Rafael Grossi : IAEA chief: No evidence Iran is building a nuclear weapon

[g5000]

There is no proof that was all of it.

But the point remains, he had them

Ipse dixit.

There is zero proof Hussein had WMDs. We looked high and low for them after he was deposed.

Nothing. No joy.

The link you thought proved your point contradicts you!

And someone else contradicts you, too:

TRUMP: When [Pelosi] first got in and was named speaker, I met her. And I'm very impressed by her. I think she's a very impressive person, I like her a lot. But I was surprised that she didn't do more in terms of Bush and going after Bush . It just seemed like she was really going to look to impeach Bush and get him out of office. Which personally I think would have been a wonderful thing.

BLITZER: To impeach him?

TRUMP: For the war. For the war! Well, he lied! He got us into the war with lies!

TRUMP: I mean, look at the trouble Bill Clinton got into with something that was totally unimportant. And they tried to impeach him, which was nonsense. And yet Bush got us into this horrible war with lies, by lying. By saying they had WMDs, by saying all sorts of things that happened not to be true.


Here's a funny thing. Right up to 2015, rarely would a month go by when a pseudocon would claim Hussein had WMDs. And if WMDs popped up anywhere else, they would claim they came from Hussein.

For example, when Assad used chemical weapons on his people in 2013, sure as shit the pseudocons said he got the WMDs from Hussein, which is funny considering chemicals aren't potent for that long.

But the second, the very second, Donald Trump entered the presidential race, all claims about Hussein's imaginary WMDs came to a screeching halt when Trump repeated the fact there were none in Iraq.

That's when I knew we had a new Orwellian cult on our hands.

 

[Votto]

Ipse dixit.

There is zero proof Hussein had WMDs. We looked high and low for them after he was deposed.

Nothing. No joy.

The link you thought proved your point contradicts you!

And someone else contradicts you, too:

TRUMP: When [Pelosi] first got in and was named speaker, I met her. And I'm very impressed by her. I think she's a very impressive person, I like her a lot. But I was surprised that she didn't do more in terms of Bush and going after Bush . It just seemed like she was really going to look to impeach Bush and get him out of office. Which personally I think would have been a wonderful thing.

BLITZER: To impeach him?

TRUMP: For the war. For the war! Well, he lied! He got us into the war with lies!

TRUMP: I mean, look at the trouble Bill Clinton got into with something that was totally unimportant. And they tried to impeach him, which was nonsense. And yet Bush got us into this horrible war with lies, by lying. By saying they had WMDs, by saying all sorts of things that happened not to be true.


Here's a funny thing. Right up to 2015, rarely would a month go by when a pseudocon would claim Hussein had WMDs. And if WMDs popped up anywhere else, they would claim they came from Hussein.

For example, when Assad used chemical weapons on his people in 2013, sure as shit the pseudocons said he got the WMDs from Hussein, which is funny considering chemicals aren't potent for that long.

But the second, the very second, Donald Trump entered the presidential race, all claims about Hussein's imaginary WMDs came to a screeching halt when Trump repeated the fact there were none in Iraq.

That's when I knew we had a new Orwellian cult on our hands.

Just asking for the proof Saddam had no WMD's when at one time he had them, and the whole loon Left goes insane.

Amazing.

I'm not even arguing "W" lied about his intentions.

After all, he voted for Biden like you.

 

[AZrailwhale]

IAEA chief: No evidence Iran is building a nuclear weapon​

IAEA chief: No evidence Iran is building a nuclear weapon

IAEA says no proof of Iranian nuclear weapons plan, despite Israeli attacks and accusations of IAEA bias from Tehran.

www.aljazeera.com

Rafael Grossi - IAEA Chief

"WE DID NOT FIND IN IRAN ELEMENTS TO INDICATE THAT THERE IS AN ACTIVE SYSTEMATIC PLAN TO BUILD A NUCLEAR PROGRAM"

They want their yellowcake and eat it too

The Uranium Hoax that Triggered the Iraq War​

The Uranium Hoax that Triggered the Iraq War

The Uranium Hoax that Triggered the Iraq War

spyscape.com

This confirms that the CIA - encouraged by Mitch McConnell and Lindsey Graham - created yet another HOAX to destroy the Trump Presidency and the MAGA Movement .

Did you notice how carefully that was phrased? Nothing about Iran enriching uranium to weapons grade levels. just that there is no evidence the Iran is currently building nuclear bombs.

 

[Contumacious]

Um, you just destroyed your won thread, Sport.

Only if you are a naive, gullible LaLaLander .

I fail to see how those documents dont prove that the OPPOSITE is true.

 

[AZrailwhale]

That's exactly what I was thinking. If it's for peaceful purposes, why do it hundreds of feet underground, in a secure facility, to make nuclear fuel for generating stations?

Nuclear fuel that both France and the USA offered to provide as well as reactors to use it and Iran declined both.

 

[g5000]

Just asking for the proof Saddam had no WMD's when at one time he had them

This is a perfect, textbook example of an argument from ignorance!

Argument from ignorance - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

, and the whole loon Left goes insane.

You're saying Trump is insane? Welcome to the club!



TRUMP: For the war. For the war! Well, he lied! He got us into the war with lies!

TRUMP: I mean, look at the trouble Bill Clinton got into with something that was totally unimportant. And they tried to impeach him, which was nonsense. And yet Bush got us into this horrible war with lies, by lying. By saying they had WMDs, by saying all sorts of things that happened not to be true.

Amazing.

Indeed. Your persistence in the face of facts is truly amazing.

Especially when your own sources contradict you.

 

[g5000]

Nuclear fuel that both France and the USA offered to provide as well as reactors to use it and Iran reclined both.

Iran has accepted Russian nuclear reactors. One is completed. One is underway, and one more is planned.

Iran is a client state of Russia, not France or the USA.

 

[Votto]

This is a perfect, textbook example of an argument from ignorance!

Argument from ignorance - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

You're saying Trump is insane? Welcome to the club!



TRUMP: For the war. For the war! Well, he lied! He got us into the war with lies!

TRUMP: I mean, look at the trouble Bill Clinton got into with something that was totally unimportant. And they tried to impeach him, which was nonsense. And yet Bush got us into this horrible war with lies, by lying. By saying they had WMDs, by saying all sorts of things that happened not to be true.

Indeed. Your persistence in the face of facts is truly amazing.

Especially when your own sources contradict you.

He had WMDs and then he doesn't?

It is purely speculative as to where they all went.

Again, not sure why this is so hard for you.

Then again, you do seem to know it all, so there is that.

 

[Contumacious]

Did you notice how carefully that was phrased? Nothing about Iran enriching uranium to weapons grade levels. just that there is no evidence the Iran is currently building nuclear bombs.

Iran ANNOUNCED that it was enriching up to 60% purity

No evidence that 60% purity is weapons grade

What Is Uranium Enrichment?

Did you know that the same technology used to power a city can also be used to build a nuclear bomb? Uranium enrichment is a process that increases the amount of uranium-235 in natural uranium, making it usable as fuel for nuclear reactors or, at much higher levels, for nuclear weapons. Natural...

www.rferl.org

 

[AZrailwhale]

You can’t be this ignorant on purpose.

Did the US government go to war because it thought Iraq had WMD? Did you hear? No WMD was found.

Stop lying you Zionist traitor!

WMD were found, they were just downplayed by the media just like the French and German violations of the arms embargo against Saddam were downplayed. Most of Saddam's new production weapons systems had modern French or German banned parts in them.

 

[Votto]

Iran has accepted Russian nuclear reactors. One is completed. One is underway, and one more is planned.

Iran is a client state of Russia, not France or the USA.

So, the entire country is about to turn into Chernobyl is what you are saying.

Wow, they are building their own WMD of doom.

 

[AZrailwhale]

So you think W lying us into war is acceptable.

Dumb ****.

Everybody thought Saddam had WMD. He worked very hard convincing even his own generals he had them. In post war interviews all of Saddam's generals said, "my unit didn't have any, but XXX's unit over there had them".

 

[AZrailwhale]

Iran has accepted Russian nuclear reactors. One is completed. One is underway, and one more is planned.

Iran is a client state of Russia, not France or the USA.

Yes, BREEDER reactors, anyone that accepts Russian reactors is an idiot. Chernobyl showed how unsafe they are, no containment domes, no protections against uncontrolled runaways.

 

[g5000]

Iran ANNOUNCED that it was enriching up to 60% purity

No evidence that 60% purity is weapons grade

Actually, 60 percent is close to weapons grade.

Iran has about 275 kilos of 60 percent enriched uranium.

On a good day, you can make a nuke with 17 kilos. But you have to have stayed in a Holiday Inn Express to pull it off.

Here's the thing about a third party building electricity-generating nuclear power plants in Iran.

The uranium in such a plant is Jesus Uranium. It can't be used in a nuclear bomb. It has a peaceful use.

Now, you can take Jesus Uranium and centrifuge the hell out of it to make Jihad Uranium, but you would not have the excuse you are doing that for peaceful purposes. You already have Jesus Uranium, so why are you trying to turn it into Jihad Uranium, Ahmed? There is only one reason you are doing that.

So let Russia and anyone else build those plants. It's a great way to keep Iran from plausibly claiming they are enriching for "peaceful uses".

Israel has killed quite a few of Iran's nuclear scientists, so they may not have the know-how to build a nuke.

 

[AZrailwhale]

Iran has accepted Russian nuclear reactors. One is completed. One is underway, and one more is planned.

Iran is a client state of Russia, not France or the USA.

Iran isn't a client state of Russia, the Mullahs hate Russia almost as much as they hate the USA. They have just been buying Russian weapons since the West refuses to sell them anymore.

 

[g5000]

So, the entire country is about to turn into Chernobyl is what you are saying.

Wow, they are building their own WMD of doom.

A nuclear power plant is not a WMD, and the plants Iran has are not the same as the Chernobyl plant. Apples and oranges.

You are getting dumber and dumber by the minute.

 

[Contumacious]

You start supporting terrorist organizations that want to murder all Jews,

NO EVIDENCE that Iran wants to murder "all the Jews"

Most JEWS on the face of mother earth want to murder the Eurpopean white Supremacists known as ASS-k-NAZI Zionists.

 

[MarcATL]

Bomb the **** out of their military capabilities and don't set a foot in the country

For what reason though, bloodlust?

 

[g5000]

Yes, BREEDER reactors, anyone that accepts Russian reactors is an idiot. Chernobyl showed how unsafe they are, no containment domes, no protections against uncontrolled runaways.

The Russian reactors are not breeder reactors.

And these reactors are completely different from the Chernobyl reactor.

Apples and oranges.

The only breeder reactor Iran had was plugged with concrete under the terms of the JCPOA.

More people have died mining coal than have died from nuclear power.

 

[Nostra]

Only if you are a naive, gullible LaLaLander .

I fail to see how those documents dont prove that the OPPOSITE is true.

You used the IAEA as a source for your OP, then posted that they have no credibility because they are an arm of Israel.