More Strong Evidence for Evolution: Anatomical Vestiges

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Name one reputable scientist that claims he has PROOF that a mammal evolved into 2 distinctly different mammal species?

No. You name one that doesn't. One reputable, publishing biologist.

Just one.

So you ADMIT you can not name anyone in the science community that is reputable will make the same claims you made here, thanks for playing

I of course admitted no such thing. I refused.your moronic demand. As evolution is accepted fact and the most robust scientific theory in history, I feel no compulsion whatsoever to acquiesce to your crybaby demands, especially considering this demand was already met, with your predictable tantrum soon following.. Should I also prove water is wet? I should throw a bucket of water over you, and watch you wail and cry and stomp your feet and insist that water is not wet?

But it would certainly be a challenge to name one reputable, publishing bilogist who is publishing science which contradicts evolutionary theory.

In fact, you couldn't do it if your life depended on it.

 

[RetiredGySgt]

Name one reputable scientist that claims he has PROOF that a mammal evolved into 2 distinctly different mammal species?

No. You name one that doesn't. One reputable, publishing biologist.

Just one.

So you ADMIT you can not name anyone in the science community that is reputable will make the same claims you made here, thanks for playing

I of course admitted no such thing. I refused.your moronic demand. As evolution is accepted fact and the most robust scientific theory in history, I feel no compulsive whatsoever to acquiesce to your crybaby demands. Should I also prove water is wet?

But it would certainly be a challenge to name one reputable, oublishing bilogist who is oublishing science which contradicts evolutionary theory.

In fact, you couldn't do it if your life depended on it.

NONE of them say it is fact. NOT one. Or you would post a name with a link to the statement.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

NONE of them say it is fact. NOT one.

Of course, they all do.

 

[Confounding]

Name one reputable scientist that claims he has PROOF that a mammal evolved into 2 distinctly different mammal species?

No. You name one that doesn't. One reputable, publishing biologist.

Just one.

So you ADMIT you can not name anyone in the science community that is reputable will make the same claims you made here, thanks for playing

I of course admitted no such thing. I refused.your moronic demand. As evolution is accepted fact and the most robust scientific theory in history, I feel no compulsive whatsoever to acquiesce to your crybaby demands. Should I also prove water is wet?

But it would certainly be a challenge to name one reputable, oublishing bilogist who is oublishing science which contradicts evolutionary theory.

In fact, you couldn't do it if your life depended on it.

NONE of them say it is fact. NOT one. Or you would post a name with a link to the statement.

Haha

Fort Fun Indiana

It's not a fact dude! It's just a scientific theory!



What a clown. You are wasting your time.

 

[abu afak]

Name one reputable scientist that claims he has PROOF that a mammal evolved into 2 distinctly different mammal species?

You lost Again and...
DISHONESTLY Moved the goal posts again!
Gone from "Physical Evidence" to "Proof".
Deja Vu from yesterday you Moron.
So we KNOW you understand you were full of ****/LOST.

You're cornered/PORKED by Overwhelming EVIDENCE so have to switch to "Proof".

Well you dumb ****head, science doesn't Deal in "Proof".
Only Math has "Proofs".
Science deals in theories affirmed over time.
'Scientific Theories' (NOT plain 'theory'/guess)
are the strongest statements Science can make about the universe.

15 Answers to Creationist Nonsense
John Rennie, Editor in Chief
Scientific American - June 2002
15 Answers to Creationist Nonsense

1. Evolution is only a theory. It is not a fact or a scientific law.

Many people learned in Elementary school that a theory falls in the middle of a hierarchy of certainty--above a mere hypothesis but below a law.
Scientists do Not use the terms that way, however.
According to the National Academy of Sciences (NAS), a scientific theory is "a well-substantiated explanation of some aspect of the natural world that can incorporate facts, laws, inferences, and tested hypotheses." No amount of validation changes a theory into a law, which is a descriptive generalization about nature.
So when scientists talk about the theory of evolution--or the atomic theory or the theory of relativity, for that matter--they are Not expressing reservations about its truth.

In addition to the theory of evolution, meaning the idea of descent with modification, one may also speak of the Fact of evolution.
[......]​

So your IDIOT/IGNORANT challenge is Fallacious/Stupid.

Virtually no biologist will claim he has "Proof", but 99% Understand Evolution is a FACT. Evolution is the central unifying tenet of Biology (NAS)
Facts do not need "proofs".

`

 

[RetiredGySgt]

Proof is all that matters. Without PROOF, like I said it is guesses and assumptions.

 

[jwoodie]

The only proof I have seen on this thread is that the proponents resort to insults and name-calling when challenged, a sure indication of the weakness of their arguments.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Proof is all that matters. Without PROOF, like I said it is guesses and assumptions

Oh gee, I hope the global scientific Community thought of that!

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

The only proof I have seen on this thread is that the proponents resort to insults and name-calling when challenged, a sure

Then you need to clean your monitor.

 

[RetiredGySgt]

The only proof I have seen on this thread is that the proponents resort to insults and name-calling when challenged, a sure

Then you need to clean your monitor.

YOU HAVE ADMITTED you have no proof just assumptions and guesses.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

The only proof I have seen on this thread is that the proponents resort to insults and name-calling when challenged, a sure

Then you need to clean your monitor.

YOU HAVE ADMITTED you have no proof just assumptions and guesses.

I have admitted no such thing. You are embarrassing yourself.

 

[RetiredGySgt]

The only proof I have seen on this thread is that the proponents resort to insults and name-calling when challenged, a sure

Then you need to clean your monitor.

YOU HAVE ADMITTED you have no proof just assumptions and guesses.

I have admitted no such thing. You are embarrassing yourself.

Then PROVIDE PROOF.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

The only proof I have seen on this thread is that the proponents resort to insults and name-calling when challenged, a sure

Then you need to clean your monitor.

YOU HAVE ADMITTED you have no proof just assumptions and guesses.

I have admitted no such thing. You are embarrassing yourself.

Then PROVIDE PROOF.

It has already been provided. You rejected it. Again -- please pay attention -- I will lose no sleep just because some religious nutball stranger on the internet does not accept the fact of evolution. Especially not a lazy, incurious fool who won't bother avail himself of the education of the material possessed by a 10 year old.

 

[james bond]

The only proof I have seen on this thread is that the proponents resort to insults and name-calling when challenged, a sure

Then you need to clean your monitor.

YOU HAVE ADMITTED you have no proof just assumptions and guesses.

I have admitted no such thing. You are embarrassing yourself.

Then PROVIDE PROOF.

It has already been provided. You rejected it. Again -- please pay attention -- I will lose no sleep just because some religious nutball stranger on the internet does not accept the fact of evolution. Especially not a lazy, incurious fool who won't bother avail himself of the education of the material possessed by a 10 year old.

What facts are has been explained to you many times. Evolution is THEORY If something is a fact, then it's objective and real. We can ALL use it such as the sky is blue. However, intelligent people can't use evolution as fact.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Evolution is THEORY

No. Evolution is a scientific theory .It is also a fact.

 

[jwoodie]

The only proof I have seen on this thread is that the proponents resort to insults and name-calling when challenged, a sure

Then you need to clean your monitor.

I just did - by IGNORING you.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

The only proof I have seen on this thread is that the proponents resort to insults and name-calling when challenged, a sure

Then you need to clean your monitor.

I just did - by IGNORING you.

Must be my lucky day.

 

[james bond]

Evolution is THEORY

No. Evolution is a scientific theory .It is also a fact.

The explain why you've gotten dumber while many here have gotten smarter by learning from these threads.

 

[RetiredGySgt]

The only proof I have seen on this thread is that the proponents resort to insults and name-calling when challenged, a sure

Then you need to clean your monitor.

YOU HAVE ADMITTED you have no proof just assumptions and guesses.

I have admitted no such thing. You are embarrassing yourself.

Then PROVIDE PROOF.

It has already been provided. You rejected it. Again -- please pay attention -- I will lose no sleep just because some religious nutball stranger on the internet does not accept the fact of evolution. Especially not a lazy, incurious fool who won't bother avail himself of the education of the material possessed by a 10 year old.

You have linked to things that are NOT proof. You can not link to a single PROVEN fact that a single mammal evolved into 2 distinctly different mammal species.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

The explain why you've gotten dumber while many here have gotten smarter by learning from these threads.

The only people who have gotten smarter are those who have bothered to find material that is new to them which directly contradicts your embarrassing lies.