Barking: Shooter at Las Vegas University

[Lord-Humungus]

Indeed.

Wouldn't it be awesome if we made it easy to get mental health treatment and hard to get a gun, rather than the other way around?

It would be even more awesome if you didn’t come up here with that lying bullshit. There are more restrictions on getting a firearms now than in previous times in our nations history when we did not have all these shootings.
Maybe if we started to focus on the people problem and didn’t allow criminals who use firearms to receive such light sentences instead of useless red tape we could see a change. Maybe if people took warning signs serious instead of dismissing them as eccentric or quirky behavior we would see a change. Maybe if our schools focused on how to be a better member of society instead of what the proper pronoun is for the made up genders we would see a change. Maybe if we stopped pumping people full of mind altering drugs pretending to be medication we wo see a change.

 

[LAUGHatLEFTISTS]

White Boomer.

Most likely a MAGA type.

Most likely a leftist professor who was brainwashed to be angry and hate America his entire life.

 

[Failzero]

Most likely a leftist professor who was brainwashed to be angry and hate America his entire life.

QFT : If he was a Right leaning individual
He would have owned more Than ONE Firearm ( Middle Tier at best 9mm HG )

 

[JoeB131]

It would be even more awesome if you didn’t come up here with that lying bullshit. There are more restrictions on getting a firearms now than in previous times in our nations history when we did not have all these shootings.

Actually, no, the gun laws have been loosened in the last 30 years. The Assault Weapons ban was allowed to expire, the McDonald and Heller decisions eliminated common sense gun laws enacted by states and cities.

Maybe if we started to focus on the people problem and didn’t allow criminals who use firearms to receive such light sentences instead of useless red tape we could see a change.

Guy, we lock up 2 million people in this country. Locking people up isn't an answer.

Maybe if people took warning signs serious instead of dismissing them as eccentric or quirky behavior we would see a change.

Okay... how does that stop the quirky relative from getting a gun if no one ever asks them?

Maybe if our schools focused on how to be a better member of society instead of what the proper pronoun is for the made up genders we would see a change.

Yes, that's it. It's about the pronouns!

Maybe if we stopped pumping people full of mind altering drugs pretending to be medication we wo see a change.

Somehow, I think this guy was a little old for Ritalin.

Some of these are valid points, but the fact it, it's just too easy for crazy people to get guns and it shouldn't be.

 

[Failzero]

Actually, no, the gun laws have been loosened in the last 30 years. The Assault Weapons ban was allowed to expire, the McDonald and Heller decisions eliminated common sense gun laws enacted by states and cities.


Guy, we lock up 2 million people in this country. Locking people up isn't an answer.


Okay... how does that stop the quirky relative from getting a gun if no one ever asks them?

Yes, that's it. It's about the pronouns!



Somehow, I think this guy was a little old for Ritalin.

Some of these are valid points, but the fact it, it's just too easy for crazy people to get guns and it shouldn't be.

So how bout a Drug Screening ( Piss test ) with EVERY Firearm Purchase ( 4473 ) that focuses on Illegal Drugs and SSRIs and if SSRIs are present then the Psychologist or Shrink / Dr. must be identified and be compelled to release Records that include history and any 51/50s or other holds or adjudications .

 

[g5000]

The guy was 67. Why would he want a job at that age. Most folks his age are retired.

Or in Congress.

 

[Lord-Humungus]

Actually, no, the gun laws have been loosened in the last 30 years. The Assault Weapons ban was allowed to expire, the McDonald and Heller decisions eliminated common sense gun laws enacted by states and cities.

Bullshit, in my state alone we have added mandatory background checks, limited purchases to one gun a month in the last 5 years and it has done zero to stop shootings. We have seen more mass shootings in the 5 years after has hose laws implemented than the 5 years prior

Guy, we lock up 2 million people in this country. Locking people up isn't an answer.

Sure it is the best way to make sure some who has used a gun to a commit a crime can’t do it again is to have them removed regardless free population

Okay... how does that stop the quirky relative from getting a gun if no one ever asks them?

If you have a concern rather than dismiss bring it to the authorities attention. It’s not that hard

Yes, that's it. It's about the pronouns!

More emphasis is placed on pronouns than being responsible respectful citizens.

Somehow, I think this guy was a little old for Ritalin.

If you think only young people are being overprescribed serious mind altering medication you are out of touch.

Some of these are valid points, but the fact it, it's just too easy for crazy people to get guns and it shouldn't be.

The problem with your approach is you are willing to deny the vast majority of people their right and turn it into a privilege in the hopes you may possibly kinda sorta if your lucky make a slight unmeasurably difference.

 

[JGalt]

So how bout a Drug Screening ( Piss test ) with EVERY Firearm Purchase ( 4473 ) that focuses on Illegal Drugs and SSRIs and if SSRIs are present then the Psychologist or Shrink / Dr. must be identified and be compelled to release Records that include history and any 51/50s or other holds or adjudications .

The fervent anti-gun left are all for stricter gun laws until they "infringe" on them getting their buzz on.

 

[JoeB131]

Bullshit, in my state alone we have added mandatory background checks, limited purchases to one gun a month in the last 5 years and it has done zero to stop shootings. We have seen more mass shootings in the 5 years after has hose laws implemented than the 5 years prior

who needs to buy more than one gun a month? I mean other than mass shooters. All of these laws are kind of minor and nowhere near what we need.

Sure it is the best way to make sure some who has used a gun to a commit a crime can’t do it again is to have them removed regardless free population

Except we lock up 2 million people. Many of them return to crime because a criminal record prevents them from getting honest work. The prison-industrial complex actually creates more crime than it prevents.

More emphasis is placed on pronouns than being responsible respectful citizens.

Maybe we need to do social credits like China.

If you think only young people are being overprescribed serious mind altering medication you are out of touch.

It seems like you need to take yours.

The problem with your approach is you are willing to deny the vast majority of people their right and turn it into a privilege in the hopes you may possibly kinda sorta if your lucky make a slight unmeasurably difference.

It shouldn't be a "Right". The Second Amendment was about militias, not the ability of crazy people to get military grade weapons and inflict havoc.

The problem with the Second Amendment is that it was written at a time when guns were slow to reload and only effective when fired in volleys. You wouldn't have had a school shooting in 1776 because after Ye Olde Adam Lanza fired off his first shot, it would take him a minute to reload his musket, and all the little buggers would have ran away. Oh, yeah, and Adam would have been locked in a loony bin here he belonged with the other Bedlamites.

 

[Lord-Humungus]

who needs to buy more than one gun a month? I mean other than mass shooters. All of these laws are kind of minor and nowhere near what we need.


Except we lock up 2 million people. Many of them return to crime because a criminal record prevents them from getting honest work. The prison-industrial complex actually creates more crime than it prevents.


Maybe we need to do social credits like China.

It seems like you need to take yours.

It shouldn't be a "Right". The Second Amendment was about militias, not the ability of crazy people to get military grade weapons and inflict havoc.

The problem with the Second Amendment is that it was written at a time when guns were slow to reload and only effective when fired in volleys. You wouldn't have had a school shooting in 1776 because after Ye Olde Adam Lanza fired off his first shot, it would take him a minute to reload his musket, and all the little buggers would have ran away. Oh, yeah, and Adam would have been locked in a loony bin here he belonged with the other Bedlamites.

There is not a single thing you got correct in all those words.

 

[JoeB131]

There is not a single thing you got correct in all those words.

Your concession is duly noted. I'm not sure why you volunteer for the bitch-slapping, but you do.

Hey, NO OTHER COUNTRY HAS THE CRIME PROBLEMS WE HAVE. For the United Kingdom, a mass shooting is something that happens once a decade, the US it's something that happens twice a day!

 

[beautress]

Does anyone actually pay attention to those "no weapons" signs on the doors?

Why didn't anyone shoot back?

Oh.
Wait.
Gun-free zone.

Per NRS 202.265, the following are prohibited on university property:

• Projectile weapons
• Bladed weapons greater than three inches in length

Nothing to see here, move along.

"Gun-free zone." Interesting that when you ban guns, the only people who have them are criminal murderers and wanabe criminal murderers.

The Constitution is right when it comes to "Amendment 2."

Time to feed the dogs and get busy on my projects. So sorry people were killed because some idiot wanted to die by cop and was wanting to guarantee his instant death. My heart goes out to the families, friends and loved ones of the deceased.

 

[22lcidw]

Actually, no, the gun laws have been loosened in the last 30 years. The Assault Weapons ban was allowed to expire, the McDonald and Heller decisions eliminated common sense gun laws enacted by states and cities.


Guy, we lock up 2 million people in this country. Locking people up isn't an answer.


Okay... how does that stop the quirky relative from getting a gun if no one ever asks them?

Yes, that's it. It's about the pronouns!



Somehow, I think this guy was a little old for Ritalin.

Some of these are valid points, but the fact it, it's just too easy for crazy people to get guns and it shouldn't be.

Taking out aggressions against other peasants is not the answer. However, it may be all someone who was screwed with can do. We all know who the authoritarians are. Who the famous are. Just saying. If you are going out of this world, go with gusto.

 

[2aguy]

who needs to buy more than one gun a month? I mean other than mass shooters. All of these laws are kind of minor and nowhere near what we need.


Except we lock up 2 million people. Many of them return to crime because a criminal record prevents them from getting honest work. The prison-industrial complex actually creates more crime than it prevents.


Maybe we need to do social credits like China.

It seems like you need to take yours.

It shouldn't be a "Right". The Second Amendment was about militias, not the ability of crazy people to get military grade weapons and inflict havoc.

The problem with the Second Amendment is that it was written at a time when guns were slow to reload and only effective when fired in volleys. You wouldn't have had a school shooting in 1776 because after Ye Olde Adam Lanza fired off his first shot, it would take him a minute to reload his musket, and all the little buggers would have ran away. Oh, yeah, and Adam would have been locked in a loony bin here he belonged with the other Bedlamites.

And thank you for confirming that you are exactly the fascist we always knew you were....

The social credit system of China? You really, truly are a stupid human being.

 

[2aguy]

Your concession is duly noted. I'm not sure why you volunteer for the bitch-slapping, but you do.

Hey, NO OTHER COUNTRY HAS THE CRIME PROBLEMS WE HAVE. For the United Kingdom, a mass shooting is something that happens once a decade, the US it's something that happens twice a day!

Yes...they do......they are seeing increasing crime the way the U.S. saw increasing crime by the 1960s.....Europe had to deal with the complete destruction of their countries after World War 2, but they are now catching up to the violence and gun crime we saw mid 1960s......as I have posted about in Belgium, Sweden, France, the Netherlands, Britain....

Their 3rd world, immigrant drug gangs are using guns and hand grenades more and more to control their drug turf....just as happened in the U.S. coming out of the 1960s.

 

[2aguy]

Your concession is duly noted. I'm not sure why you volunteer for the bitch-slapping, but you do.

Hey, NO OTHER COUNTRY HAS THE CRIME PROBLEMS WE HAVE. For the United Kingdom, a mass shooting is something that happens once a decade, the US it's something that happens twice a day!

The governments of those other countries have murdered more of their own citizens in a shorter period of time than all of our gun murders in our entire 247 year history....

Europe....not combat casualties.....people rounded up and murdered by the German socialists across Europe....

15-20 million people in 6 years.

Gun murder in the U.S. over our entire 247 year history?

Around 2,470,000

You have no standing by parading out those mass murdering governments.......we have codified the 2nd Amendment because of exactly that kind of heinous behavior by governments...

 

[JoeB131]

And thank you for confirming that you are exactly the fascist we always knew you were....

The social credit system of China? You really, truly are a stupid human being.

wow, the sarcasm went right over your head, didn't it, DickTiny2.

Gun murder in the U.S. over our entire 247 year history?

Around 2,470,000

Not really. We completely genocided Native Americans to the point they are a crushed people.

Genocide is in the eye of the beholder.

Guns didn't protect the Indians, they didn't protect the Jews.

 

[JoeB131]

Yes...they do......they are seeing increasing crime the way the U.S. saw increasing crime by the 1960s.....Europe had to deal with the complete destruction of their countries after World War 2, but they are now catching up to the violence and gun crime we saw mid 1960s......as I have posted about in Belgium, Sweden, France, the Netherlands, Britain....

You keep saying that, but it's not true.

WE have 20,000 gun murders a year.

They have murders in the low triple digits.

 

[2aguy]

wow, the sarcasm went right over your head, didn't it, DickTiny2.


Not really. We completely genocided Native Americans to the point they are a crushed people.

Genocide is in the eye of the beholder.

Guns didn't protect the Indians, they didn't protect the Jews.

The majority of Native Americans died long before our country was created. They didn't die from genocide but from a lack of immunity to diseases the Europeand brought with them.

The indians didn't have guns, or the wheel, or the ability to read or write.......ships, or many of the other things Europeans brought over with them.

 

[2aguy]

You keep saying that, but it's not true.

WE have 20,000 gun murders a year.

They have murders in the low triple digits.

Nope, we used to average about 10,000 gun murders a year, with criminals murdering other crimnals.

Then, the democrat party needed to beat Trump, so they used the Gentle giant myth to attack the police to the point they can't, or won't do their jobs, so criminals started to carry guns without fear, and started murdering each other in greater numbers in democrat party controlled cities...where they are also released by democrat party judges and prosecutors.


gun murder in the U.S. over our entire 247 year history is about 2,470,000......

Governments of Europe murdering their own, gun free people in just 6 years.....15-20 million.

How many hundreds of years will it take us to catch up to the murder number of Europe?