Thoughts on the Iran invasion.

Raynine

Diamond Member
Joined
Oct 28, 2023
Messages
1,149
Reaction score
1,793
Points
1,938
I have been thinking about Donald Trump’s attack on Iran to save to save European cities like Paris, London, Berlin, Rome, Amsterdam, Brussels, Copenhagen etc. that are already within range of its current missile technology. Iran has already demonstrated that it will attack anyone not supporting it as it has sent missiles into other Arab countries. I recall history and realize that this is not new. I was only 14 when Fidel Castro invited the USSR to install nuclear missiles in Cuba just 90 miles from Florida. JFK had tried to invade dangerous Cuba in 1961 but US politics vetoed air support which caused the invasion to fail.

After the bizarre breakdown of tactical coherence on the part of US leadership that brought about the ill-fated invasion, Fidel Castro aimed nuclear tipped missiles at US cities across the country in 1962. Those missiles could easily have dropped atomic bombs on any city in the US and ended it with scorched earth.

John f. Kennedy’s standoff with the USSR threatening atomic retaliation against Russia resulted in the removal of that missile technology but incredibly it was decided not to invade Cuba and let it just sit there as a continuing strategic threat to the US while its communist dictatorship oppressed Cuban citizens. Essentially, US leadership allowed a little Soviet Union to exist right off our shores for reasons that have never been logically explained.

Allowing an enemy country that attempted to bring about the destruction of America by killing every man, woman, and child with atomic bombs was somehow normalized by US leadership and it is still there. The psychological normalization of a real and present danger stuck and Cuba is still there. Kennedy was eventually erased with an assassination, so the uncomfortable deadly absurdity of leadership ineptitude ended with acceptance.

History does not repeat, but it sometimes rhymes in ways that could result in similar circumstances. The American press has devolved into a propaganda platform for US leadership and targeted delusional hatred of Trump has been inflicted on about half the population. So, Trump is not seen as a man trying to head off a vile rise of hateful, catastrophic danger, he is presented as causing it. Iran’s pursuit of nuclear weapons is a danger far beyond Cuba’s because it has a stranglehold on global energy supplies.

Trump’s war is not really against Iran, it against some of our leadership.
 
I have been thinking about Donald Trump’s attack on Iran to save to save European cities like Paris, London, Berlin, Rome, Amsterdam, Brussels, Copenhagen etc.

b914cb4d8727e6aaa668dd1bf1304b12.jpg
 
I have been thinking about Donald Trump’s attack on Iran to save to save European cities like Paris, London, Berlin, Rome, Amsterdam, Brussels, Copenhagen etc. that are already within range of its current missile technology. Iran has already demonstrated that it will attack anyone not supporting it as it has sent missiles into other Arab countries. I recall history and realize that this is not new. I was only 14 when Fidel Castro invited the USSR to install nuclear missiles in Cuba just 90 miles from Florida. JFK had tried to invade dangerous Cuba in 1961 but US politics vetoed air support which caused the invasion to fail.

After the bizarre breakdown of tactical coherence on the part of US leadership that brought about the ill-fated invasion, Fidel Castro aimed nuclear tipped missiles at US cities across the country in 1962. Those missiles could easily have dropped atomic bombs on any city in the US and ended it with scorched earth.

John f. Kennedy’s standoff with the USSR threatening atomic retaliation against Russia resulted in the removal of that missile technology but incredibly it was decided not to invade Cuba and let it just sit there as a continuing strategic threat to the US while its communist dictatorship oppressed Cuban citizens. Essentially, US leadership allowed a little Soviet Union to exist right off our shores for reasons that have never been logically explained.

Allowing an enemy country that attempted to bring about the destruction of America by killing every man, woman, and child with atomic bombs was somehow normalized by US leadership and it is still there. The psychological normalization of a real and present danger stuck and Cuba is still there. Kennedy was eventually erased with an assassination, so the uncomfortable deadly absurdity of leadership ineptitude ended with acceptance.

History does not repeat, but it sometimes rhymes in ways that could result in similar circumstances. The American press has devolved into a propaganda platform for US leadership and targeted delusional hatred of Trump has been inflicted on about half the population. So, Trump is not seen as a man trying to head off a vile rise of hateful, catastrophic danger, he is presented as causing it. Iran’s pursuit of nuclear weapons is a danger far beyond Cuba’s because it has a stranglehold on global energy supplies.

Trump’s war is not really against Iran, it against some of our leadership.

gaslight bullshit.gif


Iran does not support terrorism. Iran support groups in the Middle East trying to stop the Jews from taking over their land. Iran's missile program is not to take over the world. They use them for defensive purposes, you filthy lying sack of MAGA shit!

Palestine shrinking.gif
 
Trump is doing to Iran what the US should have done to Cuba sixty-plus years ago. Instead it allowed the USSR to extort a deal not to invade. How has that worked out for Cuba? Great according to millionaire Bernie Sanders.
 
I have been thinking about Donald Trump’s attack on Iran to save to save European cities like Paris, London, Berlin, Rome, Amsterdam, Brussels, Copenhagen etc. that are already within range of its current missile technology. Iran has already demonstrated that it will attack anyone not supporting it as it has sent missiles into other Arab countries. I recall history and realize that this is not new. I was only 14 when Fidel Castro invited the USSR to install nuclear missiles in Cuba just 90 miles from Florida. JFK had tried to invade dangerous Cuba in 1961 but US politics vetoed air support which caused the invasion to fail.

After the bizarre breakdown of tactical coherence on the part of US leadership that brought about the ill-fated invasion, Fidel Castro aimed nuclear tipped missiles at US cities across the country in 1962. Those missiles could easily have dropped atomic bombs on any city in the US and ended it with scorched earth.

John f. Kennedy’s standoff with the USSR threatening atomic retaliation against Russia resulted in the removal of that missile technology but incredibly it was decided not to invade Cuba and let it just sit there as a continuing strategic threat to the US while its communist dictatorship oppressed Cuban citizens. Essentially, US leadership allowed a little Soviet Union to exist right off our shores for reasons that have never been logically explained.

Allowing an enemy country that attempted to bring about the destruction of America by killing every man, woman, and child with atomic bombs was somehow normalized by US leadership and it is still there. The psychological normalization of a real and present danger stuck and Cuba is still there. Kennedy was eventually erased with an assassination, so the uncomfortable deadly absurdity of leadership ineptitude ended with acceptance.

History does not repeat, but it sometimes rhymes in ways that could result in similar circumstances. The American press has devolved into a propaganda platform for US leadership and targeted delusional hatred of Trump has been inflicted on about half the population. So, Trump is not seen as a man trying to head off a vile rise of hateful, catastrophic danger, he is presented as causing it. Iran’s pursuit of nuclear weapons is a danger far beyond Cuba’s because it has a stranglehold on global energy supplies.

Trump’s war is not really against Iran, it against some of our leadership.

There is only ONE thought.

The United States Constitution invests the Power To Make War with the Legislative Branch (Article I Section VIII). The current military action in Iran is Unconstitutional. The Executive Branch can request a Declaration of War, but only the Legislative Branch is vested with the Power To Make War.
 

IF all you've got is Wiki, then you lose. Wiki readers edit the articles they read, putting in or removing whatever information they want.

There was no, "Imminent Threat" from Iran. Iran was NOT, "Months if no weeks away from developing a nuclear bomb." Iran has been at the level of development for over 2-Deades. The Unconstitutional War being wage is at the behest of Netanyhood and MBS. Both men have their own vision of the Middle East after the of Islamic State. Dementia Donnie is being led by the nose by two men who not a shit about U.S. War Dead. Think about that.
 
There was no, "Imminent Threat" from Iran. Iran was NOT, "Months if no weeks away from developing a nuclear bomb." Iran has been at the level of development for over 2-Deades.
So Iran has not been enriching uranium (and building bigger missiles) during the past 20 years? What planet do you live on?
 
I have been thinking about Donald Trump’s attack on Iran to save to save European cities

Keep in mind there has been no actual invasion, just an assault, and that all of this, Iran, Venezuela, Cuba, Panama, Greenland, all of it is really about C H I N A.

It is about cutting off the arms of the chinese monster that Bejing's policies of Sun Tzu aggression have quietly implemented around the globe as a slow incursion into steeling US power and technology away from us while so many in Washington just slept, many comfortably bribed to just keep looking the other way--- maybe even butter a little up for them.

Trump is simply backing America out of the corner that China has been trying to paint us into killing all hopes of China becoming the #1 superpower.

Trump really sucks for those in power in China, Iran, Cuba and elsewhere.
 
To demonstrate how bizarre our leadership was and still is let's use the logic of the Cuban Missile Crisis for the situation in Ukraine. What would happen if the US brought nuclear missiles to Ukraine and told the world they were there for defensive purposes? Then, when Russia threatened us we could broker a deal with them not to invade Ukraine anymore if we took the missiles back. Voila, the end of the war in Ukraine! See? It's the same logic. If it worked before why couldn't it work again? We could establish a litte USA right next to Russia just like the Soviets established a little Russia right next to America!
 
View attachment 1234714

Iran does not support terrorism. Iran support groups in the Middle East trying to stop the Jews from taking over their land. Iran's missile program is not to take over the world. They use them for defensive purposes, you filthy lying sack of MAGA shit!

View attachment 1234718
If Israel really wanted to take over land they could have had very large swaths of it if they had wanted. It is most of the Middle East who denies Israel's right to exist, not the other way around.
 
15th post
Iran’s pursuit of nuclear weapons is a danger far beyond Cuba’s because it has a stranglehold on global energy supplies.

Trump’s war is not really against Iran, it against some of our leadership.

Completely unproven and likely total fabrication.

It is Trumpfys leadership that is questionable -- a charitable term .
His experts all warned him against what he chose unilaterally to do.
Or more accurately -- he and his Zionist cabinet stooges ignored the experts .
 
Still closed. Iran is still shooting missiles. The regime is still intact. The nuclear material is still in their control.
 
I have been thinking about Donald Trump’s attack on Iran to save to save European cities like Paris, London, Berlin, Rome, Amsterdam, Brussels, Copenhagen etc. that are already within range of its current missile technology. Iran has already demonstrated that it will attack anyone not supporting it as it has sent missiles into other Arab countries. I recall history and realize that this is not new. I was only 14 when Fidel Castro invited the USSR to install nuclear missiles in Cuba just 90 miles from Florida. JFK had tried to invade dangerous Cuba in 1961 but US politics vetoed air support which caused the invasion to fail.

After the bizarre breakdown of tactical coherence on the part of US leadership that brought about the ill-fated invasion, Fidel Castro aimed nuclear tipped missiles at US cities across the country in 1962. Those missiles could easily have dropped atomic bombs on any city in the US and ended it with scorched earth.

John f. Kennedy’s standoff with the USSR threatening atomic retaliation against Russia resulted in the removal of that missile technology but incredibly it was decided not to invade Cuba and let it just sit there as a continuing strategic threat to the US while its communist dictatorship oppressed Cuban citizens. Essentially, US leadership allowed a little Soviet Union to exist right off our shores for reasons that have never been logically explained.

Allowing an enemy country that attempted to bring about the destruction of America by killing every man, woman, and child with atomic bombs was somehow normalized by US leadership and it is still there. The psychological normalization of a real and present danger stuck and Cuba is still there. Kennedy was eventually erased with an assassination, so the uncomfortable deadly absurdity of leadership ineptitude ended with acceptance.

History does not repeat, but it sometimes rhymes in ways that could result in similar circumstances. The American press has devolved into a propaganda platform for US leadership and targeted delusional hatred of Trump has been inflicted on about half the population. So, Trump is not seen as a man trying to head off a vile rise of hateful, catastrophic danger, he is presented as causing it. Iran’s pursuit of nuclear weapons is a danger far beyond Cuba’s because it has a stranglehold on global energy supplies.

Trump’s war is not really against Iran, it against some of our leadership.
Revisionism has become the hallmark of Trump's pretexts for being enticed into his "little excursion" with Bibi.

Most Americans are not buying it.


Trump said Monday that previously threatened U.S. strikes on Iranian energy infrastructure would not occur for five days after “productive conversations” with Tehran...
Even amid the alleged talks, the Pentagon is preparing to deploy roughly 2,000 soldiers from the U.S. Army’s 82nd Airborne Division to the Middle East, a source familiar with the matter told The Hill on Tuesday.


It is foolish to trust Iran or Trump.

Let's see what happens.
 
Back
Top Bottom