PAYBACK: House GOP launches into investigation of Cassidy Hutchinson

[Lakhota]

Having burned through the people with supposed evidence against the Bidens and several others, the House Oversight Subcommittee will now investigate Cassidy Hutchinson, former assistant to Mark Meadows, even though there is no evidence that she did anything wrong other than to relay truthful testimony that they don’t like.

Their stated reason is near-criminally ironic. They want to get to the bottom of why Hutchinson changed her recall and testimony regarding the days leading up to January 6th.

The trouble for the Subcommittee is that Hutchinson has already answered the question, and her explanation is both simple, easily understood, and damning.

Her testimony changed when she rejected Stefan Passantino, the lawyer provided by Trump and MAGA, and got her own attorney, who advised her to tell the truth and kept her out of traps.

But there is something even more sinister likely swimming below the announcement’s surface.

More at the link below...

PAYBACK: House GOP launches into investigation of Cassidy Hutchinson

The MAGA House GOP is willing to do anything to protect Donald Trump, including trying to destroy the credibility of Cassidy Hutchinson.

washingtonpress.com

Sickening! No low is too low for House Republicans. What do you think?

 

[Orangecat]

Suck it up, buttercup. You reap what you sow.

 

[JackOfNoTrades]

View attachment 887932

Having burned through the people with supposed evidence against the Bidens and several others, the House Oversight Subcommittee will now investigate Cassidy Hutchinson, former assistant to Mark Meadows, even though there is no evidence that she did anything wrong other than to relay truthful testimony that they don’t like.

Their stated reason is near-criminally ironic. They want to get to the bottom of why Hutchinson changed her recall and testimony regarding the days leading up to January 6th.

The trouble for the Subcommittee is that Hutchinson has already answered the question, and her explanation is both simple, easily understood, and damning.

Her testimony changed when she rejected Stefan Passantino, the lawyer provided by Trump and MAGA, and got her own attorney, who advised her to tell the truth and kept her out of traps.

But there is something even more sinister likely swimming below the announcement’s surface.

More at the link below...

PAYBACK: House GOP launches into investigation of Cassidy Hutchinson

The MAGA House GOP is willing to do anything to protect Donald Trump, including trying to destroy the credibility of Cassidy Hutchinson.

washingtonpress.com

Sickening! No low is too low for House Republicans. What do you think?

Well, it's not like they can do anything of value. May as well go back to the well since they ain't getting anything done and no one is going to make hay over shutting the government down in an election year.

 

[lennypartiv]

Maybe next time she will be loyal.

 

[rightwinger]

View attachment 887932

Having burned through the people with supposed evidence against the Bidens and several others, the House Oversight Subcommittee will now investigate Cassidy Hutchinson, former assistant to Mark Meadows, even though there is no evidence that she did anything wrong other than to relay truthful testimony that they don’t like.

Their stated reason is near-criminally ironic. They want to get to the bottom of why Hutchinson changed her recall and testimony regarding the days leading up to January 6th.

The trouble for the Subcommittee is that Hutchinson has already answered the question, and her explanation is both simple, easily understood, and damning.

Her testimony changed when she rejected Stefan Passantino, the lawyer provided by Trump and MAGA, and got her own attorney, who advised her to tell the truth and kept her out of traps.

But there is something even more sinister likely swimming below the announcement’s surface.

More at the link below...

PAYBACK: House GOP launches into investigation of Cassidy Hutchinson

The MAGA House GOP is willing to do anything to protect Donald Trump, including trying to destroy the credibility of Cassidy Hutchinson.

washingtonpress.com

Sickening! No low is too low for House Republicans. What do you think?

All that the Republican House is good for

Bullying anyone who dares to report on Trump

 

[BackAgain]

Maybe next time she will be loyal.

Or even just honest.

 

[rightwinger]

Maybe next time she will be loyal.

You mean lie for Trump

 

[BS Filter]

All that the Republican House is good for

Bullying anyone who dares to report on Trump

You dish it out, expect it right back. What's your problem?

 

[Hutch Starskey]

Maybe next time she will be loyal.

So it’s just dragging her for revenge then?

 

[lennypartiv]

All that the Republican House is good for

Bullying anyone who dares to report on Trump

She had the chance to get her testimony right.

 

[BS Filter]

So it’s just dragging her for revenge then?

Yes. What's your problem?

 

[BS Filter]

You mean lie for Trump

You lie for Biden. What's your problem?

 

[Lakhota]

So it’s just dragging her for revenge then?

Amen! To "paraphrase" from the OP:

Ultimately, though, the GOP often doesn’t need a real reason or real plan. If they can raise issues about Hutchinson, it could distract the public, make her testimony even more controversial, and be a warning to others who might come forward. They know their base is gullible and stupid.

They punish some of the best people.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

Yes. What's your problem?

If you have to ask why that’s a problem then you’re completely fucked in the head.

 

[JackOfNoTrades]

Yes. What's your problem?

She worked for Trump. We're laughing at you for eating your own.

 

[BS Filter]

Amen! To "paraphrase" from the OP:

Ultimately, though, the GOP often doesn’t need a real reason or real plan. If they can raise issues about Hutchinson, it could distract the public, make her testimony even more controversial, and be a warning to others who might come forward.

They punish some of the best people.

Agree. What about if you dish it out then expect it right back don't you understand?

 

[BS Filter]

If you have to ask why that’s a problem then you’re completely fucked in the head.

Dish it out, expect it right back. What's your problem?

 

[Freedomisneverfree]

The Bit*h was writing a book and the Liberals encouraged her to keep writing and talking about the BS in the book.

 

[BS Filter]

She worked for Trump. We're laughing at you for eating your own.

She isn't ours. She's a opportunistic slut.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

Agree. What about if you dish it out then expect it right back don't you understand?

That doesn’t seem petty or childish to you at all?