More "Nothing To See Here Voter Fraud" In Michigan

[ColonelAngus]

Folks, don't listen to the lying media, they are all liars for establishment, the evidence of widespread voter fraud is piling up, don't look to hear anything about this until they have to address it!

HUGE: Analysis Finds Over 10,000 Dead People Returned Mail-In Ballots in Michigan

An analysis of votes in Michigan has found that over 10,000 dead people returned mail-in ballots in the state. The study was conducted by Richard Baris, the director of Big Data Poll. “About 9,500 voters confirmed dead through the Social Security Death Index (SSDI) are marked in the state’s mail...

www.thegatewaypundit.com

Biden really overperformed in the zombie demographic.

Like minds and all

Did I copy You? I am sorry! I will change my shit.

Biden and zombies

Gotcha!

I am slow this evening apparently.

 

[conserveguy877]

The case is on to challenge the Michigan result!

 

[Billiejeens]

Leftists- all the challenges have been rejected

Normal people - post election challenges haven't been heard yet

Leftists- told ya!!!!!!

Normal people - What?

 

[DBA]

You righties don’t even try. Michigan was cleared. It will be certified.

You sure about that?

Lawsuit filed alleging election fraud in Wayne County

Costantino v. Detroit - Great Lakes Justice Center

 

[citygator]

You righties don’t even try. Michigan was cleared. It will be certified.

Being cleared by that maddow guy, does not mean actually mean being cleared.

 

[airplanemechanic]

I read that people born in the 1800's voted in this election.

Yes we know Biden voted.

 

[Dogbiscuit]

You righties don’t even try. Michigan was cleared. It will be certified.

Im wondering if this glitch is just the tip of the iceberg in Michigan

 

[Indeependent]

The Gateway Pundit


Has this Media Source failed a fact check? LET US KNOW HERE.




Share:

QUESTIONABLE SOURCE
A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no sourcing to credible information, a complete lack of transparency and/or is fake news. Fake News is the deliberate attempt to publish hoaxes and/or disinformation for the purpose of profit or influence (Learn More). Sources listed in the Questionable Category may be very untrustworthy and should be fact checked on a per article basis. Please note sources on this list are not considered fake news unless specifically written in the reasoning section for that source. See all Questionable sources.

• Overall, we rate The Gateway Pundit Questionable based on extreme right-wing bias, promotion of conspiracies, and numerous instances of publishing false (fake) news.

The Gateway Pundit - Media Bias/Fact Check

dismissed.

As opposed to the WashedUpCompost?
There is no objective media outlet.

 

[BULLDOG]

 

[LAUGHatLEFTISTS]

The Gateway Pundit


Has this Media Source failed a fact check? LET US KNOW HERE.




Share:

QUESTIONABLE SOURCE
A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no sourcing to credible information, a complete lack of transparency and/or is fake news. Fake News is the deliberate attempt to publish hoaxes and/or disinformation for the purpose of profit or influence (Learn More). Sources listed in the Questionable Category may be very untrustworthy and should be fact checked on a per article basis. Please note sources on this list are not considered fake news unless specifically written in the reasoning section for that source. See all Questionable sources.

• Overall, we rate The Gateway Pundit Questionable based on extreme right-wing bias, promotion of conspiracies, and numerous instances of publishing false (fake) news.

The Gateway Pundit - Media Bias/Fact Check

dismissed.

Yaaaayyy the leftists found a new graph.
Hey dimwit.....cnn and msnbc check all your boxes. ABC
, cbs and nbc check most of them.

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

Translated: Man wearing tin foil hat claims he can talk to dead people and they say they all voted for Biden.

So, what the fuck are you saying? Only dead people can confirm whether they voted?

I knew you were a dumb fuck but this removes all doubt.

 

[Jake Winker Frogen]

Translated: Man wearing tin foil hat claims he can talk to dead people and they say they all voted for Biden.

So, what the fuck are you saying? Only dead people can confirm whether they voted?

I knew you were a dumb fuck but this removes all doubt.

Trump to Barr: "I see dead people. They do not know they are dead. Barr you have to prove they stole the election from me."

 

[citygator]

You righties don’t even try. Michigan was cleared. It will be certified.

Im wondering if this glitch is just the tip of the iceberg in Michigan

No glitch. More fake news.

 

[Billiejeens]

You righties don’t even try. Michigan was cleared. It will be certified.

Im wondering if this glitch is just the tip of the iceberg in Michigan

No glitch. More fake news.

That's not even in question.
Holy fuck the cult has you in a death grip.

 

[Dogbiscuit]

You righties don’t even try. Michigan was cleared. It will be certified.

Im wondering if this glitch is just the tip of the iceberg in Michigan

No glitch. More fake news.

Oh alright, gotcha.

 

[playtime]

The Gateway Pundit


Has this Media Source failed a fact check? LET US KNOW HERE.




Share:

QUESTIONABLE SOURCE
A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no sourcing to credible information, a complete lack of transparency and/or is fake news. Fake News is the deliberate attempt to publish hoaxes and/or disinformation for the purpose of profit or influence (Learn More). Sources listed in the Questionable Category may be very untrustworthy and should be fact checked on a per article basis. Please note sources on this list are not considered fake news unless specifically written in the reasoning section for that source. See all Questionable sources.

• Overall, we rate The Gateway Pundit Questionable based on extreme right-wing bias, promotion of conspiracies, and numerous instances of publishing false (fake) news.

The Gateway Pundit - Media Bias/Fact Check

dismissed.

Instead of wasting my time on your impossibly stupid fucking ass, I'll just post what "FAR LEFT" wikipedia has on your "ahh" debunking source,

Media Bias/Fact Check - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

uh-huh.
there is a reason why wiki is not accepted as a reliable, credible source for university level research.


Sarah Palin Fans Trying To Rewrite Wikipedia History Of Paul Revere's Ride To Match Her Crazy Version
Henry Blodget
Jun. 6, 2011, 10:38 AM

Paul Revere apparently warning the British.
After riffing on Paul Revere's ride during her bus tour last week--and making a couple of basic factual errors--Sarah Palin has responded by arguing that she got the facts right.

Paul Revere was "warning the British" that night, Palin says, refusing to admit that she just worded her riff badly.

(In general, the colonists who opposed the British were, in fact, "warning" the British that they weren't going to stand for the status quo.)

Sarah Palin's fans, meanwhile, have responded by trying to rewrite history, in this case on the Wikipedia page for Paul Revere.

Specifically, they've tried to add citations to support the idea that Revere "rang bells" on his ride. (He didn't).

Fortunately, Wikipedia editors have gotten involved, blocking some of these attempts (see below) (via Little Green Footballs).

Even Palin supporters seem unable to find support for her contention that what Revere was doing that night was "warning the British", though perhaps that argument took place in another forum.

UPDATE: Well, what do you know! According to some historians, Paul Revere was actually detained by the British that night and warned them that they were going to face some resistance from the colonists. So, technically, Sarah Palin was right (assuming these historians are right). Of course, that brief detention was obviously not what Palin was referring to.

Here's a discussion between Wikipedia editors and Palin fans in the Wikipedia forums:

In the article on Paul Revere, someone has added false information in an effort to support Sarah Palin's FALSE claims about Paul Revere.

"Accounts differ regarding the method of alerting the colonists; the generally accepted position is that the warnings were verbal in nature, although one disputed account suggested that Revere rang bells during his ride.[8][9]"

This must be removed as it is a LIE designed to mislead. dj

Dajames (talk) 14:46, 5 June 2011 (UTC)

A lie? If you follow Wikipedia's rules, we must maintain a WP:NEUTRAL position, representing the mainstream position as well as disputed versions. I think the addition represents this fairly -- the mainstream position is that Revere's warnings were verbal, but there are differing accounts that the warnings were done with bells -- with two sources: WDHD television plus a live interview, with a highly influential US politician relating these facts.--Tomwsulcer (talk) 14:50, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
Done. Thank you, I removed the content not backed by a reliable source. --CutOffTies (talk) 14:52, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
[...]

Sarah Palin Fans Trying To Rewrite Wikipedia History Of Paul Revere's Ride To Match Her Crazy Version

 

[playtime]

The Gateway Pundit


Has this Media Source failed a fact check? LET US KNOW HERE.




Share:

QUESTIONABLE SOURCE
A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no sourcing to credible information, a complete lack of transparency and/or is fake news. Fake News is the deliberate attempt to publish hoaxes and/or disinformation for the purpose of profit or influence (Learn More). Sources listed in the Questionable Category may be very untrustworthy and should be fact checked on a per article basis. Please note sources on this list are not considered fake news unless specifically written in the reasoning section for that source. See all Questionable sources.

• Overall, we rate The Gateway Pundit Questionable based on extreme right-wing bias, promotion of conspiracies, and numerous instances of publishing false (fake) news.

The Gateway Pundit - Media Bias/Fact Check

dismissed.

Media Bias/Fact Check is fake news.

Media Bias/Fact Check - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

​

The Columbia Journalism Review describes Media Bias/Fact Check as an amateur attempt at categorizing media bias and Van Zandt as an "armchair media analyst."[3] The Poynter Institute notes, "Media Bias/Fact Check is a widely cited source for news stories and even studies about misinformation, despite the fact that its method is in no way scientific."[5] Alexandra Kitty, in a 2018 book on journalism, described MBFC as an apparent "amateur/civic outfit" and wrote that its founder's only qualification was a degree in communications.[4]​

https://www.newsguardtech.com/wp-co...-Gateway-Pundit-NewsGuard-Nutrition-Label.pdf

The Gateway Pundit Bias and Reliability - Ad Fontes Media

The Gateway Pundit Media Bias Rating

that makes 4 fact checking/ media bias sites that say the same thing.

now you are dismissed as well.

 

[playtime]

The Gateway Pundit


Has this Media Source failed a fact check? LET US KNOW HERE.




Share:

QUESTIONABLE SOURCE
A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no sourcing to credible information, a complete lack of transparency and/or is fake news. Fake News is the deliberate attempt to publish hoaxes and/or disinformation for the purpose of profit or influence (Learn More). Sources listed in the Questionable Category may be very untrustworthy and should be fact checked on a per article basis. Please note sources on this list are not considered fake news unless specifically written in the reasoning section for that source. See all Questionable sources.

• Overall, we rate The Gateway Pundit Questionable based on extreme right-wing bias, promotion of conspiracies, and numerous instances of publishing false (fake) news.

The Gateway Pundit - Media Bias/Fact Check

dismissed.

Yaaaayyy the leftists found a new graph.
Hey dimwit.....cnn and msnbc check all your boxes. ABC
, cbs and nbc check most of them.

lol ... go there & see how they rate the bias of MSNBC or CNN & tell me you disagree.

 

[bripat9643]

The Gateway Pundit


Has this Media Source failed a fact check? LET US KNOW HERE.




Share:

QUESTIONABLE SOURCE
A questionable source exhibits one or more of the following: extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no sourcing to credible information, a complete lack of transparency and/or is fake news. Fake News is the deliberate attempt to publish hoaxes and/or disinformation for the purpose of profit or influence (Learn More). Sources listed in the Questionable Category may be very untrustworthy and should be fact checked on a per article basis. Please note sources on this list are not considered fake news unless specifically written in the reasoning section for that source. See all Questionable sources.

• Overall, we rate The Gateway Pundit Questionable based on extreme right-wing bias, promotion of conspiracies, and numerous instances of publishing false (fake) news.

The Gateway Pundit - Media Bias/Fact Check

dismissed.

Media Bias/Fact Check is fake news.

Media Bias/Fact Check - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

​

The Columbia Journalism Review describes Media Bias/Fact Check as an amateur attempt at categorizing media bias and Van Zandt as an "armchair media analyst."[3] The Poynter Institute notes, "Media Bias/Fact Check is a widely cited source for news stories and even studies about misinformation, despite the fact that its method is in no way scientific."[5] Alexandra Kitty, in a 2018 book on journalism, described MBFC as an apparent "amateur/civic outfit" and wrote that its founder's only qualification was a degree in communications.[4]​

https://www.newsguardtech.com/wp-co...-Gateway-Pundit-NewsGuard-Nutrition-Label.pdf

The Gateway Pundit Bias and Reliability - Ad Fontes Media

The Gateway Pundit Media Bias Rating

that makes 4 fact checking/ media bias sites that say the same thing.

now you are dismissed as well.

Fact check sites are fake news. They are propaganda organs.

 

[Indeependent]

You righties don’t even try. Michigan was cleared. It will be certified.

Being cleared by that maddow guy, does not mean actually mean being cleared.

View attachment 414392

You hit anger the moment Trump tossed his hat into the ring.