Ministers warned of ‘massive’ security risks of Donald Trump presidency

[Tommy Tainant]

Ministers warned of ‘massive’ security risks of Donald Trump presidency

Three of Britain’s former top US diplomats have urged the government to develop contingency plans in case Mr Trump’s bid to return to the White House is successful

www.independent.co.uk

He added: “There’s not much point in saying, ‘We know he’s a monster, he’s unprincipled, he’s a misogynistic fraud and liar and destroyer of constitutions.’ The reality is: he will be there. We have to find ways of engaging with the US if Trump is elected.”

A sobering article.It outlines the threat to world peace of a trump presidency. But how can you discuss security without reference to his stealing security documents ?

The US would have to be excluded from intelligence in order to protect the interests of the western world. That would be necessary but not in the best interests of the US.

 

[Manonthestreet]

Not to worry by the time Joe is done we won't have enough ammo to defend ourselves or anyone

 

[Hollie]

Ministers warned of ‘massive’ security risks of Donald Trump presidency

Three of Britain’s former top US diplomats have urged the government to develop contingency plans in case Mr Trump’s bid to return to the White House is successful

www.independent.co.uk

He added: “There’s not much point in saying, ‘We know he’s a monster, he’s unprincipled, he’s a misogynistic fraud and liar and destroyer of constitutions.’ The reality is: he will be there. We have to find ways of engaging with the US if Trump is elected.”

A sobering article.It outlines the threat to world peace of a trump presidency. But how can you discuss security without reference to his stealing security documents ?

The US would have to be excluded from intelligence in order to protect the interests of the western world. That would be necessary but not in the best interests of the US.

A predictable opinion piece of pandering to the leftist loons coming from the Independent.

 

[buckeye]

A sobering article.It outlines the threat to world peace of a trump presidency. But how can you discuss security without reference to his stealing security documents ?

Threat to world peace???? What is wrong with you? Open your eyes and see the threat to world peace we have experienced since 2021 when the POTUS we have took office.

The inability to live in the real world is a threat to world peace from idiots like you.

 

[ThunderKiss1965]

Ministers warned of ‘massive’ security risks of Donald Trump presidency

Three of Britain’s former top US diplomats have urged the government to develop contingency plans in case Mr Trump’s bid to return to the White House is successful

www.independent.co.uk

He added: “There’s not much point in saying, ‘We know he’s a monster, he’s unprincipled, he’s a misogynistic fraud and liar and destroyer of constitutions.’ The reality is: he will be there. We have to find ways of engaging with the US if Trump is elected.”

A sobering article.It outlines the threat to world peace of a trump presidency. But how can you discuss security without reference to his stealing security documents ?

The US would have to be excluded from intelligence in order to protect the interests of the western world. That would be necessary but not in the best interests of the US.

Trumps a threat but the barely functioning potato who was found to have stored classified material in a card board box in a fucking car garage is ok ? You loons do this shit to yourselves with your hypocrisy and retarded ass claims. No one takes you seriously.

As far as threats to world peace I don't remember any wars Trump has dragged the planet into. Europe and all the old empires have a nasty habit of doing shit that gets a significant fraction of the population murdered.

 

[Mac-7]

Ministers warned of ‘massive’ security risks of Donald Trump presidency

Three of Britain’s former top US diplomats have urged the government to develop contingency plans in case Mr Trump’s bid to return to the White House is successful

www.independent.co.uk

He added: “There’s not much point in saying, ‘We know he’s a monster, he’s unprincipled, he’s a misogynistic fraud and liar and destroyer of constitutions.’ The reality is: he will be there. We have to find ways of engaging with the US if Trump is elected.”

A sobering article.It outlines the threat to world peace of a trump presidency. But how can you discuss security without reference to his stealing security documents ?

The US would have to be excluded from intelligence in order to protect the interests of the western world. That would be necessary but not in the best interests of the US.

Why dont you ask MI-6 to assassinate Trump?

The democrats would thank you

 

[Blaster]

Ministers warned of ‘massive’ security risks of Donald Trump presidency

Three of Britain’s former top US diplomats have urged the government to develop contingency plans in case Mr Trump’s bid to return to the White House is successful

www.independent.co.uk

He added: “There’s not much point in saying, ‘We know he’s a monster, he’s unprincipled, he’s a misogynistic fraud and liar and destroyer of constitutions.’ The reality is: he will be there. We have to find ways of engaging with the US if Trump is elected.”

A sobering article.It outlines the threat to world peace of a trump presidency. But how can you discuss security without reference to his stealing security documents ?

The US would have to be excluded from intelligence in order to protect the interests of the western world. That would be necessary but not in the best interests of the US.

Poor Tommy Boy posts another goofy thread.

 

[luiza]

The US would have to be excluded from intelligence in order to protect the interests of the western world. That would be necessary but not in the best interests of the US.

Speak English you Welsh moron

What the Spooks were advising was the obvious .
Because the UK has also been so heavily involved in Ukraine and Israel , Russia will doubtless inflict revenge in the best way for them and when it suits .

No . They will not be dropping nuclear bombs or sending troops .
There are many better ways of damaging your enemy these days .

CIA and MI6 will be working on the debatable assumption that the US is still not a fragmented mess and therefore blandly imagining that Five Eye protocols will still be operative .
That remains to be seen , but if they are out of commission , the UK and US have only themselves to blame

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Fortunately, a British publication has no more standing nor intellectual basis on which tell tell us Americans anything about how we run our country than does a certain ignorant one-legged British faggot that is very fond of waving its ignorance, lack of standing, and faggotry around like proud banners.

View attachment 883252

Prince Andrew approved

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Ministers warned of ‘massive’ security risks of Donald Trump presidency

Three of Britain’s former top US diplomats have urged the government to develop contingency plans in case Mr Trump’s bid to return to the White House is successful

www.independent.co.uk

He added: “There’s not much point in saying, ‘We know he’s a monster, he’s unprincipled, he’s a misogynistic fraud and liar and destroyer of constitutions.’ The reality is: he will be there. We have to find ways of engaging with the US if Trump is elected.”

A sobering article.It outlines the threat to world peace of a trump presidency. But how can you discuss security without reference to his stealing security documents ?

The US would have to be excluded from intelligence in order to protect the interests of the western world. That would be necessary but not in the best interests of the US.

Nobody gives a fuck about what those losers think

 

[Crepitus]

Wow, you guys are totally in denial of the facts.

tRump was a disaster for the US and the world, and he would be even worse the second time.

Fortunately he hasn't got a snowball's chance in hell of getting near the White House again.

 

[luiza]

Wow, you guys are totally in denial of the facts.

tRump was a disaster for the US and the world, and he would be even worse the second time.

Fortunately he hasn't got a snowball's chance in hell of getting near the White House again.

Attempted wind up or under the influence ?

You are a card , as we say , De CrapitUS

 

[Smokin' OP]

Trump is a walking, talking security disaster.

Trump responds to alleged recording of him showing off ...​

ABC News
https://abcnews.go.com › Politics › story
Jun 19, 2023 — Despite what prosecutors claim in Trump's indictment, he said on Fox News on Monday he hadn't shown a classified document to someone else ...

Of course he lies about it.


"It wasn't a document, OK? I had lots of paper -- I had copies of newspaper articles, I had copies of magazines," he said.

“There was no document. That was a massive amount of papers and everything else talking about Iran and other things. And it may have been held up or may not, but that was not a document," Trump said. "I didn't have a document per se. There was nothing to declassify. These were newspaper stories, magazine stories and articles.”

 

[EvilCat Breath]

Three FORMER, ANONYMOUS, ministers.... means the paper made it up.

 

[Tommy Tainant]

Three FORMER, ANONYMOUS, ministers.... means the paper made it up.

They are all named in the article. And they arent ministers. They are warning ministers. Your inability to read explains your support for a crook.Thick fucker.

 

[Tommy Tainant]

Trump is a walking, talking security disaster.

Trump responds to alleged recording of him showing off ...​

View attachment 883265
ABC News
https://abcnews.go.com › Politics › story
Jun 19, 2023 — Despite what prosecutors claim in Trump's indictment, he said on Fox News on Monday he hadn't shown a classified document to someone else ...

Of course he lies about it.


"It wasn't a document, OK? I had lots of paper -- I had copies of newspaper articles, I had copies of magazines," he said.

“There was no document. That was a massive amount of papers and everything else talking about Iran and other things. And it may have been held up or may not, but that was not a document," Trump said. "I didn't have a document per se. There was nothing to declassify. These were newspaper stories, magazine stories and articles.”

This is the key point. Even if you discount him being a putin stooge he is still a threat. He is erratic. How could the world trust him ?
Its just too big a risk. What would the fuckwit do next ? His own security service doesnt trust him.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

They are all named in the article. And they arent ministers. They are warning ministers. Your inability to read explains your support for a crook.Thick fucker.

The only ones named are three men who believe Trump will win again. Not the ones who made the bogus warning. Learn to read in English. Gullible fuck.

 

[drudge X]

These leftists are afraid of their shadow.

 

[Smokin' OP]

This is the key point. Even if you discount him being a putin stooge he is still a threat. He is erratic. How could the world trust him ?
Its just too big a risk. What would the fuckwit do next ? His own security service doesnt trust him.

If ANYONE trusts Trump, the morons deserve what they get.

 

[Tommy Tainant]

If ANYONE trusts Trump, the morons deserve what they get.

America has rejected trump twice. The president should be the guy who gets the most votes.
You need to redraft your constitution to prvent nutters taking control.