Not surprisingly, Obama nailed it.

[Billiejeens]

There is no negotiating with Islamic fanatics. They only understand the club over the head. Wack them hard to keep them inline.

Not all that different from US Democrat fanatics.

 

[Billiejeens]

Sorry, it's a Jewish organization. Too much skin in the game to tell the truth.

Berg is a Democrat Cultist - too much skin in the game to tell the truth.

(also overwhelming stupidity)

 

[struth]

So we weren’t allowed to inspect military sites except for when we did inspect military sites and didn’t find any enrichment program.

But they did find two particles of man made uranium.

So that’s why we now have a war?

Atomic watchdog says Iran not complying with nuclear safeguards​

Atomic watchdog says Iran not complying with nuclear safeguards

The UN-backed atomic watchdog passed a resolution on Thursday declaring that Iran is not complying with its obligations regarding nuclear non-proliferation.

news.un.org

UN nuclear watchdog says it's unable to verify whether Iran has suspended all uranium enrichment​

UN nuclear watchdog says it's unable to verify whether Iran has suspended all uranium enrichment

The agency says Iran has four declared enrichment facilities, but it has lost "continuity of knowledge" about stockpiles.

www.pbs.org

UN watchdog declares Iran in breach of nuclear non-proliferation duties​

https://www.iranintl.com/en/202506123029

Featured

The Iran Deal: Repeated Violations of a Fragile Agreement​

The Iran Deal: Repeated Violations of a Fragile Agreement | HonestReporting{assetid}&gad_source=1&gad_campaignid=23470680903&gbraid=0AAAAACP9FojGONiKtkREovSPJTkf7tPUz&gclid=EAIaIQobChMIycmAsOe4kwMVY21HAR3boCAQEAAYASAAEgKBqPD_BwE

Iran never cared about any deal, with Obama, or the UN...or the world.

Keep lying to yourself and spreading Iranian propaganda

 

[Billiejeens]

Atomic watchdog says Iran not complying with nuclear safeguards​

Atomic watchdog says Iran not complying with nuclear safeguards

The UN-backed atomic watchdog passed a resolution on Thursday declaring that Iran is not complying with its obligations regarding nuclear non-proliferation.

news.un.org

UN nuclear watchdog says it's unable to verify whether Iran has suspended all uranium enrichment​

UN nuclear watchdog says it's unable to verify whether Iran has suspended all uranium enrichment

The agency says Iran has four declared enrichment facilities, but it has lost "continuity of knowledge" about stockpiles.

www.pbs.org

UN watchdog declares Iran in breach of nuclear non-proliferation duties​

https://www.iranintl.com/en/202506123029

Featured

The Iran Deal: Repeated Violations of a Fragile Agreement​

The Iran Deal: Repeated Violations of a Fragile Agreement | HonestReporting{assetid}&gad_source=1&gad_campaignid=23470680903&gbraid=0AAAAACP9FojGONiKtkREovSPJTkf7tPUz&gclid=EAIaIQobChMIycmAsOe4kwMVY21HAR3boCAQEAAYASAAEgKBqPD_BwE

Iran never cared about any deal, with Obama, or the UN...or the world.

Keep lying to yourself and spreading Iranian propaganda

I don't know how any of this is even in dispute, even with someone has phucked in the head as Marener.

 

[LeftofLeft]

Notice how Obama built an international coalition including EU, Russia and China to craft a nuclear deal?
Trump just attacks and says…..what are you going to do about it?

That was a great deal….. for Iran. Iran knew it was dealing with an appeaser in Obama and enablers with China and Russia where it could keep developing its nuclear program and funding its proxy agents to attack the US and Israel.

 

[Marener]

no one—including IAEA inspectors—was granted unrestricted or immediate access to all of Iran's nuclear sites, particularly suspected or undeclared ones and military facilities under the JCPOA (Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action, the 2015 Iran nuclear deal),

Technical Difficulties

IAEA inspectors could verify that Iran was not enriching beyond 3.6% because they could inspect Fordow and Natanz.

 

[Marener]

Atomic watchdog says Iran not complying with nuclear safeguards​

Atomic watchdog says Iran not complying with nuclear safeguards

The UN-backed atomic watchdog passed a resolution on Thursday declaring that Iran is not complying with its obligations regarding nuclear non-proliferation.

news.un.org

UN nuclear watchdog says it's unable to verify whether Iran has suspended all uranium enrichment​

UN nuclear watchdog says it's unable to verify whether Iran has suspended all uranium enrichment

The agency says Iran has four declared enrichment facilities, but it has lost "continuity of knowledge" about stockpiles.

www.pbs.org

UN watchdog declares Iran in breach of nuclear non-proliferation duties​

https://www.iranintl.com/en/202506123029

Featured

The Iran Deal: Repeated Violations of a Fragile Agreement​

The Iran Deal: Repeated Violations of a Fragile Agreement | HonestReporting{assetid}&gad_source=1&gad_campaignid=23470680903&gbraid=0AAAAACP9FojGONiKtkREovSPJTkf7tPUz&gclid=EAIaIQobChMIycmAsOe4kwMVY21HAR3boCAQEAAYASAAEgKBqPD_BwE

Iran never cared about any deal, with Obama, or the UN...or the world.

Keep lying to yourself and spreading Iranian propaganda

Your links show that Iran got highly enriched uranium after Trump ended the deal.

Which is why he shouldn’t have ended the deal.

 

[Nostra]

IAEA inspectors could verify that Iran was not enriching beyond 3.6% because they could inspect Fordow and Natanz.

Inspectors with the International Atomic Energy Agency, the United Nations organization tasked with monitoring Iran’s nuclear facilities, have not requested access to military sites since the agreement went into effect, according to experts monitoring the process.

Iran says military sites are off-limits for nuclear inspections despite U.S. pressure

As the Trump administration calls for stricter monitoring of the Iranian nuclear agreement, officials in Iran insist they are complying with its terms and will not allow international inspectors into military sites.

www.latimes.com

 

[Nostra]

IAEA inspectors could verify that Iran was not enriching beyond 3.6% because they could inspect Fordow and Natanz.

“Americans will not be allowed to inspect the military bases,” said Mohammad Bagher Nobakht, a member of Iran’s nuclear implementation committee, according to state television.

Mohammad Nabi Habibi, secretary-general of the Islamic Coalition Party, which is close to Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, said Iran had agreed to detailed inspections and not denied inspectors access to any facility.

“Why do the Americans want more?” Habibi said in an interview with the semi-official ILNA news agency. “I think the Americans are preparing to break up [the nuclear deal].”

For many Iranians — including those who support the nuclear deal — keeping inspectors out of military facilities is a point of national pride.

“It’s our country, and any country’s defense systems should be off-limits to international inspections,” said Susan Saderi, a 44-year-old newspaper employee in Tehran. “I’d be unhappy if the government allowed inspections, even secretly.”

Jaafari Mohammadi, a middle-aged motorcycle deliveryman, said access to the Parchin military complex outside Tehran was “a red line” for Iranians.

“We cannot compromise on our military sites,” Mohammadi said. “It’s our honor, or our wife — we cannot give access to others.”

Iran says military sites are off-limits for nuclear inspections despite U.S. pressure

As the Trump administration calls for stricter monitoring of the Iranian nuclear agreement, officials in Iran insist they are complying with its terms and will not allow international inspectors into military sites.

www.latimes.com

 

[Nostra]

IAEA inspectors could verify that Iran was not enriching beyond 3.6% because they could inspect Fordow and Natanz.

“The lack of ongoing access to Parchin calls into question the adequacy of the verification of the [nuclear deal] and the deal’s long-term utility to deter Iran from obtaining nuclear weapons,” the report said.

 

[struth]

Your links show that Iran got highly enriched uranium after Trump ended the deal.

Which is why he shouldn’t have ended the deal.

he didn't end the deal, he ended Obama's agreement with Iran, but Iran had deals with the UN....they signed the non-prolifernation treaty....with the UN, they violated that. The US, Trump, or obama have nothing to do with that.

Try again. Keep defending Iran.

 

[berg80]

That was a great deal….. for Iran. Iran knew it was dealing with an appeaser in Obama and enablers with China and Russia where it could keep developing its nuclear program and funding its proxy agents to attack the US and Israel.

Iran was nowhere close to a nuclear bomb, experts say

Confusion on whether Iran truly needed only “two weeks to four weeks” to make a nuclear weapon, as President Donald Trump suggested on Monday, hangs over the ongoing U.S. and Israeli war on the Persian Gulf nation. Nuclear experts call this claim unlikely—but the confusion may stem from some basics of atomic chemistry.

“There was no evidence that Iran was close to a nuclear weapon,” says Jeffrey Lewis of the James Martin Center for Nonproliferation Studies at the Middlebury Institute of International Studies. His comment echoed those of other experts after the war’s start, as well as statements from International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) chief Rafael Grossi at that time and in 2025 and last year’s “threat assessment” report by U.S. intelligence agencies.

According to an IAEA estimate, as of June 2025, Iran possessed 441 kilograms of 60 percent enriched uranium, where the percentage refers to the share of the isotope uranium 235 (U 235) found in the material. That would be enough for 10 nuclear weapons if the material could be enriched further to full 90 percent weapons-grade concentrations, according to the IAEA. That further enrichment would take a matter of weeks in a fully functioning Iranian nuclear complex, perhaps explaining the time line within Trump’s declaration.

That step alone doesn’t equal a bomb, however. And Iran’s main enrichment capabilities were “completely and totally obliterated,” according to Trump himself in June, after the U.S. bombed three underground Iranian facilities. The administration’s special envoy to the Middle East Steve Witkoff nonetheless claimed on March 3, after the start of the current war, that Iran had the capability to make 11 nuclear bombs. Trump administration officials reportedly failed to include nuclear technical experts in their negotiation teams with Iran prior to the war, adding to the uncertainty. If Iran really had rebuilt these facilities, that might have led—over months and not weeks—to the nation resuming its uranium enrichment, Lewis says. “But this is all ‘if,’ ‘maybe’ and ‘later,’” he adds.

Iran was nowhere close to a nuclear bomb, experts say​

Although President Trump has claimed Iran was weeks away from developing a nuclear weapon, much more work was needed for the country to do so

www.scientificamerican.com

 

[Nostra]

Your links show that Iran got highly enriched uranium after Trump ended the deal.

Which is why he shouldn’t have ended the deal.

It didn't end for all the other countries, Simp. So you just admitted they violated the deal.

 

[Marener]

he didn't end the deal, he ended Obama's agreement with Iran, but Iran had deals with the UN....they signed the non-prolifernation treaty....with the UN, they violated that. The US, Trump, or obama have nothing to do with that.

Try again. Keep defending Iran.

So you’re criticizing Iran for violating the deal we violated first?

 

[Nostra]

IAEA inspectors could verify that Iran was not enriching beyond 3.6% because they could inspect Fordow and Natanz.

Link us up to the number of times they inspected Parchin, Moroner.

 

[Marener]

Link us up to the number of times they inspected Parchin, Moroner.

2015

 

[pknopp]

Obama used the 2001 AUMF as justification for most of his actions. Not Libya, but his action against ISIS and a whole host of other groups in far away places. We continued using that AUMF as justification for these actions under Trump and Biden
as well.

It was all still a choice.

 

[LeftofLeft]

Iran was nowhere close to a nuclear bomb, experts say

Confusion on whether Iran truly needed only “two weeks to four weeks” to make a nuclear weapon, as President Donald Trump suggested on Monday, hangs over the ongoing U.S. and Israeli war on the Persian Gulf nation. Nuclear experts call this claim unlikely—but the confusion may stem from some basics of atomic chemistry.

“There was no evidence that Iran was close to a nuclear weapon,” says Jeffrey Lewis of the James Martin Center for Nonproliferation Studies at the Middlebury Institute of International Studies. His comment echoed those of other experts after the war’s start, as well as statements from International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) chief Rafael Grossi at that time and in 2025 and last year’s “threat assessment” report by U.S. intelligence agencies.

According to an IAEA estimate, as of June 2025, Iran possessed 441 kilograms of 60 percent enriched uranium, where the percentage refers to the share of the isotope uranium 235 (U 235) found in the material. That would be enough for 10 nuclear weapons if the material could be enriched further to full 90 percent weapons-grade concentrations, according to the IAEA. That further enrichment would take a matter of weeks in a fully functioning Iranian nuclear complex, perhaps explaining the time line within Trump’s declaration.

That step alone doesn’t equal a bomb, however. And Iran’s main enrichment capabilities were “completely and totally obliterated,” according to Trump himself in June, after the U.S. bombed three underground Iranian facilities. The administration’s special envoy to the Middle East Steve Witkoff nonetheless claimed on March 3, after the start of the current war, that Iran had the capability to make 11 nuclear bombs. Trump administration officials reportedly failed to include nuclear technical experts in their negotiation teams with Iran prior to the war, adding to the uncertainty. If Iran really had rebuilt these facilities, that might have led—over months and not weeks—to the nation resuming its uranium enrichment, Lewis says. “But this is all ‘if,’ ‘maybe’ and ‘later,’” he adds.

Iran was nowhere close to a nuclear bomb, experts say​

Although President Trump has claimed Iran was weeks away from developing a nuclear weapon, much more work was needed for the country to do so

www.scientificamerican.com

Why were they developing one in the first place AND funding proxies to attack US?

 

[struth]

So you’re criticizing Iran for violating the deal we violated first?

We never signed any non-proliferation treaty, try again dembot

 

[popscottpopscott]

IAEA inspectors could verify that Iran was not enriching beyond 3.6% because they could inspect Fordow and Natanz.

So. This only covered what Iran declared sites. It did not guarantee detection of covert enrichment activities at undeclared sites, hidden centrifuge cascades, or parallel programs. The agreement did not provide immediate or unrestricted access to military or suspicious non-declared sites., The JCPOA did not give the IAEA full visibility into Iran's total centrifuge inventory or manufacturing.

Technical Difficulties

click here not a tech difficulty.