My wife was in Walmart today during a shootout

[Failzero]

I assure you I am no threat to anyone, simply because of the fact that I am carrying...I am only a threat to those who would threaten myself, my family, or innocent people...In fact, without knowing me, you would never know I even had it....

Printing and Brandishing are a No No in Ca . For CCW holders with all the Liberal Nutters with cell phones around . And if you pull your EDC then it better go bang .

 

[TimFitz]

I assure you I am no threat to anyone, simply because of the fact that I am carrying...I am only a threat to those who would threaten myself, my family, or innocent people...In fact, without knowing me, you would never know I even had it....

That may be true in your own mind.

But if I encountered someone like you out in public, I would walk away as fast as I can.

I don’t know you. I have no reason to trust you any basis for assuming that the guy carrying is anything but a potential threat.

Guns are weapons, period.

The guy walking around carrying and assuring me online that he is no threat is just a stranger with a gun.

 

[Failzero]

That may be true in your own mind.

But if I encountered someone like you out in public, I would walk away as fast as I can.

I don’t know you. I have no reason to trust you any basis for assuming that the guy carrying is anything but a potential threat.

Guns are weapons, period.

The guy walking around carrying and assuring me online that he is no threat is just a stranger with a gun.

So every LEO is a “ Stranger with a Gun “ but to consider a Criminal with a Gun a “ Stranger with a Gun “ is Racis

 

[westwall]

That may be true in your own mind.

But if I encountered someone like you out in public, I would walk away as fast as I can.

I don’t know you. I have no reason to trust you any basis for assuming that the guy carrying is anything but a potential threat.

Guns are weapons, period.

The guy walking around carrying and assuring me online that he is no threat is just a stranger with a gun.

No you wouldn't because you would never even know.

 

[j-mac]

That may be true in your own mind.

But if I encountered someone like you out in public, I would walk away as fast as I can.

I don’t know you. I have no reason to trust you any basis for assuming that the guy carrying is anything but a potential threat.

Guns are weapons, period.

The guy walking around carrying and assuring me online that he is no threat is just a stranger with a gun.

A gun is a tool. Nothing more….Are you frightened of mechanics, or repair crews as well? They have tools.

Like I said you wouldn’t even know I had it.

 

[Failzero]

almost 14 years of Daily CCW in Ca. And not ONE situation where I have been even close to drawing my EDC . And very few situations where “ Strangers “ or others saw or thought I was Armed .

 

[M14 Shooter]

Gun nuttery.
Fools who actually believe that we are better off with gun toting self appointed vigilantes shooting each other up in public spaces.
Self righteous, selfish pussies.

Tell us why you would choose to allow yourself, your wife, and/or your kids to be shot, rather than you run the risk of shooting a bystander while protecting them.

 

[M14 Shooter]

No, I definately would not.
A stranger toting a gun is a material threat. no one knows who they are, or what they might do.
They are inherently not trustworthy, since they make up their own law and assert their “right” to project their law on strangers around them.
But I didn’t have to say all that.
your own self righteous assertion that a gun nut is ther to protect anybody made my point all by itself.

Tell us why you would choose to allow yourself, your wife, and/or your kids to be shot, rather than you run the risk of shooting a bystander while protecting them.

 

[M14 Shooter]

That may be true in your own mind.
But if I encountered someone like you out in public, I would walk away as fast as I can.
I don’t know you. I have no reason to trust you any basis for assuming that the guy carrying is anything but a potential threat.
Guns are weapons, period.
The guy walking around carrying and assuring me online that he is no threat is just a stranger with a gun.

Tell us why you would choose to allow yourself, your wife, and/or your kids to be shot, rather than you run the risk of shooting a bystander while protecting them.

 

[TimFitz]

Tell us why you would choose to allow yourself, your wife, and/or your kids to be shot, rather than you run the risk of shooting a bystander while protecting them.

It’s a false construct.

Guns are not required or desirable.

 

[Failzero]

It’s a false construct.

Guns are not required or desirable.

lol

 

[westwall]

It’s a false construct.

Guns are not required or desirable.

When bad guys have them you sure as hell do. And the dems have imported over 400,000 violent criminals, not to mention the home grown variety.

 

[M14 Shooter]

It’s a false construct.

It's YOUR argument against using a firearm in self-defense in the scenario presented.
The only way my question is a false construct is if your argument is a false construct.
So...
Tell us why you would choose to allow yourself, your wife, and/or your kids to be shot, rather than you run the risk of shooting a bystander while protecting them.

 

[M14 Shooter]

Guns are not required or desirable.

Your opinion doesn't matter.

 

[Captain Caveman]

Moral of the story:

Unsuitable gun nutters.

 

[Picaro]

Unsuitable gun nutters.

White America is safer than most of white Europe. Your gun nutters are mostly black and latino. Live with it.

 

[Captain Caveman]

White America is safer than most of white Europe. Your gun nutters are mostly black and latino. Live with it.

Clearly you've banged your head.

Which kind of idiot would take a loaded gun into a public place, especially when shopping and shopping with your family, and start shooting one another?

Retards shooting retards and you're confused why America has a gun stat problem? Retards all round!!

A scaffolding plank is brighter than you lot.

 

[Captain Caveman]

Picaro if you're a nation of Freedoms (that marketing slogan), then why don't you wish to Freedom From Violence and Gun Violence In Public?

Don't tell me, "Mouth froth mouth froth 2nd Amendment".

New US Marketing Slogan - The 2ndA, Proudly arming nutters to shoot nutters since 1776

 

[Picaro]

Clearly you've banged your head.

Which kind of idiot would take a loaded gun into a public place, especially when shopping and shopping with your family, and start shooting one another?

Retards shooting retards and you're confused why America has a gun stat problem? Retards all round!!

the kind who wants to defend themselves from armed criminals, moron. I'm not confused at all about what the 'gun problem' really is. The 'problem' is easily solved, but then we will hear 'racists!!! racists!!!' sniveling no end, and with no border controls it is ultimately futile to keep guns out of the hands of criminals. America isn't London; the average response time for our County sheriff to an emergency call is over 20 minutes. You're the 'retard', having zero clue what the U.S. is like.

'Gun control' here is merely about disarming honest white people so they won't shoot black and brown thugs, is all. That's it, period.

 

[Picaro]

Picaro if you're a nation of Freedoms (that marketing slogan), then why don't you wish to Freedom From Violence and Gun Violence In Public?

Don't tell me, "Mouth froth mouth froth 2nd Amendment".

New US Marketing Slogan - The 2ndA, Proudly arming nutters to shoot nutters since 1776

Another stupid 'point'. Stop the booze before you lose the rest of your brain cells. The percentage of legally owned guns used in crimes is statistically nil.

Crime and Guns: Insights into the sources of crime guns, their use, regional/international variations, and more.

Research concerning guns, gun control, and crime. Includes data on violent and property crime, crime deterrence, and non gun-control aspects of crime legislation.

www.gunfacts.info