had rushed into production in the 1980s during the Iran-Iraq war.

All had been manufactured before 1991, participants said. Filthy, rusty or corroded, a large fraction of them could not be readily identified as chemical weapons at all. Some were empty, though many of them still contained potent mustard agent or residual sarin. Most could not have been used as designed, and when they ruptured dispersed the chemical agents over a limited area, according to those who collected the majority of them.

In case after case, participants said, analysis of these warheads and shells reaffirmed intelligence failures. First, the American government did not find what it had been looking for at the war’s outset, then it failed to prepare its troops and medical corps for the aged weapons it did find

 

[Wyatt earp]

you were duped in 2003, Why are you so easily duped again in 2014?

All had been manufactured before 1991, participants said. Filthy, rusty or corroded, a large fraction of them could not be readily identified as chemical weapons at all


The United States had gone to war declaring it must destroy an active weapons of mass destruction program. Instead, American troops gradually found and ultimately suffered from the remnants of long-abandoned programs, built in close collaboration with the West.

The Secret Casualties of Iraq’s Abandoned Chemical Weapons (Published 2014)

The discoveries of these chemical weapons did not support the government’s invasion rationale.

After the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, Mr. Bush insisted that Mr. Hussein was hiding an active weapons of mass destruction program, in defiance of international will and at the world’s risk. United Nations inspectors said they could not find evidence for these claims.

Then, during the long occupation, American troops began encountering old chemical munitions in hidden caches and roadside bombs. Typically 155-millimeter artillery shells or 122-millimeter rockets, they were remnants of an arms program Iraq had rushed into production in the 1980s during the Iran-Iraq war.

All had been manufactured before 1991, participants said. Filthy, rusty or corroded, a large fraction of them could not be readily identified as chemical weapons at all. Some were empty, though many of them still contained potent mustard agent or residual sarin. Most could not have been used as designed, and when they ruptured dispersed the chemical agents over a limited area, according to those who collected the majority of them.

In case after case, participants said, analysis of these warheads and shells reaffirmed intelligence failures. First, the American government did not find what it had been looking for at the war’s outset, then it failed to prepare its troops and medical corps for the aged weapons it did find

And?



So will you please stop with the myth WMDs were not found?


It makes the left look stupid

 

[whutTHEYsay]

Wrong, it was on Saddam's death bed

Read your link. Friggin dope.

The FBI agent( Nixon ) who interviewed Saddam Hussein calls Bush an asshole. From your link:


Hussein was executed in 2006. A year later, Nixon was summoned to see President Bush.

“As I was leaving, he joked: ‘You sure Saddam didn’t say where he put those vials of anthrax?’ Everyone laughed, but I thought his crack inappropriate. America had lost more than 4,000 troops.”

Several months later, Nixon was summoned again to Bush and asked for a briefing on prominent Iraqi Shiite cleric Muqtada al-Sadr, for which the analyst was unprepared.

Trying to play for time, Nixon said “‘Well, that is the $64,000 question.’ Bush looked at me and said: ‘Why don’t you make it the $74,000 question, or whatever your salary is, and answer? What an a**hole!'”

 

[whutTHEYsay]

So will you please stop with the myth WMDs were not found?

Your link even says those were not the WMD that we were looking for he got 5000 US troops killed for.

They were all rusted out crap from the 1980s for god sake. What makes people like you so stupid?

 

[whutTHEYsay]

So will you please stop with the myth WMDs were not found?

here is why Bush admits we found no WMD in IRAQ.


All had been manufactured before 1991, participants said. Filthy, rusty or corroded, a large fraction of them could not be readily identified as chemical weapons at all. Some were empty, though many of them still contained potent mustard agent or residual sarin. Most could not have been used as designed, and when they ruptured dispersed the chemical agents over a limited area, according to those who collected the majority of them.

In case after case, participants said, analysis of these warheads and shells reaffirmed intelligence failures. First, the American government did not find what it had been looking for at the war’s outset, then it failed to prepare its troops and medical corps for the aged weapons it did find

 

[Wyatt earp]

Your link even says those were not the WMD that we were looking for he got 5000 US troops killed for.

They were all rusted out crap from the 1980s for god sake. What makes people like you so stupid?

Why are you saying I am stupid when you even acknowledge the WMDs and US troops got hurt by them?

And once again Saddam told the CIA he was bluffing

 

[Wyatt earp]

here is why Bush admits we found no WMD in IRAQ.


All had been manufactured before 1991, participants said. Filthy, rusty or corroded, a large fraction of them could not be readily identified as chemical weapons at all. Some were empty, though many of them still contained potent mustard agent or residual sarin. Most could not have been used as designed, and when they ruptured dispersed the chemical agents over a limited area, according to those who collected the majority of them.

In case after case, participants said, analysis of these warheads and shells reaffirmed intelligence failures. First, the American government did not find what it had been looking for at the war’s outset, then it failed to prepare its troops and medical corps for the aged weapons it did find

You just admitted Iraq had WMDs



.