spot on .I guess you forgot me mentioning that the posters you call paid agents also post in other forums on this site. Is this unrelated posting also something they are being paid for? Or is it just possible they have these threads on subscribe, and don't mind spending 5 minutes reading and maybe making a quick reply a few times a day?
I come to USMB multiple times a day. I have a couple of threads in the conspiracy forum on subscribe. The main difference between me and these supposed paid agents is I don't usually post quick little one-liners or short insults. It doesn't mean I believe your ridiculous posts, nor does it mean I don't often think the same things.
I haven't noticed these supposed paid agents posting on these 9/11 threads any more than you do. I have also seen you posting on other threads. So, your hypothesis that "Only paid shills have THAT mush time on their hands to devote themselves to come on here and seek attention constantly like they do and troll constantly month after month like they do.". I guess that makes YOU a paid shill as well, huh?
Everyone who disagrees with you is not lying. Everyone who disagrees with you regularly is not paid by the government to do so. It is your own issue that you can't believe anyone can honestly disagree with you. It is your own issue that you can't come up with any of the myriad reasons (retired, unemployed, stay-at-home parent, work from home, post from work, etc.) that someone might be on this message board a lot. It is your own issue that you somehow think your constant posting in this thread, very often much longer posts than the people you complain about, does not indicate a lot of time spent here. And it is your own issue that you believe the government is paying multiple people to shadow you around the conspiracy theory section of a message board, presumably so you don't get 'the truth' out to the masses (who, apparently, are likely to accept the ramblings and youtube videos of some anonymous posters with poor writing skills in the conspiracy section of a message board).
And you think I am crazy?
![]()
![]()
![]()
I'm glad to see another rational thinking person on here. I have posted similar statements about the whole "paid shill" accusations. I don't understand the mindset that the government, or anybody for that matter, is trolling these forums to prevent somebody from "getting the truth out".
And thank you for pointing out the hypocrisy of someone that is on this board all the time, claiming that other people that are here all time, are being paid, simply because they disagree.
I thought that was the whole point of a message board, to share ideas and opinions. Even when those opinions are opposing others opinions.
There are people on here, that once you disagree with them enough, they put you on their "ignore" list. That action alone, tells you that they have no interest in a discussion that may challenge their stance on an issue. They only want to talk to like-minded people and not have to answer any questions.
the twoofers are like a club...strike that....a pity party!
LOL.
All kidding aside, there does seem to be a “club” mentality. When an “inside job” believer defends their position or supplies “evidence” of their claims, they point to another “inside job” believer’s statements or claims. The concept of CLAIM doesn’t equal EVIDENCE escapes most conspiracy theorists. So, no matter how large the “club” gets, they are still just a group of story tellers. And some of the bigger names in the story telling, Griffin, Fetzer, Marrs, etc., see this as nothing more than a business. In all of these books, and there are A LOT, there is no evidence provided. There are a lot of claims and a lot of projections, but no “jaw dropping” evidence.
The fact that “it could have happened” or “it looks like” doesn’t mean that it did. The lack of evidence is the reason that the “Truth Movement” never had any traction. If there was some real, irrefutable evidence, a new investigation could be made to happen. And what is sad, is there are legitimate questions that get drowned out by the “crap pot” claims. Questions about our government intelligence and military’s readiness and ability to react to the attacks are grouped in with “no planes” and “controlled demolition” claims.
I would love to have a rational discussion with someone that has an opposing opinion on 9/11. It’s becoming clear that it’s not going to happen on this message board, but I still hold out hope. I am still able to be convinced that I am wrong. In the couple years following 9/11, I was becoming convinced that something beyond the official story did occur. Films like “Loose Change” had me believing in its version of events. Then in the following years, I looked closer at the actual evidence that was out there. Thus I became a NON-believer in the “inside job” theory. So, I didn’t automatically fall on one side or the other.