... at least until the whole SNAFU can be sorted out legally, objectively and factually. Let's do it.
It's been four weeks now ... when will Republicans actually submit legal evidence into a court of law? ... these cases are being sorted out as we speak, objectively and factually and weighed against written law ... there's nothing the US Military can do to change that ...
Evidence is plentiful of mass systemic voter fraud. However, those patriots working night and day to "prove it" have been since day one suppressed by the cable and print media, radical leftist activists and activist judges. See, YOU do not get to destroy our Republic simply because you want to win an election at all costs. Use of the military in this particular situation, which amounts to a full scale electronic attack by America's enemies, both within and out, is highly pertinent. Only the truth terrifies you people, it seems.
You folks are the ones out to destroy the Republic by overturning a legal election with no sound evidence to the contrary. This has undeservedly eroded their trust in every institution we have. Without that, we cannot function. That is the only thing here that is terrifying.
Don't tell me you've been "gagged;" I've heard all about it.
The witness said that none of ballots were from registered voters and all were for Democratic nominee Joe Biden.
thepostmillennial.com
A Pennsylvania postal truck driver is set to allege that there were an estimated 144,000 to 288,000 completed ballots shipped across three state lines in October, according to new revelations from the Amistad Project. Later Tuesday the national constitutional litigation organization, the Amistad...
thenationalpulse.com
That look legal?
We can't dismiss it cause we don't like it. What are the odds of zero military votes for an R? Why are completed ballots coming in way ahead of time?
What are the odds that those claims are true?
dunno. but we took 3 years to dismiss trumps link to russia. some people still won't drop it.
why the complete and total refusal to look into accusations? if this were reversed, i'm pretty sure you'd demand it.
The investigation into Russian influence was much more complex, and preceded by verified intelligence on Russian attempts to influence elections (and not just ours). It didnât help that members of Team Trump had held meetings with Russians and lied about it.
So you are comparing, as of now, unverified claims, with that. Anyone can say anything. It doesnât mean it is true. It doesnât mean itâs a lie either, or it could be they did not understand what they were seeing. And then there is the automatic assumption that they werenât or wonât be investigated. Do you know that?
And no...if the situation were reversed I would not be making the same demands/assumptions you are. I have a great deal of faith in the integrity of our electoral system, even if I donât always like the results.
history has shown me 2 things.
This is not true. hell RUSSIA alone and you saying they interfered refute this statement from you.
2nd thing is you get mad and ignore me when I point these things out
Can we have like even one discussion without you going off on so about me? Dude, that is a serious big chip youâre carrying.
Why do you say it isnât true? There is a ton intelligence confirming their activities both here and abroad.
You said my statements, were blow off statements. The ones that directly answered your questions.
And lime the wall example, I try to narrow, town to facts we can agree on, you get mad. I'm simply not sure where yo go from here.
And if you can confirm Russia interfered in our elections to the point we had to spend 3 years looking into it, how cwn you claim the integrity of our elections is fine?
Those statements contradict. If you had faith in our system you don't need to look for 3 years to prove connections.
You got your time to look and like I said when this started, we are headed for a "hold my beer" oneupmanship you won't like.
I don't like where any of this is headed. Period.
I'm screaming we are collectively headed for a cliff and most are too enraged calling the other side names to see it.
Maybe boards like this aren't for me anymore. I'd rather talk to someone who listens openly, not tells me I'm full of throw away statements.
In my opinion, you are way over sensitive to what is said. I said, one time only, that I considered one statement, by you, to be a âthrow awayâ statement. Now look at how youâve morphed it. You have no idea the things Iâve been called here
I am not interested in one upmanship. I am past that. Like you, I see our country heading over a cliff, and the edge of that cliff is marked by people who seriously contemplate overturning an election and having comfortably partisan electors overrule the will of the people.
Very dangerous.
The brush off of what I said was a total Slade moment. I put time and effort into an honest you don't read. Not to understand anyway but to simply tell me I'm wrong again.
And I see us headed to the cliff because both sides refuse to see their, own actions and accountability in this. Even now you say it's all the right, left didn't do anything wrong.
What's to "honestly" discuss at this point? In my entire history with you, 5he brush off statement rings true and I've thought you do it. This time you just came out and said it vs accept that I was trying to agree with you.
You never got that point, did you, brushing things off.
And if I ever called you names out of anger or our usual heated discussions, then I do apologize. I'm so tired of people doing that and that includes me.
Sometimes I think we simply understand each other which leads to further misunderstandings. Maybe I am not reading careful,y enough. Mea culpa.
I donât think it is âallâ the rightâs fault. Nothing happens in a vacuum, actions lead to reactions, and new precedents lead to more new precedents. We didnât get to this point due to tbe actions of only one side, so I actually agree with you.
But. Right now, we ARE at this point and IMO that is defined by a series of specific and unprecedented events.
A deliberate undermining of the peopleâs trust in our nationâs electoral system, and as it has unfolded, in the integrity of election officials, pollworkers and our courts that began before Election Day itself. And
a willingness to actually entertain the concept of overturning the election, and go against the voterâs decision, by having Congress appoint the president, knowing it will likely be the election loser.
That is MY cliff edge, and regardless of how we got there, it really isnât both sides right now, pushing us of that edge, it is one.