Putin-Russia are winning the war.

That is not the point.
The point is that the people forcing the prisoners to murder others, were the Ukrainian guards.
More than any other group, the Ukrainians were collaborators with the death camps.
It must be handy to keep your goal posts on wheels as much as you move them around.
 
A lot of fighting aged males left and thence returned and there's a lot of women strapping it on and fighting too.

The men for the most part get them to the border or at least on a transport vehicle or train and then go back to do their duty.
Utter nonsense. The men couldn't leave country, and nobody stopped anyone from staying. You should really review the timeline.
 
Utter nonsense. The men couldn't leave country, and nobody stopped anyone from staying. You should really review the timeline.
Right, that's why we saw them getting back on trains to return after getting their women and children to safety in Poland.

nobody stopped anyone from staying.
This of course is just more nonsensical babbling and doesn't address anything I've said.
 
Right, that's why we saw them getting back on trains to return after getting their women and children to safety in Poland.


This of course is just more nonsensical babbling and doesn't address anything I've said.
No European country is going to stop refugees from going back. How are you so selectively dense?
 
That is ignorant, because Russia has not been communist since 1992.
When was the last time they had a free and fair election? If that was happening in USA you'd be screaming about communists in the wh.
And the danger to the whole world is the US, invading innocent countries continually, like Vietnam, Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, Panama, Grenada, Syria, etc.
 
Russia is clearly not winning.

They're killing civilians on a massive and Nazi like brutal scale but...
 
When was the last time they had a free and fair election? If that was happening in USA you'd be screaming about communists in the wh.

Not having free and fair elections is not a definition of communism.

Definition of communism is autocratic rule (check) with socialist economy (nope).
 
Replace "Ukrainians" with "Slaws" or "not-Germans" then you are more near to the truth in this context.



Of course neither you nor I were there at these death camps, but those who were testified that it was Ukrainians in particular who manned them the most.
They used the figure of 80% were Ukrainians.
Like Demjanjuk in Sobibor.
 
It must be handy to keep your goal posts on wheels as much as you move them around.

Wrong.
I said that the survivors of these camps said that 80% of those running the camps were Ukraininans.
Then you lied and claimed I was wrong because they were under German supervision.
Now you are still lying by claiming it was Russians and not Ukrainians.
 
Escape From Sobobor

Soros / War Casualties
' Suddenly, these souls are grieving for a nation that was built on Nazism by Soros dating from 1990.'
 
Not having free and fair elections is not a definition of communism.

Definition of communism is autocratic rule (check) with socialist economy (nope).

Yes it is implied in the definition of communism, to have free and fair elections.
Communism is about communal, cooperative, and collective ownership of the means of production.
There is no way to equitable sharing without free and fair elections, a democratic, representative, republic, etc.
Without free and fair elections, you always have an autocratic aristocracy that can NEVER communist in any way.
And autocratic aristocracy is always pure capitalism.
 
When was the last time they had a free and fair election? If that was happening in USA you'd be screaming about communists in the wh.

That is stupid because obviously the US has not had a free or fair election in decades or even a century.
A communist in the White House would be a vast improvement, since communism requires a democratic republic, fairness, freedom, equitable sharing, etc.
 
Yes it is implied in the definition of communism, to have free and fair elections.
Communism is about communal, cooperative, and collective ownership of the means of production.
There is no way to equitable sharing without free and fair elections, a democratic, representative, republic, etc.
Without free and fair elections, you always have an autocratic aristocracy that can NEVER communist in any way.
And autocratic aristocracy is always pure capitalism.
It was communism on the Mayflower.
 
Threads like this sure brings out the Russian sock puppets huh?
 
There are no wonderful angelic kind & perfect people in any government any where. All governments are run by humans, humans are not perfect. and people in exalted power positions are usually very out of touch with the citizens they are suppose to represent.
 

Forum List

Back
Top