Rafael Grossi : IAEA chief: No evidence Iran is building a nuclear weapon

Can you ask Mr. Grossi why his group concluded

"34. The significantly increased production and accumulation of highly enriched uranium by Iran, the
only non-nuclear-weapon State to produce such nuclear material, is of serious concern."
Firstly , Iran ANNOUNCED that it was increasing enrichment to 60% - so there was no surreptious attemp to conceal an illegitimate goal

Secondly 60% enrichment does not mean a military weapon

thirdly , If Iran was REALLY willing to manufacture an Atomic Bomb they would have accepted their ally NK Kim Jong Un's numerous offers to help.

 
Firstly , Iran ANNOUNCED that it was increasing enrichment to 60% - so there was no surreptious attemp to conceal an illegitimate goal

Secondly 60% enrichment does not mean a military weapon

thirdly , If Iran was REALLY willing to manufacture an Atomic Bomb they would have accepted their ally NK Kim Jong Un's numerous offers to help.
Ok, Once again, why does Mr. Grossi's group think their enrichment to 60% is "a serious concern?"
 
How many nuclear subs does Iran have?

At least 1.

images
 
lol You can't be serious. 🤣
I see.

So we need evidence that Saddam has WMD's but we don't need evidence as to how Saddam disposed of the WMD's he previously used on the Kurds

Understood.

:auiqs.jpg::auiqs.jpg::auiqs.jpg::auiqs.jpg::auiqs.jpg::auiqs.jpg::auiqs.jpg::auiqs.jpg::auiqs.jpg::auiqs.jpg::auiqs.jpg::auiqs.jpg::auiqs.jpg::auiqs.jpg::auiqs.jpg::auiqs.jpg::auiqs.jpg:
 

IAEA chief: No evidence Iran is building a nuclear weapon​



Rafael Grossi - IAEA Chief

"WE DID NOT FIND IN IRAN ELEMENTS TO INDICATE THAT THERE IS AN ACTIVE SYSTEMATIC PLAN TO BUILD A NUCLEAR PROGRAM"

They want their yellowcake and eat it too

The Uranium Hoax that Triggered the Iraq War​


This confirms that the CIA - encouraged by Mitch McConnell and Lindsey Graham - created yet another HOAX to destroy the Trump Presidency and the MAGA Movement .


Where did they look and when? Was it announced?
 
Ok, Once again, why does Mr. Grossi's group think their enrichment to 60% is "a serious concern?"

Enriching uranium from 60% to 90% is considered a relatively short step in the enrichment process, especially if the initial enrichment is already done using centrifuges.
 
Firstly , Iran ANNOUNCED that it was increasing enrichment to 60% - so there was no surreptious attemp to conceal an illegitimate goal

Secondly 60% enrichment does not mean a military weapon

thirdly , If Iran was REALLY willing to manufacture an Atomic Bomb they would have accepted their ally NK Kim Jong Un's numerous offers to help.


In case you didn't see it, this is a link to Mr. Grossi's report this month where he expressed "serious concern" about Iran's uranium enrichment program.

 
We're currently in, and witnessing, this generation's WMDs.

Have we learned from the last time?
 
I don't know that we've ever tried it. In Iraq and Afghanistan we pursued the folly of nation building.
Ya know why it’s never been tried?

It’s a fools errand
 
15th post
I made my point.

It’s a stupidly dangerous idea
It's a balancing of risks, isn't it? Danger of doing nothing is nihilistic religious terrorists obtaining nuclear weapons.

What's the danger in blowing the shit out of their nuclear capabilities?
 
It's a balancing of risks, isn't it? Danger of doing nothing is nihilistic religious terrorists obtaining nuclear weapons.

What's the danger in blowing the shit out of their nuclear capabilities?

Because whatever conservatives are for, it is against, it doesn't have a functioning brain.
 
Back
Top Bottom