Judge Reinhart, Who Approved Trump Warrant, Recused Himself From Another Trump Case Just Two Months Ago

Jim H - VA USA

Plutonium Member
Gold Supporting Member
Sep 19, 2020
7,039
8,160
2,138
Just two months ago, Bruce E. Reinhart recused himself from Trump's lawsuit against Hillary.

It has been previously disclosed that Judge Reinhart was an Obama donor and also made posts critical of Trump on social media.

If he could not be impartial when overseeing a Trump legal proceeding then, how could he possibly be impartial now for a case involving the former president for which he knew the result was expected to cause serious damage to former President Trump?

It seems that Trump's lawyers might be able to argue that the entire search was unreasonable as a result.

“The undersigned Magistrate Judge, to whom the above-styled cause has been assigned, hereby recuses himself and refers the case to the Clerk of Court for reassignment pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 455.”

The statute that the judge cited says, in part, that a judge “… shall disqualify himself in any proceeding in which his impartiality might reasonably be questioned …” The statute continues by describing such concerns, including “a personal bias or prejudice concerning a party, or personal knowledge of disputed evidentiary facts.”

Link to the recusal:

1660407514893.png

1660407536779.png



 
Last edited:
Just two months ago, Bruce E. Reinhart recused himself from Trump's lawsuit against Hillary.

It has been previously disclosed that Judge Reinhart was an Obama donor and also made posts critical of Trump on social media.

If he could not be impartial when overseeing a Trump legal proceeding then, how could he possibly be impartial now for a case involving the former president for which he knew the result was expected to cause serious damage to former President Trump?

It seems that Trump's lawyers might be able to argue that the entire search was unreasonable as a result.

“The undersigned Magistrate Judge, to whom the above-styled cause has been assigned, hereby recuses himself and refers the case to the Clerk of Court for reassignment pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 455.”

The statute that the judge cited says, in part, that a judge “… shall disqualify himself in any proceeding in which his impartiality might reasonably be questioned …” The statute continues by describing such concerns, including “a personal bias or prejudice concerning a party, or personal knowledge of disputed evidentiary facts.”

Link to the recusal:



This shows the Judge recognized his inability to be impartial in regards to Trump 2 months earlier ... so what happened during those 2 months?

It sounds like the judge had his mind changed for him...

As the keeper of Epstein's little black book, it makes me wonder if the FBI / Wray did not coerce the former Epstein attorney to change his mind in the case of the raid.

If what I read was correct - that the judge was adamant after the raid that the detas of the search warrant be released - it doesn't sound like he was 100% on-board with the raid.

I could be mistaken...
 
Just two months ago, Bruce E. Reinhart recused himself from Trump's lawsuit against Hillary.

It has been previously disclosed that Judge Reinhart was an Obama donor and also made posts critical of Trump on social media.

If he could not be impartial when overseeing a Trump legal proceeding then, how could he possibly be impartial now for a case involving the former president for which he knew the result was expected to cause serious damage to former President Trump?

It seems that Trump's lawyers might be able to argue that the entire search was unreasonable as a result.

“The undersigned Magistrate Judge, to whom the above-styled cause has been assigned, hereby recuses himself and refers the case to the Clerk of Court for reassignment pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 455.”

The statute that the judge cited says, in part, that a judge “… shall disqualify himself in any proceeding in which his impartiality might reasonably be questioned …” The statute continues by describing such concerns, including “a personal bias or prejudice concerning a party, or personal knowledge of disputed evidentiary facts.”

Link to the recusal:

View attachment 681887
View attachment 681889



What happened here is quite obvious. He recused himself to protect HRC but was more than willing to sign up in an attempt to attack and destroy Trump. This so called fair minded judge is nothing more that a leftist controlled pollical hack.
 
He recused himself to protect HRC but was more than willing to sign up in an attempt to attack and destroy Trump.
How does that make sense? If he were to protect Hillary, he would have stayed on and corruptly protected Hillary. You just think everyone is as corrupt as the orange pile of shit. That's your error.
 
How does that make sense? If he were to protect Hillary, he would have stayed on and corruptly protected Hillary. You just think everyone is as corrupt as the orange pile of shit. That's your error.
I see it differently. He could not have protected HRC without showing his true colors by ruling against Trump and for HRC at every turn. He therefore removed himself because of his own TDS. Hopeful that another judge with less baggage could without being so obvious, protect the bitch.
 

Forum List

Back
Top