- Thread starter
- Banned
- #101
I didn't reject her stories, I said they couldn't be considered a "fact" without corroborating evidence.I see.
So you reject Irose's innocuous first-hand stories because she can't prove their veracity yet you not only embrace the unsubstantiated stories from unidentified "Palestinians" as reported by Global Research, you deem Israel to be worthy of destruction.
I can tell you all Nazis share your methodology and POV, Princess.
Eye-witness testimony is credible in any court of law. And if you bothered to go to the link and read what you're objecting to, you would see these people are not "unidentified", their names are clearly stated.