Muslim truck drivers refuse to deliver beer, get $240,000 in damages

[ogibillm]

I'm saying that if you sign up for a job, leave your religion at the door when you show up to work.

They could do the job. Just not thise particular deliveries. The company admits they didn't even try to accommodate them.

If the other routes are being handled by other drivers then what should be done.
Fire drivers to accommodate these guys?

It probably would have cost the company thousands of dollars to bring a different truck to wherever this pickup was at to haul it to it's destination. Dispatchers usually call the truck closest to the pickup which happened to be these clowns. The next closest truck may have been hundreds of miles if not over a thousand away.

if that's the case then that accommodation is unreasonable and the company would not have admitted fault.

 

[ogibillm]

What does obama have to do with this? These accommodation laws predate his administration

What?

Hussein is the Muslim in Chief!

Haven't you heard??

Try again. what does the president have to.do with this story? The laws predate his administration. Is there some reason Muslims are not entitled to protection under the law?

Obama has enabled a culture where Muslims feel favored.

One of their many tactics to achieve preferential treatment is to resort to taking legal action whenever some matter doesn't suit them.

This case was won due to religious discrimination - how can it be called discrimination if the drivers are merely asked to perform their duties!

Obviously if there is some conflict they should have sought employment elsewhere!

How utterly ludicrous!

So it's your belief that muslims should not be afforded equal protection?

They should be afforded protection where it makes sense.

This incident doesn't.

this doesn't make sense? it doesn't make sense for them to drive other trucks from a shipping company that sends out many trucks?
just admit you hate muslims and be done with it.

 

[Rustic]

Na, let them crazy Muslims kill each other off, they are so tribal over there from one week to the next they will hate their own mother.

So, you're OK with

]The Muslims can kill anyone they disagree with, and have as many baby brothels as they want, and throw are many homosexuals off roofs as they want, and chop the heads off as many christains as they want.

then?

If you're OK with all that, I wonder why you're criticising

The progressives just look the other way, out of fear I suspect

?

My point is progressives are control freaks toward everyone but Muslims, being the most violent cult the world has ever seen.
...you a little slow tonight??

No, your point is to dump on progressives without any thought at all.

Nice deflection...

Not at all...I've summed up your whole contribution to this discussion.

Hipocrisy deserves to be dumped on...

 

[Rustic]

What?

Hussein is the Muslim in Chief!

Haven't you heard??

Try again. what does the president have to.do with this story? The laws predate his administration. Is there some reason Muslims are not entitled to protection under the law?

Obama has enabled a culture where Muslims feel favored.

One of their many tactics to achieve preferential treatment is to resort to taking legal action whenever some matter doesn't suit them.

This case was won due to religious discrimination - how can it be called discrimination if the drivers are merely asked to perform their duties!

Obviously if there is some conflict they should have sought employment elsewhere!

How utterly ludicrous!

So it's your belief that muslims should not be afforded equal protection?

They should be afforded protection where it makes sense.

This incident doesn't.

this doesn't make sense? it doesn't make sense for them to drive other trucks from a shipping company that sends out many trucks?
just admit you hate muslims and be done with it.

Yes, I do. I hate violent cults... That I do.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

I'm saying that if you sign up for a job, leave your religion at the door when you show up to work.

They could do the job. Just not thise particular deliveries. The company admits they didn't even try to accommodate them.

If the other routes are being handled by other drivers then what should be done.
Fire drivers to accommodate these guys?

It probably would have cost the company thousands of dollars to bring a different truck to wherever this pickup was at to haul it to it's destination. Dispatchers usually call the truck closest to the pickup which happened to be these clowns. The next closest truck may have been hundreds of miles if not over a thousand away.

if that's the case then that accommodation is unreasonable and the company would not have admitted fault.

Just because a company settles doesn't mean they admit fault. It means it's cheaper to just payoff these jokers and be done with it. Companies have insurance for these type of things.

 

[idb]

So, you're OK with
then?

If you're OK with all that, I wonder why you're criticising
?

My point is progressives are control freaks toward everyone but Muslims, being the most violent cult the world has ever seen.
...you a little slow tonight??

No, your point is to dump on progressives without any thought at all.

Nice deflection...

Not at all...I've summed up your whole contribution to this discussion.

Hipocrisy deserves to be dumped on...

So...you think that troops should be sent into Syria to protect the gays being thrown off roofs, and Christians getting their heads cut off etc, etc?
If you don't then the hypocrisy is yours because you criticise progressives for standing by and letting it happen.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

I'm saying that if you sign up for a job, leave your religion at the door when you show up to work.

They could do the job. Just not thise particular deliveries. The company admits they didn't even try to accommodate them.

If the other routes are being handled by other drivers then what should be done.
Fire drivers to accommodate these guys?

It probably would have cost the company thousands of dollars to bring a different truck to wherever this pickup was at to haul it to it's destination. Dispatchers usually call the truck closest to the pickup which happened to be these clowns. The next closest truck may have been hundreds of miles if not over a thousand away.

if that's the case then that accommodation is unreasonable and the company would not have admitted fault.

Just because a company settles doesn't mean they admit fault. It means it's cheaper to just payoff these jokers and be done with it. Companies have insurance for these type of things.

Seems that they did admit fault, part of the agreement. Next time, obey the law. It's cheaper...

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

They could do the job. Just not thise particular deliveries. The company admits they didn't even try to accommodate them.

If the other routes are being handled by other drivers then what should be done.
Fire drivers to accommodate these guys?

It probably would have cost the company thousands of dollars to bring a different truck to wherever this pickup was at to haul it to it's destination. Dispatchers usually call the truck closest to the pickup which happened to be these clowns. The next closest truck may have been hundreds of miles if not over a thousand away.

if that's the case then that accommodation is unreasonable and the company would not have admitted fault.

Just because a company settles doesn't mean they admit fault. It means it's cheaper to just payoff these jokers and be done with it. Companies have insurance for these type of things.

Seems that they did admit fault, part of the agreement. Next time, obey the law. It's cheaper...

Of course. Hiring somebody to do a job and expect them to do it is the employers fault. How silly of me to think otherwise.

 

[ogibillm]

I'm saying that if you sign up for a job, leave your religion at the door when you show up to work.

They could do the job. Just not thise particular deliveries. The company admits they didn't even try to accommodate them.

If the other routes are being handled by other drivers then what should be done.
Fire drivers to accommodate these guys?

It probably would have cost the company thousands of dollars to bring a different truck to wherever this pickup was at to haul it to it's destination. Dispatchers usually call the truck closest to the pickup which happened to be these clowns. The next closest truck may have been hundreds of miles if not over a thousand away.

if that's the case then that accommodation is unreasonable and the company would not have admitted fault.

Just because a company settles doesn't mean they admit fault. It means it's cheaper to just payoff these jokers and be done with it. Companies have insurance for these type of things.

The EEOC argued that the company could have easily reassigned the drivers but did not and sued it for religious discrimination. Star Transport admitted liability in March. The jury awarded Mohamed and Bulshale $20,000 each in compensatory damages and $100,000 each in punitive damages. The judge awarded each about $1,500 in back pay.

"This case makes me proud to be American," Bulshale said.

EEOC wins discrimination case for Muslims fired for not delivering beer
so they admitted to it... what's the problem?

 

[ogibillm]

If the other routes are being handled by other drivers then what should be done.
Fire drivers to accommodate these guys?

It probably would have cost the company thousands of dollars to bring a different truck to wherever this pickup was at to haul it to it's destination. Dispatchers usually call the truck closest to the pickup which happened to be these clowns. The next closest truck may have been hundreds of miles if not over a thousand away.

if that's the case then that accommodation is unreasonable and the company would not have admitted fault.

Just because a company settles doesn't mean they admit fault. It means it's cheaper to just payoff these jokers and be done with it. Companies have insurance for these type of things.

Seems that they did admit fault, part of the agreement. Next time, obey the law. It's cheaper...

Of course. Hiring somebody to do a job and expect them to do it is the employers fault. How silly of me to think otherwise.

again, they're just asking for a reasonable accommodation. if the company sends out say 10 trucks a day and only 2 of them carry alcohol it's not unreasonable to assign the men to one of the other trucks. the company refused to do that.

 

[Rexx Taylor]

i wonder what the outcome would of been if it was a shipment of penthouse magazines.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

They could do the job. Just not thise particular deliveries. The company admits they didn't even try to accommodate them.

If the other routes are being handled by other drivers then what should be done.
Fire drivers to accommodate these guys?

It probably would have cost the company thousands of dollars to bring a different truck to wherever this pickup was at to haul it to it's destination. Dispatchers usually call the truck closest to the pickup which happened to be these clowns. The next closest truck may have been hundreds of miles if not over a thousand away.

if that's the case then that accommodation is unreasonable and the company would not have admitted fault.

Just because a company settles doesn't mean they admit fault. It means it's cheaper to just payoff these jokers and be done with it. Companies have insurance for these type of things.

The EEOC argued that the company could have easily reassigned the drivers but did not and sued it for religious discrimination. Star Transport admitted liability in March. The jury awarded Mohamed and Bulshale $20,000 each in compensatory damages and $100,000 each in punitive damages. The judge awarded each about $1,500 in back pay.

"This case makes me proud to be American," Bulshale said.

EEOC wins discrimination case for Muslims fired for not delivering beer
so they admitted to it... what's the problem?

The problem is liberalism and liberal courts. They both need to be abolished in this country.

If you don't like our society, then GTF out of our country. We didn't ask you to come here in the first place. The other problem is we have these foreigners that insist we change for them instead of the other way around. If your country and their standards was so great, then go back there. You won't have to deliver beer, and if your daughters get raped, they will be put to death for shaming their family. We don't do that here.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

It probably would have cost the company thousands of dollars to bring a different truck to wherever this pickup was at to haul it to it's destination. Dispatchers usually call the truck closest to the pickup which happened to be these clowns. The next closest truck may have been hundreds of miles if not over a thousand away.

if that's the case then that accommodation is unreasonable and the company would not have admitted fault.

Just because a company settles doesn't mean they admit fault. It means it's cheaper to just payoff these jokers and be done with it. Companies have insurance for these type of things.

Seems that they did admit fault, part of the agreement. Next time, obey the law. It's cheaper...

Of course. Hiring somebody to do a job and expect them to do it is the employers fault. How silly of me to think otherwise.

again, they're just asking for a reasonable accommodation. if the company sends out say 10 trucks a day and only 2 of them carry alcohol it's not unreasonable to assign the men to one of the other trucks. the company refused to do that.

As a truck driver, your job is to deliver freight. Unless your cargo is illegal, you have no say-so as to what you are to deliver. If you don't want to deliver alcohol, then don't drive a truck.

 

[ogibillm]

If the other routes are being handled by other drivers then what should be done.
Fire drivers to accommodate these guys?

It probably would have cost the company thousands of dollars to bring a different truck to wherever this pickup was at to haul it to it's destination. Dispatchers usually call the truck closest to the pickup which happened to be these clowns. The next closest truck may have been hundreds of miles if not over a thousand away.

if that's the case then that accommodation is unreasonable and the company would not have admitted fault.

Just because a company settles doesn't mean they admit fault. It means it's cheaper to just payoff these jokers and be done with it. Companies have insurance for these type of things.

The EEOC argued that the company could have easily reassigned the drivers but did not and sued it for religious discrimination. Star Transport admitted liability in March. The jury awarded Mohamed and Bulshale $20,000 each in compensatory damages and $100,000 each in punitive damages. The judge awarded each about $1,500 in back pay.

"This case makes me proud to be American," Bulshale said.

EEOC wins discrimination case for Muslims fired for not delivering beer
so they admitted to it... what's the problem?

The problem is liberalism and liberal courts. They both need to be abolished in this country.

If you don't like our society, then GTF out of our country. We didn't ask you to come here in the first place. The other problem is we have these foreigners that insist we change for them instead of the other way around. If your country and their standards was so great, then go back there. You won't have to deliver beer, and if your daughters get raped, they will be put to death for shaming their family. We don't do that here.

how would the business have been hurt if they had accommodated their employees religious objections?

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

It probably would have cost the company thousands of dollars to bring a different truck to wherever this pickup was at to haul it to it's destination. Dispatchers usually call the truck closest to the pickup which happened to be these clowns. The next closest truck may have been hundreds of miles if not over a thousand away.

if that's the case then that accommodation is unreasonable and the company would not have admitted fault.

Just because a company settles doesn't mean they admit fault. It means it's cheaper to just payoff these jokers and be done with it. Companies have insurance for these type of things.

The EEOC argued that the company could have easily reassigned the drivers but did not and sued it for religious discrimination. Star Transport admitted liability in March. The jury awarded Mohamed and Bulshale $20,000 each in compensatory damages and $100,000 each in punitive damages. The judge awarded each about $1,500 in back pay.

"This case makes me proud to be American," Bulshale said.

EEOC wins discrimination case for Muslims fired for not delivering beer
so they admitted to it... what's the problem?

The problem is liberalism and liberal courts. They both need to be abolished in this country.

If you don't like our society, then GTF out of our country. We didn't ask you to come here in the first place. The other problem is we have these foreigners that insist we change for them instead of the other way around. If your country and their standards was so great, then go back there. You won't have to deliver beer, and if your daughters get raped, they will be put to death for shaming their family. We don't do that here.

how would the business have been hurt if they had accommodated their employees religious objections?

Because the cost to replace a truck is expensive. Who knows how far they would have had to summon another truck because of these anti-Americans. Dispatchers make schedules. Everything is planned well ahead of time to maximize profit for the company.

If you don't like the fact that we use, deliver, consume alcohol, then GTF out of our country. That's what we do here, and if you're going to take a job, then do the job.

 

[ogibillm]

if that's the case then that accommodation is unreasonable and the company would not have admitted fault.

Just because a company settles doesn't mean they admit fault. It means it's cheaper to just payoff these jokers and be done with it. Companies have insurance for these type of things.

The EEOC argued that the company could have easily reassigned the drivers but did not and sued it for religious discrimination. Star Transport admitted liability in March. The jury awarded Mohamed and Bulshale $20,000 each in compensatory damages and $100,000 each in punitive damages. The judge awarded each about $1,500 in back pay.

"This case makes me proud to be American," Bulshale said.

EEOC wins discrimination case for Muslims fired for not delivering beer
so they admitted to it... what's the problem?

The problem is liberalism and liberal courts. They both need to be abolished in this country.

If you don't like our society, then GTF out of our country. We didn't ask you to come here in the first place. The other problem is we have these foreigners that insist we change for them instead of the other way around. If your country and their standards was so great, then go back there. You won't have to deliver beer, and if your daughters get raped, they will be put to death for shaming their family. We don't do that here.

how would the business have been hurt if they had accommodated their employees religious objections?

Because the cost to replace a truck is expensive. Who knows how far they would have had to summon another truck because of these anti-Americans. Dispatchers make schedules. Everything is planned well ahead of time to maximize profit for the company.

so once again, if that were the case the accommodation would be unreasonable. the company says they didn't even try. they lost their case in court. looks like they could have accommodated the request and chose not to.

If you don't like the fact that we use, deliver, consume alcohol, then GTF out of our country. That's what we do here, and if you're going to take a job, then do the job.

if you don't like the fact that we respect religious convictions and freedom in this country maybe you should GTF out

 

[Rexx Taylor]

awe, shucks, if only it had been a semi, full of 100 angry cows to be delivered to some farm.

 

[ogibillm]

awe, shucks, if only it had been a semi, full of 100 angry cows to be delivered to some farm.

okay, i'm missing it... angry cows?

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

"Muslim truck drivers refuse to deliver beer, get $240,000 in damages"

So you decided to start a thread about it to exhibit your ignorance of the law.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

if that's the case then that accommodation is unreasonable and the company would not have admitted fault.

Just because a company settles doesn't mean they admit fault. It means it's cheaper to just payoff these jokers and be done with it. Companies have insurance for these type of things.

Seems that they did admit fault, part of the agreement. Next time, obey the law. It's cheaper...

Of course. Hiring somebody to do a job and expect them to do it is the employers fault. How silly of me to think otherwise.

again, they're just asking for a reasonable accommodation. if the company sends out say 10 trucks a day and only 2 of them carry alcohol it's not unreasonable to assign the men to one of the other trucks. the company refused to do that.

As a truck driver, your job is to deliver freight. Unless your cargo is illegal, you have no say-so as to what you are to deliver. If you don't want to deliver alcohol, then don't drive a truck.

And if your job is to bake cakes?