The claim was world hunger can be alleviated without religion. So why hasn't it been alleviated--even with the help of religious groups? It appears to me that the claim is the non-religious are slackers. They could alleviate world hunger and do not need any help from people of faith. Then why are they choosing not to end world hunger?
Are you saying that religious groups like Christianity and the Vatican don't fix problems with the world, when they can, because other groups should do it instead? Or these poor people should help themselves despite how much filthy wealth the religions have?
Yes I understand the claim. I was adding to it to say that the efforts without religion are superior. The efforts with religion behind them are scams.
Not what I said, but you. That religion is not needed to end world hunger. Fine. Then why hasn't it been ended? At least people of faith are contributing towards that goal. If it can be done without people of faith, do it. We will applaud the success of others.
This doesn't make sense. You are saying religions help feed the hungry, but it doesn't count. It is just a scam. Do people of faith contribute towards feeding the hungry or don't they?
In liquid cash?
No, you're right. They're probably poor and living off donated rice and canned foods by people like me.
That's all that poster ever wants to say. No actual content, just self-absorbed bullshit babbling. I took somebody else off of ignore and unfortunately saw what this asshole had to say. Now everybody goes back to the assholes' time-out corner.
The bible does not say that Jesus bodily ascended. Only that when the disciples looked up from the ground, a cloud had taken him out of their sight.
Now, now. No need to judge her for her opinion.
No I am not.
