- Aug 4, 2009
- 281,974
- 145,446
- 2,615
You do not need to propel a projectile at a target at 500 rounds per minuteDerp!
Which of course has not a fucking thing to do with Paddock.
Thinking only guns are good weapons for mass murder is a bit shallow no?
In this case they are, dope.
And you can't see why using the argument that a particular thing is good for mass murder to support regulation is simplistic?
It's not simplistic. Your argument is. These are guns. Guns designed to kill.
Measures have been taken to mitigate the possibility of attacks in every other way. Cockpit doors are fortified and TSA screens passengers. Cities around the world are working to better protect large gatherings of pedestrians from vehicles. The glaring difference is of course that America has done nothing to address these attacks. Not one thing. In fact, people like you actively fight against it. So when you use arguments like, " ya but...trucks", it is not only simplistic but dumb.
European Cities Add Barriers to Thwart Vehicle Attacks
Guns are designed to propel a projectile at a target
Anything else that happens is the shooter's responsibility.
OK so how do you stop these type of attacks without trampling on the rights of people who own guns or want to own guns who will never commit such a crime?