Rafael Grossi : IAEA chief: No evidence Iran is building a nuclear weapon

Everybody thought Saddam had WMD. He worked very hard convincing even his own generals he had them. In post war interviews all of Saddam's generals said, "my unit didn't have any, but XXX's unit over there had them".
So you like being lied into war. Got it.
 
Well of course they are in "non-compliance" once the US violated the treaties and illegally imposed economic sanctions on Iran.
Economic sanctions violate the 1906 Geneva Conventions we ratified.
Ok, now explain how the IAEA knows anything since you admit they say Iran isn't complying?

This will be a hoot. :auiqs.jpg:
 
Iran ANNOUNCED that it was enriching up to 60% purity

No evidence that 60% purity is weapons grade

What would the purpose be then?


Enriching uranium to 60% purity is a significant step in the process of uranium enrichment, where the concentration of the fissile isotope uranium-235 is increased from its natural level of about 0.7%.
While 60% enriched uranium cannot be used to make a useful nuclear explosive device, it significantly shortens the time required to reach weapons-grade levels (around 90% purity).
This makes 60% enriched uranium a concern from a nuclear proliferation standpoint, as it demonstrates a country's capability to enrich uranium to a level close to weapons-grade.
It's important to note that uranium enriched to 3-5% is typically used for nuclear power plants. 60% enrichment goes far beyond this level.
 
The point is, Saddam had WMD's before the Iraq war

Where did they go?
They were destroyed under the terms of his surrender after the first Gulf War.

Why are you not reading YOUR OWN LINK?

Jesus, man. You are beyond stupid. You have a delusion and not even your own source will break you from it.

You are pathetic.

This is a fantastic demonstration of the stickiness lies have in the minds of the cult.
 
They were destroyed under the terms of his surrender after the first Gulf War.

Why are you not reading YOUR OWN LINK?

Jesus, man. You are beyond stupid. You have a delusion and not even your own source will break you from it.

You are pathetic.

This is a fantastic demonstration of the stickiness lies have in the minds of the cult.
Where is the proof they were destroyed?

You want proof of WMD"s in Iraq when "W" went in, but why not proof the ones once there were destroyed before he went in?

Hmm?
 
Where is the proof they were destroyed?
The fact none were found after the Hussein regime collapsed. And the fact international observers watched their destruction.

Just how dense are you going to continue to be?

You know what made people really sick?

During a White House correspondents dinner, Bush showed a photo of himself looking under a chair and saying, "Those weapons of mass destruction have got to be here somewhere."

Over 4,000 American troops died in his phony war, and he made a joke out of it.


Even your cult leader knows better than you do:

TRUMP: When [Pelosi] first got in and was named speaker, I met her. And I'm very impressed by her. I think she's a very impressive person, I like her a lot. But I was surprised that she didn't do more in terms of Bush and going after Bush . It just seemed like she was really going to look to impeach Bush and get him out of office. Which personally I think would have been a wonderful thing.

BLITZER: To impeach him?

TRUMP: For the war. For the war! Well, he lied! He got us into the war with lies!

TRUMP: I mean, look at the trouble Bill Clinton got into with something that was totally unimportant. And they tried to impeach him, which was nonsense. And yet Bush got us into this horrible war with lies, by lying. By saying they had WMDs, by saying all sorts of things that happened not to be true.
 
The fact none were found after the Hussein regime collapsed.

Just how dense are you going to continue to be?

You know what made people really sick?

During a White House correspondents dinner, Bush showed a photo of himself looking under chair and saying, "Those weapons of mass destruction have got to be here somewhere."

Over 4,000 American troops died in his phony war, and he made a joke out of it.


Even your cult leader knows better than you do:

TRUMP: When [Pelosi] first got in and was named speaker, I met her. And I'm very impressed by her. I think she's a very impressive person, I like her a lot. But I was surprised that she didn't do more in terms of Bush and going after Bush . It just seemed like she was really going to look to impeach Bush and get him out of office. Which personally I think would have been a wonderful thing.

BLITZER: To impeach him?

TRUMP: For the war. For the war! Well, he lied! He got us into the war with lies!

TRUMP: I mean, look at the trouble Bill Clinton got into with something that was totally unimportant. And they tried to impeach him, which was nonsense. And yet Bush got us into this horrible war with lies, by lying. By saying they had WMDs, by saying all sorts of things that happened not to be true.

They were smuggling all kinds of stuff out of Iraq idiot, like gold bars

Why would they not do the same with WMD's which are as good as gold?
 

They were smuggling all kinds of stuff out of Iraq idiot, like gold bars

Why would they not do the same with WMD's which are as good as gold?
Um...retard?

Gold is not a WMD.

Unless it is in George Soros's hands, amiright? :lol:
 
Um...retard?

Gold is not a WMD.

Unless it is in George Soros's hands, amiright? :lol:
Do you really think the captured all the gold leaving the country buffoon?

No.

But you are certain no WMD's left either?

:auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg:
 
9y1g25
 
Do you really think the captured all the gold leaving the country buffoon?

No.

But you are certain no WMD's left either?

:auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg:
You have ZERO proof there were WMDs.

Laugh like an idiot all you like, but the burden of proof is on you.

Are your skills as good as international workers and the US armed forces?

Didn't think so.
 
You have ZERO proof there were WMDs.

Laugh like an idiot all you like, but the burden of proof is on you.

Are your skills as good as international workers and the US armed forces?

Didn't think so.
I'm not saying I do know, I'm just pointing out that you don't know either.

All we know is that they had them at one time.

It really is not that hard to understand.
 
The only WMDs in Iraq turned out to be our military's burn pits.
 
IAEA: We have found no evidence of nukes cuz they aren't complying with our inspections.

g5000: SEE! PROOF THEY DON'T HAVE NUKES!!!!!!!!!
 
15th post
The CIA stole their oil wells, the navy shoots down their CIVILIAN airliners , the CIA installed a puppet president who murdered thousands of Iranians but but but they are supposed to be love us nevertheless
God you are an idiot. "Iran's" oil wells were located, drilled and operated by the British and American companies that spent millions of dollars and pounds on them. Iran stole them without any compensation at all. Shooting down the airliner was an accident because the airliner was flying in a declared no fly zone IN WARTIME and ignored multiple warnings on international frequencies to change course. And finally, in the first six months of their reign, the Mullahs killed more Iranians than the Shah did in thirty-six years, and the Mullahs still maintain their hold on Iran using terror.
 
Last edited:
And what is 60% enriched good for?

Naval reactors. Not nukes
From sixty percent to ninety percent is an easy jump. It is estimated that it will take Iran less than a month to enrich all of its 60% stock to 90%. Enrichment gets vastly easier as the percentage increases because most of the waste is already spun off in the early stages.
 
From sixty percent to ninety percent is an easy jump. It is estimated that it will take Iran less than a month to enrich all of its 60% stock to 90%.
As we've been hearing for well over a decade. :lol:
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom