Mankeeping

[Midnight FM]

Feminism is what destroyed the dating and marriage landscape. Totally relevant because it is the root cause.

Not at all. I don't think that you know what feminism is.

The lie of feminism taught girls it was better to go to college and then work for a corporation their whole youth instead of just getting married and having kids

It is better. If a person can't aspire to anything more than being breeding stock, that's not particularly encouraging.

like women did since the Beginning.

Women who come from wealthy and educated families have been having fewer children since the beginning. Think powerful women such as Queen Cleopatra.

The reality is that poorer and less educated women have been the ones having more children, and many aspects of having children are an outdated holdover from the undeveloped world, where threats to the survival of the population were much more common than they are in the developed world.

It taught women that they were free to commit adultery and have abortions with no consequences. When in reality it makes them adulteresses and murderers in the eyes of God.

Nope. Aborting a zygote which has no brain isn't murder, and the God of the Biblical Old Testament killed many children:

1 Samuel 15:3 - Saul's Disobedience

Now go and attack the Amalekites and devote to destruction all that belongs to them. Do not spare them, but put to death men and women, children and infants, oxen and sheep, camels and donkeys.'

biblehub.com

Now go and smite Amalek, and utterly destroy all that they have, and spare them not; but slay both man and woman, infant and suckling, ox and sheep, camel and ass.

I'm not aware of "feminism telling women to commit adultery", or to cheat on their spouse, but many aspects of marriage are outdated to begin with.

You don't even know God, so don't talk about things you don't understand.

It is the biggest lie of the last century.

Your idiotic posts are the biggest lie of the last century.

Wrong. 20s are the perfect time to get married and start having kids.

You're exceedingly out of date. Marriage is a legal institution which is out of date in many regards. And we don't want women wasting their time having unnecessary kids. As an example:

 

[Midnight FM]

Feminism is not feminine. It's a lie which is why I disagree with it.

Nope. The Republican party is full of feminists like Marjorie Taylor Greene who value having a career in the public sphere over reducing themselves to breeding stock. Women in America don't wear burkas. They pursue literacy, education, and careers - all things which are aspects of feminism.

If you want to avoid feminism, you'll need to move to Saudi Arabia or Iran.

 

[Midnight FM]

As it is, I have three close relatives that work in the high school system, 3 different cities. One is my wife.
They all 100% would say that 30% is not a surprise at all, and seems about right.
Near a majority of the males are "dough boys" - overweight, out of shape, dress like slobs and don't care about anything other than video games and/or fantasy games. They don't even look at girls.

And there are plenty of "dough girls" out there for them to date.

So your scenario doesn't hold much water. It just sounds like fearmongering to me.

 

[Midnight FM]

“Mankeeping” sounds like nothing more than the traditional gender roles and duties of a woman in a heterosexual relationship. Women have always been the more emotionally involved, plan-making and supportive/nurturing ones in the relationship.

There's no such thing as "traditional gender roles and duties". What is considered a "tradition" or a "role" is going to very heavily from culture to culture.

There are biological differences between men and women, so there may be some things which women tend to naturally do at statistically higher rates than men, but this has nothing to do with reducing women as individuals to the level of archaic and repressive "roles".

The problem is that these women are stealing time and energy away from those tasks with this ridiculous crusade to have lives of their own.

No, the problem is that they're wasting time on these outdated gender roles and duties.

 

[Midnight FM]

The real disaster, for women, is that 'feminism' is not feminine. Men avoid feminists like the plague.

America is a feminist country, and most Americans are dating and married. So that lacks any substantiating.

Also feminism has robbed women of their natural gift of having and raising children and being supported by a committed man.

Many aspects of having children are just an outdated holdover of our hardscrabble past, when life expectancy was lower and there were constant threats to our survival as a species.

This is why people have fewer children in the developed world than they do in 3rd world countries where no sane person would want to reside.

We don't need men or women aspiring to do nothing other than produce and support offspring. Society would be better off if people had higher aspirations.

Feminism has degraded child birth and motherhood which is the reason we exist in the first place.

No, rather, we exist as a free society because of people who devoted themselves to championing rights and freedoms, not reducing themselves to the level of breeding stock and offering little else of social value, as we see in 3rd world countries such as Saudi Arabia and Iran.

Human sexuality (not LBGTQ) is interdependent and fatherhood has been denigrated.

"Fatherhood" is often just the result of people not bothering to use birth control.

Whether or not human sexuality is "interdependent" has nothing to do with "feminism" or a lack thereof, to my knowledge.

 

[Leo123]

Nope. The Republican party is full of feminists like Marjorie Taylor Greene who value having a career in the public sphere over reducing themselves to breeding stock. Women in America don't wear burkas. They pursue literacy, education, and careers - all things which are aspects of feminism.

If you want to avoid feminism, you'll need to move to Saudi Arabia or Iran.

Why do you refer to women who want to have children as 'breeding stock?' What's wrong with a woman who cherishes her husband and children? What's wrong with a man being the sole provider? Isn't that the way humans were designed? We really need to stop denigrating stay at home mothers.

 

[Midnight FM]

What women want is ALWAYS complicated. 'Shared effort' means listening to women prattle on about all the shit she hates and all the shit a man can do nothing about.

"Complicated" is entirely subjective, and just boils down to whether or not a person is capable of understanding it.

Emotional responsibility is bullshit, men are not responsible for women's emotions. A man choosing 'solitude over stress' means he's tired of hearing her *****.

Basically, you're just bitching and moaning.

 

[Midnight FM]

Why do you refer to women who want to have children as 'breeding stock?' What's wrong with a woman who cherishes her husband and children?

They're outdated. We live in a free society where people have the rights and freedoms to actualize themselves, so that's what they should do.

What's wrong with a man being the sole provider?

See above.

Isn't that the way humans were designed?

No.

We really need to stop denigrating stay at home mothers.

If people aspired to do more than breed, which is something that any animal is capable of, society would be better off.

 

[Leo123]

America is a feminist country, and most Americans are dating and married. So that lacks any substantiating.


Many aspects of having children are just an outdated holdover of our hardscrabble past, when life expectancy was lower and there were constant threats to our survival as a species.

This is why people have fewer children in the developed world than they do in 3rd world countries where no sane person would want to reside.

We don't need men or women aspiring to do nothing other than produce and support offspring. Society would be better off if people had higher aspirations.


No, rather, we exist as a free society because of people who devoted themselves to championing rights and freedoms, not reducing themselves to the level of breeding stock and offering little else of social value, as we see in 3rd world countries such as Saudi Arabia and Iran.


"Fatherhood" is often just the result of people not bothering to use birth control.

Whether or not human sexuality is "interdependent" has nothing to do with "feminism" or a lack thereof, to my knowledge.

Where do you get that America is a feminist country? Which aspects of child bearing a child raising are outdated holdovers? What an insane comment.

No one said we need men and women who only aspire to produce or support offspring. What we need are people who do not denigrate it, like you do.

So according to you, everyone in your so-called 3rd world countries is insane. That is sick.

Fatherhood is the opposite of being a 'sperm donor' which you, no doubt support. Who says people in a free society who devote themselves to their spouse and family do not champion rights and freedoms?

Your knowledge is sparse. Feminism degrades interdependence of heterosexual couples because it lifts one sex above the other.

 

[Leo123]

And there are plenty of "dough girls" out there for them to date.

So your scenario doesn't hold much water. It just sounds like fearmongering to me.

Rich doughboys can have good looking wives. Rich Doughgirls are just sloppy, ugly, feminist and fat.

 

[Midnight FM]

Where do you get that America is a feminist country?

Most American women are literate.

Most American women have careers.

American women have rights and freedoms under the law.

American women have fewer children than women in impoverished countries do.

Our history of feminism has made these things a reality.

Which aspects of child bearing a child raising are outdated holdovers? What an insane comment.

No one said we need men and women who only aspire to produce or support offspring. What we need are people who do not denigrate it, like you do.

I do denigrate people who can't aspire to anything other than producing offspring.

It doesn't require much in the way of IQ points.

So according to you, everyone in your so-called 3rd world countries is insane. That is sick.

People in 3rd world countries are often uneducated and impoverished, and have had their rights and freedoms repressed by society or the state.

So, yes, you'll find plenty of breeders there, but not many inventors or entrepreneurs.

Fatherhood is the opposite of being a 'sperm donor' which you, no doubt support.

If you mean sexual freedom, then, yes, I do support that. We don't sex being reduced to a survivalistic biological function.

Who says people in a free society who devote themselves to their spouse and family do not champion rights and freedoms.

Basically, you have people who don't aspire to do anything other than breed. And, on the flip side, you have people who aspire to higher things, such as the establishment of rights and freedoms.

If more people were the latter, society would benefit from the result.

Your knowledge is sparse. Feminism degrades interdependence of heterosexual couples because it lifts one sex above the other.

Feminism is about establishing equal rights for women.

So no, it doesn't "lift one sex above the other". It is outdated views on sex and gender which do that.

 

[Midnight FM]

Rich doughboys can have good looking wives.

So can poor ones.

Rich Doughgirls are just sloppy, ugly, feminist and fat.

"Feminist" is just a buzzword which means anything you don't like, and has little bearing on anything resembling an academic definition.

 

[Midnight FM]

Because the Public School System does its best to Neuter boys.

Unsubstantiated. But that's a given.

The "public school system" is funded by both Republicans and Democrats. And you haven't substantiated why a private school would be in different in that regard, or what "neutering boys" even means.

 

[MayorQuimby]

It's quite telling that those who the Creepy Ones in Canada recruit for covert activities against others are majority women. They've been socialized to not care about such issues as civil liberties and human rights, the police profit off of this to expand their nets of dishonesty. It's like Reality TV show for some "hey, get the better of them, look out for yourself!".

It is very, very true that women don't care about stuff like that, however, I believe that the move to recruit them for covert activities is a terrible one. For one obvious reason: women tend to be very incompetent. At almost everything I can think of. Think of any area of human expertise, and you will see that all the top people are men.

Women are only good for being honey pots for the CSIS.

Mental health is in the crapper these days.

Mental illness is rising all around, especially in the younger generations.

For example, since the gender cult has been preached at your local state run school, gender confusion has risen 4000% amongst children and disproportionately effects girls, about 9 to 1. It used to be that only middle-aged men suffered from gender dysphoria, but now children outnumber them by a large number.

This is planned deliberately. They put in these programs and counsellors or whatever, saying they want to help students with gender euphoria so that they would not commit suicide. Well, it's a load of crap. What these programs actually do, is they subtly put ideas in kids' heads that they might be gender-confused. And then they hint at them to transition. This is all done deliberately to devastate the white population.

I don't care what you put on those phones, it is not healthy being on them 24/7

And they use AI to study the individual with the sole purpose of keeping on those phones

The scary part is, AI is in it's infancy, and it is already destroying the human race.

But for the Left, this is a good thing, anything to save the planet I reckon.

The Left does not give a shit about saving the planet. What they actually want is to kill off white people (though non-violently). They give some bullshit reason because if they came right out with their real intention, they'd get in trouble.

Also due to lack of physical activity which measurably lowers testosterone. Lack of testosterone = lower sex drive. Add this to your valid point.

There could be other causes for the low T. For example, all the stuff your government put in your water, it can't be good for you. If the government wants you to drink water that they laced with something, its gotta be poison.

Untrue, but you wish you had a moar glandular production...

Why are you still not banned, you ******* trash.

I can help you to learn how to pick up chicks, it's not that hard, just find a mutual interest and spend, spend, spend.

Is it because women respond only to your money, and nothing else?

True, I started in Jr. High.

That is ghetto behavior and you are proud of it, lmao.

Is it shit policies or is it just capitalism?

Neither. It's anti-white racism. Those at the top want white people gone.

If you think being gay or bisexual means you don't want to have sex, holy shit you don't know any gay or bisexual people.

You're an idiot if you think that's what he said.

Being gay/bisexual is a form of sexual deviancy, it's a part of the suite of the sex and procreation related crisis that we see today. And not wanting to have sex is yet another symptom of this suite. So, there is a connection between being gay/bi and not wanting sex.

You want more high school kids to procreate?

Actually, that is what had been happening for a very large part of human history.

Sure it does. Capitalism says we work on weekends to get ahead of the competition.

And why should we get ahead of the competition? So that we can sacrifice our quality of life so as to make our bosses richer?

You sound like you really enjoy being an economic *****.

If you suck, have no work ethics or drive to do better - correct.
For the rest of us - that is not true, at all

I see, so people who struggle are all beneath you and they all deserve it and furthermore you don't give a shit about their plight.

I hear ya.

I wouldn't. The whole idea is to explore who you're attracted to. That would increase the frequency of people connecting.

I do NOT want to hear the word "explore" again, especially when it comes with "your sexuality".

That's just a nicer way of saying **** around and find out what kind of deviant lifestyle you might enjoy.

I don't need to "explore" shit. I know what I like. Can you say the same, you little commie *****?

The right just wants a scapegoat and will look for any excuse to blame LGBTQ for anything they can.

Blame the LGBTQ? Dude, you are giving these freaks way too much credit. you see, in order to be able to be blamed for something, one would actually have some sort of power. Some sort of agency. Some sort of influence. These freaks have none of those.

But the whole thread is premised on the idea that men in particular aren't socializing like they used to. Finding out why is probably way more important than whining about gay and bisexual people.

But if people want to talk about gays? Do they need your permission first?

******* lefty piece of shit always acting like they are some kind of ******* authority. Get FUCKED, you ******* piece of lefty shit.

 

[Marener]

Man, it’s just page after page of trying to blame women for all of men’s problems.

That’s pretty ******* weak.

Why don’t guys have friends anymore? That’s the real question here.

 

[Midnight FM]

1/3rd of people is a lot. You're just saying shit.

It's not "1/3rd of people". It's 1/3rd of a small group of people surveyed.

There's a lot of people that might consider dominating women to be a part of traditional masculinity.

I believe that, biologically, there are things about men which tend to fall into the more "dominant" category, but doesn't and shouldn't mean physically or otherwise abusing women.

There's also a lot of people that don't think reading books are part of traditional masculinity. Being educated, especially in liberal arts, has been denigrated for years by conservatism.

And that has no bearing on history or reality.

The reality is that, historically, and even presently, "powerful men", such as Kings and Emperors were always more literate and educated than men of the lower classes, who were often relegated to the role of slaves.

So, while anyone on the internet can say that "traditional masculinity" means this or that, the reality is that it usually just means whatever one wants it to.

I think there is a huge problem with the deemphasis on community, in society at large but in particular with men. Men are told that they shouldn't seek help and if they need it, that they're weak.

I would agree to some extent.

Man, it’s just page after page of trying to blame women for all of men’s problems.

That’s pretty ******* weak.

Why don’t guys have friends anymore? That’s the real question here.

Right, most discussions about the issue are rubbish, and there's nothing resembling a factual take on the "issues", assuming the "issues" are even real, and usually they aren't.

 

[MayorQuimby]

Why do you refer to women who want to have children as 'breeding stock?' What's wrong with a woman who cherishes her husband and children? What's wrong with a man being the sole provider? Isn't that the way humans were designed? We really need to stop denigrating stay at home mothers.

Because he's a fed sleeper agent cum lefty trash who likes to put a negative spin on motherhood so as to get white girls not to get married and have children.

Just stop engaging him. He's a walking, talking, piece of trash.

Man, it’s just page after page of trying to blame women for all of men’s problems.

That’s pretty ******* weak.

Why don’t guys have friends anymore? That’s the real question here.

So, zero response to my various and very dominant, testosterone-fueled arguments, huh? Sounds like I have defeated your little lefty ***** ass again. Mmmm. Sweet, sweet victory.

 

[The Duke]

One of the best things about growing old as a man is you start to look like Sean Connery. One of the worst things about growing old as a woman is you start to look like Sean Connery.
View attachment 1141950

 

[The Duke]

Why do you refer to women who want to have children as 'breeding stock?' What's wrong with a woman who cherishes her husband and children? What's wrong with a man being the sole provider? Isn't that the way humans were designed? We really need to stop denigrating stay at home mothers.

That's a serious job, dude. My best friend did that for a while and his wife went to work with 3 kids.
I went up and stayed with him a week while he was doing that. All day long from one to the other, constantly,
until she got home and there was dinner. And cleaning had to be done, too. Chickens fed, dogs, cats. All that.
Lunch, breakfast, dinner.

 

[Correll]

I do have contempt for people like this, yes:

WOW. Yes, Keep pouring it on. Thanks.