Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You learned all that from a Flintstones episode ? Cool.The towers came down exactly opposite of controlled demolition. Controlled demolition is bottom to top. The main supports at the bottom and the building collapses, all at the same time, from bottom to top with kicker charges break up the debris as it collapses.
But the towers came down from the point of impact down......with the debris field destroying each floor individually, one at a time, all the way to the ground. With the lower floors destoyed last.
Exactly opposite of controlled demolition.
So the title and OP speak for themselves.So vague allusions to.....what? If even you can't openly and clearly state your claims, why would we take them seriously?
You learned all that from a Flintstones episode ? Cool.The towers came down exactly opposite of controlled demolition. Controlled demolition is bottom to top. The main supports at the bottom and the building collapses, all at the same time, from bottom to top with kicker charges break up the debris as it collapses.
But the towers came down from the point of impact down......with the debris field destroying each floor individually, one at a time, all the way to the ground. With the lower floors destoyed last.
Exactly opposite of controlled demolition.
So the title and OP speak for themselves.So vague allusions to.....what? If even you can't openly and clearly state your claims, why would we take them seriously?
If you're just here to spout the usual arrogant sarcasm
aimed at anyone who dares question the official narrative then
run along please.
The towers came down exactly opposite of controlled demolition. Controlled demolition is bottom to top. The main supports at the bottom and the building collapses, all at the same time, from bottom to top with kicker charges break up the debris as it collapses.
But the towers came down from the point of impact down......with the debris field destroying each floor individually, one at a time, all the way to the ground. With the lower floors destoyed last.
Exactly opposite of controlled demolition.
The last thing I want is to be taken seriously and targeted by a team of goons.You learned all that from a Flintstones episode ? Cool.The towers came down exactly opposite of controlled demolition. Controlled demolition is bottom to top. The main supports at the bottom and the building collapses, all at the same time, from bottom to top with kicker charges break up the debris as it collapses.
But the towers came down from the point of impact down......with the debris field destroying each floor individually, one at a time, all the way to the ground. With the lower floors destoyed last.
Exactly opposite of controlled demolition.
No, watching actual demolitions. They knock out the main supports at its base and the building, all at the same time, falls. Kicker charges are used to break up the debris as its falling.
Here's a lovely example, in slow mo. Notice how the entire building is falling all at the same time. The lower levels, the mid levels, the upper levels...all together. With the bottom destroyed first.
Which isn't how the towers fell at all. The collapse initiated at the point of impact with the planes and continued down, destroying one floor at a time, all the way to the ground. With the bottom of the towers being last part destroyed. In fact, that's where the survivors were actually found: at the bottom of the tower.
Exactly opposite of controlled demolition.
So the title and OP speak for themselves.So vague allusions to.....what? If even you can't openly and clearly state your claims, why would we take them seriously?
If you're just here to spout the usual arrogant sarcasm
aimed at anyone who dares question the official narrative then
run along please.
So no, you can't actually make any specific accusation against Silverstein, nor back them up. You just vaguely allude to....something. Which you won't actually say.
If you're ever curious why you're not being taken seriously, that's definitely a reason.
The towers came down exactly opposite of controlled demolition. Controlled demolition is bottom to top. The main supports at the bottom and the building collapses, all at the same time, from bottom to top with kicker charges break up the debris as it collapses.
But the towers came down from the point of impact down......with the debris field destroying each floor individually, one at a time, all the way to the ground. With the lower floors destoyed last.
Exactly opposite of controlled demolition.You learned all that from a Flintstones episode ? Cool.The towers came down exactly opposite of controlled demolition. Controlled demolition is bottom to top. The main supports at the bottom and the building collapses, all at the same time, from bottom to top with kicker charges break up the debris as it collapses.
But the towers came down from the point of impact down......with the debris field destroying each floor individually, one at a time, all the way to the ground. With the lower floors destoyed last.
Exactly opposite of controlled demolition.
No, watching actual demolitions. They knock out the main supports at its base and the building, all at the same time, falls. Kicker charges are used to break up the debris as its falling.
Here's a lovely example, in slow mo. Notice how the entire building is falling all at the same time. The lower levels, the mid levels, the upper levels...all together. With the bottom destroyed first.
Which isn't how the towers fell at all. The collapse initiated at the point of impact with the planes and continued down, destroying one floor at a time, all the way to the ground. With the bottom of the towers being last part destroyed. In fact, that's where the survivors were actually found: at the bottom of the tower.
Exactly opposite of controlled demolition.
So the title and OP speak for themselves.So vague allusions to.....what? If even you can't openly and clearly state your claims, why would we take them seriously?
If you're just here to spout the usual arrogant sarcasm
aimed at anyone who dares question the official narrative then
run along please.
So no, you can't actually make any specific accusation against Silverstein, nor back them up. You just vaguely allude to....something. Which you won't actually say.
If you're ever curious why you're not being taken seriously, that's definitely a reason.
https://www.bollyn.com/public/Solving_9-11_-_The_Deception_That_Changed_The_World.pdf
There would be, for example, no reporting in the mainstream media of Israeli involvement or prior knowledge of the attacks. And this was just the beginning of the censorship the controlled media was to impose on the events of 9-11.
The possibility that these men could be Israeli intelligence agents involved in a spectacular "false flag" terror attack was discussed in my article that went to print in the American Free Press on September 20, 2001. It was the only newspaper in the United States where such thoughts could openly be expressed.
Months later, Forward, a well known New York-based Jewish newspaper, confirmed that Urban Moving Systems, the Weehawken, New Jersey-based "moving" company that the men worked for, was actually an Israeli intelligence front operation and that at least two of the men, evidently the Kurzberg brothers, were known agents of Mossad, Israel's military intelligence agency. Dominic Suter, the Israeli "owner" of the company and a prime suspect, was somehow allowed to flee to Israel after the Federal Bureau of Investigation had initially interviewed him, but before they could interrogate him a second time.
He has not been extradited to the United States since. After being held for 10 weeks, the five Israelis were sent back to Israel on visa violations. Ellner, Marmari, and Schmuel appeared on an Israeli television show, without the Kurzberg brothers, in November 2001.
The last thing I want is to be taken seriously and targeted by a team of goons.If you're ever curious why you're not being taken seriously, that's definitely a reason.
The last thing I want is to be taken seriously and targeted by a team of goons.If you're ever curious why you're not being taken seriously, that's definitely a reason.
With anyone who disagrees with your conclusions and points out the huge, theory killing holes in the proposed explanations being a 'goon'?
You don't handle contradiction well at all, do you?
Troll alert.Some of the most important questions in history as a matter of fact.
Here again is the fateful day that changed the world .
In 4:46.
Traces of explosives in 9/11 dust, scientists say.
9/11 Explosive Connections - The 9/11 Masterminds
Architect Richard Gage destroys the official 9/11 narrative.
Mathematician to Refute Official Theory of WTC Destruction at Upcoming Conference
The last thing I want is to be taken seriously and targeted by a team of goons.If you're ever curious why you're not being taken seriously, that's definitely a reason.
With anyone who disagrees with your conclusions and points out the huge, theory killing holes in the proposed explanations being a 'goon'?
You don't handle contradiction well at all, do you?
The last thing I want is to be taken seriously and targeted by a team of goons.If you're ever curious why you're not being taken seriously, that's definitely a reason.
With anyone who disagrees with your conclusions and points out the huge, theory killing holes in the proposed explanations being a 'goon'?
You don't handle contradiction well at all, do you?
You punks always have to lie .....I've been spanking you fuckers since 2004 on various political forums.When I point out that the towers came down exactly opposite of controlled demotion, you flee.
You punks always have to lie .....I've been spanking you fuckers since 2004 on various political forums.When I point out that the towers came down exactly opposite of controlled demotion, you flee.
So before you continue patronizing me, I've heard every spin you can toss my way, but if you want to play , bring it. For every lie you spit out I'll stomp on it with 50 truths.
Traces of explosives in 9/11 dust, scientists say.
9/11 Explosive Connections - The 9/11 Masterminds
Architect Richard Gage destroys the official 9/11 narrative.
Mathematician to Refute Official Theory of WTC Destruction at Upcoming Conference
You punks always have to lie .....I've been spanking you fuckers since 2004 on various political forums.When I point out that the towers came down exactly opposite of controlled demotion, you flee.
So before you continue patronizing me, I've heard every spin you can toss my way, but if you want to play , bring it. For every lie you spit out I'll stomp on it with 50 truths.
Traces of explosives in 9/11 dust, scientists say.
9/11 Explosive Connections - The 9/11 Masterminds
Architect Richard Gage destroys the official 9/11 narrative.
Mathematician to Refute Official Theory of WTC Destruction at Upcoming Conference
Thermite doesn't explode, Angelo. It burns at high temperatures. And extremely brightly. In fact, looking right at a thermite reaction can damage your eyes.
Thermite reactions are absolutely and completely obvious. And with 47 core columns and 240 perimeter columns per floor and the tower coming down from the point of impact with the planes to the ground, each floor would have had to been destroyed individually. That's roughly 90 floors on one tower and about 80 on the other, that would have been nearly 50,000 individual thermite reactions that would have needed to have gone off.
With the 240 perimeter columns are on the outside of the building, exposed to open air. So when the 10s or thousands of thermite reactions went off, they would have lit the WTC towers so brightly you would have been able to see the light from orbit.
Yet.....nothing. Not a single thermite reaction was ever seen. Despite your theory requiring 10s of thousands of them.
Thermite is an absolutely terrible explanation of the collapse of the towers. Thermite doesn't explode. Thermite is obvious. 3/4 of the columns destroyed would have been exposed to open air and the visible by any camera. Yet nothing.
And you can't explain any of these theory killing holes in your theory.
And there are so many more holes in the stupid, stupid Truther theory. Shall we go over them together? Or are you just gonna spam something you don't understand, and have never read.....again
Saying, "pull it." A term never used in a controlled demolition and said to firemen who don't perform controlled demolitions to bring down a building that was expected to fall for no less than 5 hours after a 104 story building rained thousands of tons of concrete and steel upon it.Demolition Access To The WTC Towers: Part Two - Security - 911Truth.Org %
Larry Silverstein owned WTC building 7, and in May 2001, he also finalized a 99-year lease of the WTC complex and took over operation of WTC buildings 1, 2, 4 and 5 from the PANYNJ. His partners in the deal were retail operator Westfield America and real estate investor Lloyd Goldman. To finance his deal for the WTC, “Silverstein borrowed $726 million from GMAC Commercial Mortgage, a unit of General Motors. GMAC in turn converted the loan into securities, which it sold to investors like pension funds.” [123]
Alan Reiss of the PANYNJ had been working on a three-month transition plan with a team including Silverstein Properties, in the weeks before 9/11. Just before the attacks, the Silverstein group had asked Reiss to let it more fully operate all systems, from safety systems to tenant relations. [124]
Silverstein had hired someone to run the WTC complex for him. This was Geoffrey (Jeff) Wharton, who came to Silverstein Properties from Tishman Speyer, one of the city’s biggest office landlords. Wharton was in charge of the buildings when they were destroyed, and stayed with Silverstein for only one year after that. [125]
Wharton had been in the north tower at the Windows on the World restaurant where he had breakfast every day, and was said to be on the last elevator to descend, at 8:44 AM. He greeted and left behind the new PANYNJ executive director, Neil Levin, who was there waiting for someone although he had not been seen there before. [126] Shortly thereafter, it was Jeff Wharton that first told Larry Silverstein about the attacks. But Silverstein watched it all play out on television. Although Silverstein was said to be distressed by the loss of four of his employees, at the same time, “in a display of shrewdness, Silverstein was already delving into complex legal strategies by the next morning.” [127]
Wharton was a friend of Jerome Hauer, and through Hauer, Silverstein and Wharton met and hired an FBI agent named John O’Neill to run security. [128] It was reported that O’Neill “started out as an FBI support employee and worked his way up to titles such as assistant special agent in charge and section chief in charge of the counterterrorism division. In his 31-year career with the FBI, John O’Neill investigated nearly every terrorist attack aver attributed to Al Qaeda, many of those under the direction and close supervision of FBI Director Louis Freeh. “O’Neill … had been a key part of the investigation of the World Trade Center bombing in 1993, the Oklahoma City bombing in 1995, the embassy bombings in Kenya and Tanzania in 1998 and the attack on the USS Cole in Yemen last year.” [129]
O’Neill was known to dress like a gangster, and to fraternize with gangsters. He was also dating several women at the same time and was lying to all of them. A few weeks before 9/11, O’Neill got serious about returning to his Catholic faith and began going to mass every day. He repeatedly told people that he felt something was going to happen. On his second day at his WTC office, on the 34th floor, O’Neill was killed when the attacks occurred, although not immediately. It was reported that O’Neill escaped the building but returned in an attempt to help others.
In 2007, Larry Silverstein was awarded a $4.55 billion settlement in insurance payouts for the destruction of the WTC, as a result of the largest insurance claim ever made.
What exactly are you accusing Silverstein of?
Another lie. Building 7 was 200 yards away from ground zero.Saying, "pull it." A term never used in a controlled demolition and said to firemen who don't perform controlled demolitions to bring down a building that was expected to fall for no less than 5 hours after a 104 story building rained thousands of tons of concrete and steel upon it.
You punks always have to lie .....I've been spanking you fuckers since 2004 on various political forums.When I point out that the towers came down exactly opposite of controlled demotion, you flee.
So before you continue patronizing me, I've heard every spin you can toss my way, but if you want to play , bring it. For every lie you spit out I'll stomp on it with 50 truths.
Traces of explosives in 9/11 dust, scientists say.
9/11 Explosive Connections - The 9/11 Masterminds
Architect Richard Gage destroys the official 9/11 narrative.
Mathematician to Refute Official Theory of WTC Destruction at Upcoming Conference
Thermite doesn't explode, Angelo. It burns at high temperatures. And extremely brightly. In fact, looking right at a thermite reaction can damage your eyes.
Thermite reactions are absolutely and completely obvious. And with 47 core columns and 240 perimeter columns per floor and the tower coming down from the point of impact with the planes to the ground, each floor would have had to been destroyed individually. That's roughly 90 floors on one tower and about 80 on the other, that would have been nearly 50,000 individual thermite reactions that would have needed to have gone off.
With the 240 perimeter columns are on the outside of the building, exposed to open air. So when the 10s or thousands of thermite reactions went off, they would have lit the WTC towers so brightly you would have been able to see the light from orbit.
Yet.....nothing. Not a single thermite reaction was ever seen. Despite your theory requiring 10s of thousands of them.
Thermite is an absolutely terrible explanation of the collapse of the towers. Thermite doesn't explode. Thermite is obvious. 3/4 of the columns destroyed would have been exposed to open air and the visible by any camera. Yet nothing.
And you can't explain any of these theory killing holes in your theory.
And there are so many more holes in the stupid, stupid Truther theory. Shall we go over them together? Or are you just gonna spam something you don't understand, and have never read.....again
Just connecting dots.
Liar ... 200 yards is 2 football fields. In reality, a realm you haven't seen in years, building 7 was across the street from building 6 which was adjacent to the North Tower...Another lie. Building 7 was 200 yards away from ground zero.Saying, "pull it." A term never used in a controlled demolition and said to firemen who don't perform controlled demolitions to bring down a building that was expected to fall for no less than 5 hours after a 104 story building rained thousands of tons of concrete and steel upon it.
The north face was hit with the dust tsunami but fire didn't bring it down.
You punks always have to lie .....I've been spanking you fuckers since 2004 on various political forums.When I point out that the towers came down exactly opposite of controlled demotion, you flee.
So before you continue patronizing me, I've heard every spin you can toss my way, but if you want to play , bring it. For every lie you spit out I'll stomp on it with 50 truths.
Traces of explosives in 9/11 dust, scientists say.
9/11 Explosive Connections - The 9/11 Masterminds
Architect Richard Gage destroys the official 9/11 narrative.
Mathematician to Refute Official Theory of WTC Destruction at Upcoming Conference
Thermite doesn't explode, Angelo. It burns at high temperatures. And extremely brightly. In fact, looking right at a thermite reaction can damage your eyes.
Thermite reactions are absolutely and completely obvious. And with 47 core columns and 240 perimeter columns per floor and the tower coming down from the point of impact with the planes to the ground, each floor would have had to been destroyed individually. That's roughly 90 floors on one tower and about 80 on the other, that would have been nearly 50,000 individual thermite reactions that would have needed to have gone off.
With the 240 perimeter columns are on the outside of the building, exposed to open air. So when the 10s or thousands of thermite reactions went off, they would have lit the WTC towers so brightly you would have been able to see the light from orbit.
Yet.....nothing. Not a single thermite reaction was ever seen. Despite your theory requiring 10s of thousands of them.
Thermite is an absolutely terrible explanation of the collapse of the towers. Thermite doesn't explode. Thermite is obvious. 3/4 of the columns destroyed would have been exposed to open air and the visible by any camera. Yet nothing.
And you can't explain any of these theory killing holes in your theory.
And there are so many more holes in the stupid, stupid Truther theory. Shall we go over them together? Or are you just gonna spam something you don't understand, and have never read.....again
Just connecting dots.
