Rafael Grossi : IAEA chief: No evidence Iran is building a nuclear weapon

Iran ANNOUNCED that it was enriching up to 60% purity

No evidence that 60% purity is weapons grade
And what is 60% enriched good for?

Naval reactors. Not nukes
 
But yet all the UN resolutions are against Israel
O'rly?

List of United Nations Security Council resolutions concerning Iran


There have been more, but Trump and your best friend Putin keeps vetoing them.



Very telling.
Very telling as you continue to expose your ignorance.


North Korea starves their population while at the same time the happiest people in the Middle East are in Israel, and if you wanted to visit the Middle East, you would feel safer and freer in Israel.

Funny that.
I have visited the Middle East as an active duty service member. I felt safe in all of the countries we visited.

Funny that.

I was surprised to learn how pro-Western they are.

In my current job, I work with our allies in the ME and around the world. Our ME customers are all scrambling right now for our services in light of the current escalation of events.
 
So just blow the **** out of a country and walk away
Are you having difficulty reading? For the fourth time - blow up their nuclear capabilities. Not "blow the **** out of a country"
Brilliant
Seems like a decent option. You haven't found fault with it yet.
 
Sadam used WMD's to wipe out the Kurds dimwit.


WRONG!

The US Army War College investigated and found that in Halabja where the Kurds were gassed in 1988, it was cyanide, that only Iran had.
And in fact, in 1988 the Kurds were Saddam's allies against the Iranian attack.

{...
The best evidence to answer this is a 1990 report by the Strategic Studies Institute of the US Army War College. It concluded that Iran, not Iraq, was the culprit in Halabja. While the War College report acknowledges that Iraq used mustard gas during the Halabja hostilities, it notes that mustard gas is an incapacitating, rather than a killing agent, with a fatality rate of only 2%, so that it could not have killed the hundreds of known dead, much less the thousands of dead claimed by Human Rights Watch.

According to the War College reconstruction of events, Iran struck first taking control of the village. The Iraqis counter-attacked using mustard gas. The Iranians then attacked again, this time using a "blood agent" - cyanogens chloride or hydrogen cyanide - and re-took the town, which Iran then held for several months. Having control of the village and its grisly dead, Iran blamed the gas deaths on the Iraqis, and the allegations of Iraqi genocide took root via a credulous international press and, a little later, cynical promotion of the allegations for political purposes by the US state department and Senate.

Stephen Pelletiere, who was the CIA's senior political analyst on Iraq throughout the Iran-Iraq war, closely studied evidences of "genocide in Halabja" has described his group's findings: "The great majority of the victims seen by reporters and other observers who attended the scene were blue in their extremities. That means that they were killed by a blood agent, probably either cyanogens chloride or hydrogen cyanide. Iraq never used and lacked any capacity to produce these chemicals. But the Iranians did deploy them. Therefore the Iranians killed the Kurds."

Pelletiere's report also said that international relief organisations that examined the Kurdish refugees in Turkey failed to discover any gassing victims. After 15 years of support to the allegations of HRW, the CIA finally admitted in its report published in October 2003 that only mustard gas and a nerve agent was used by Iraq. The CIA now seems to be fully supporting the US Army War College report of April 1990, as a cyanide-based blood agent that Iraq never had, and not mustard gas or a nerve agent, killed the Kurds who died at Halabja and which concludes that the Iranians perpetrated that attack as a media war tactic.
...}
What Happened in Kurdish Halabja?
 
Are you having difficulty reading? For the fourth time - blow up their nuclear capabilities. Not "blow the **** out of a country"

Seems like a decent option. You haven't found fault with it yet.
You don’t just blow up a nuke facility.

You blow up their missile bases, their anti missile bases. Their naval bases.

You take out all of their ability to retaliate… because they will

It tends to get really messy
 
WRONG!

The US Army War College investigated and found that in Halabja where the Kurds were gassed in 1988, it was cyanide, that only Iran had.
And in fact, in 1988 the Kurds were Saddam's allies against the Iranian attack.

{...
The best evidence to answer this is a 1990 report by the Strategic Studies Institute of the US Army War College. It concluded that Iran, not Iraq, was the culprit in Halabja. While the War College report acknowledges that Iraq used mustard gas during the Halabja hostilities, it notes that mustard gas is an incapacitating, rather than a killing agent, with a fatality rate of only 2%, so that it could not have killed the hundreds of known dead, much less the thousands of dead claimed by Human Rights Watch.

According to the War College reconstruction of events, Iran struck first taking control of the village. The Iraqis counter-attacked using mustard gas. The Iranians then attacked again, this time using a "blood agent" - cyanogens chloride or hydrogen cyanide - and re-took the town, which Iran then held for several months. Having control of the village and its grisly dead, Iran blamed the gas deaths on the Iraqis, and the allegations of Iraqi genocide took root via a credulous international press and, a little later, cynical promotion of the allegations for political purposes by the US state department and Senate.

Stephen Pelletiere, who was the CIA's senior political analyst on Iraq throughout the Iran-Iraq war, closely studied evidences of "genocide in Halabja" has described his group's findings: "The great majority of the victims seen by reporters and other observers who attended the scene were blue in their extremities. That means that they were killed by a blood agent, probably either cyanogens chloride or hydrogen cyanide. Iraq never used and lacked any capacity to produce these chemicals. But the Iranians did deploy them. Therefore the Iranians killed the Kurds."

Pelletiere's report also said that international relief organisations that examined the Kurdish refugees in Turkey failed to discover any gassing victims. After 15 years of support to the allegations of HRW, the CIA finally admitted in its report published in October 2003 that only mustard gas and a nerve agent was used by Iraq. The CIA now seems to be fully supporting the US Army War College report of April 1990, as a cyanide-based blood agent that Iraq never had, and not mustard gas or a nerve agent, killed the Kurds who died at Halabja and which concludes that the Iranians perpetrated that attack as a media war tactic.
...}
What Happened in Kurdish Halabja?
Well, this is the first I have heard of this.

How many WMD's do you reckon Iran then has?
 
WRONG!

The US Army War College investigated and found that in Halabja where the Kurds were gassed in 1988, it was cyanide, that only Iran had.
And in fact, in 1988 the Kurds were Saddam's allies against the Iranian attack.

{...
The best evidence to answer this is a 1990 report by the Strategic Studies Institute of the US Army War College. It concluded that Iran, not Iraq, was the culprit in Halabja. While the War College report acknowledges that Iraq used mustard gas during the Halabja hostilities, it notes that mustard gas is an incapacitating, rather than a killing agent, with a fatality rate of only 2%, so that it could not have killed the hundreds of known dead, much less the thousands of dead claimed by Human Rights Watch.

According to the War College reconstruction of events, Iran struck first taking control of the village. The Iraqis counter-attacked using mustard gas. The Iranians then attacked again, this time using a "blood agent" - cyanogens chloride or hydrogen cyanide - and re-took the town, which Iran then held for several months. Having control of the village and its grisly dead, Iran blamed the gas deaths on the Iraqis, and the allegations of Iraqi genocide took root via a credulous international press and, a little later, cynical promotion of the allegations for political purposes by the US state department and Senate.

Stephen Pelletiere, who was the CIA's senior political analyst on Iraq throughout the Iran-Iraq war, closely studied evidences of "genocide in Halabja" has described his group's findings: "The great majority of the victims seen by reporters and other observers who attended the scene were blue in their extremities. That means that they were killed by a blood agent, probably either cyanogens chloride or hydrogen cyanide. Iraq never used and lacked any capacity to produce these chemicals. But the Iranians did deploy them. Therefore the Iranians killed the Kurds."

Pelletiere's report also said that international relief organisations that examined the Kurdish refugees in Turkey failed to discover any gassing victims. After 15 years of support to the allegations of HRW, the CIA finally admitted in its report published in October 2003 that only mustard gas and a nerve agent was used by Iraq. The CIA now seems to be fully supporting the US Army War College report of April 1990, as a cyanide-based blood agent that Iraq never had, and not mustard gas or a nerve agent, killed the Kurds who died at Halabja and which concludes that the Iranians perpetrated that attack as a media war tactic.
...}
What Happened in Kurdish Halabja?
Shut up ya Kremlin stooge.

The Kurds were not Saddam’s allies
 
You don’t just blow up a nuke facility.

You blow up their missile bases, their anti missile bases. Their naval bases.

You take out all of their ability to retaliate… because they will

It tends to get really messy
Good plan. You should send that to Trump.
 
You don’t just blow up a nuke facility.
Why not?
You blow up their missile bases, their anti missile bases.
Israel is already taking care of that, out of self defense.
Their naval bases.

You take out all of their ability to retaliate… because they will

It tends to get really messy
Well, you are advocating escalating the **** out of the conflict. Why would you do that?
 
The IAEA inspectors say there is no stockpiles of enriched uranium.
They also say in a just released report that Iran is in non-compliance regarding all this shit.

Do you believe them then, or now? :auiqs.jpg:
 
15th post
What's the danger in blowing the shit out of their nuclear capabilities?
Hmmmm...what could be the consequences of bombing the shit out of Iran, you ask?

Why don't we ask Israel? That is, if they can take time out from dodging missiles...

Hypersonic missiles are stirring fears in the Iran-Israel conflict. Here's why



But in modern warfare, experts say hypersonic weapons must also have advanced navigation systems – making them nimble and capable of changing their trajectory. This can challenge traditional defense systems, said Jack Watling, a senior fellow at the Royal United Services Institute.


Iran has more missiles than Israel has interceptors.

Even worse, Iran is targeting those surface-to-air missile sites in Israel. Denuding the Iron Dome.

If the US gets involved, we have ships in the area which would make tasty targets.
 
Well, this is the first I have heard of this.

How many WMD's do you reckon Iran then has?

Back then Iran had very little convention weapons, so was desperate to try anything, including human wave attacks.

But chemical weapons are actually very impractical.
They cost more and kill fewer people than conventional weapons.
Plus they cause retaliation and contamination on your own troops.

I doubt Iran is still using any WMD since they failed in past use.
 
They also say in a just released report that Iran is in non-compliance regarding all this shit.

Do you believe them then, or now? :auiqs.jpg:

Well of course they are in "non-compliance" once the US violated the treaties and illegally imposed economic sanctions on Iran.
Economic sanctions violate the 1906 Geneva Conventions we ratified.
 
And just like that, the Trump cult does a 180 and becomes neocons.

"Bomb-bomb-bomb, bomb-bomb Iran!"

I guess we should have listened to this "neocon way" back when, eh?

John-Mc-Cain.jpg
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom