[
Your timeline is fucked. Nero is on record persecuting followers of Christ in Rome in 64 AD. To my understanding 64AD is 6 years prior to this imaginary scattering of people once Titus destroyed Jerusalem in 70AD.
maybe you can explain that?
Ok, so you at least believe that Nero existed, and we have exact data about that.
1. the Romans did not record the year 64 AD, because they cared a shit about a made up hippie from Palestine.
2. the year 64 AD is calculatd backwards by the Julian (Caesar) calendar in comparison with Roman data about te same occurances.
3. Yes, I can explain that. In Palestine, a Roman protectorate, lived a few people wealthy enough to travel to Rome. And obviously a few of them did things Nero did't like.
Nobody will ever know what their religious teachings were, BECAUSE THERE ARE NO DAMNED RECORDS!
Stays the fact that the writings of the Jesus story began after Jews and the new Jewish sect were expelled from Palestine and found themelves scatttered around the Mediteranean.
4. Actually I don't give a shit. The only reason why I participate in such discussions is my curiosity to find out how come that educated adult people believe in this bullshit stories.
I understand that the indoctrination as a child has a serious effect on the brain, but I experienced that myself, so that everybody with a minimum of logic capability should be able to recognize this made up scam.