Why Would Trump Hold Onto Anything From His Presidency That Would Give ANYONE Grounds to Invade His Private Space With a Search Warrant?

I refuted plenty, and I don't think smokey needs your help in showing deceit. You leftists are disgusting liars, and brainwashed fools that lack self-awareness and common sense.
Going on SEVEN FUCKING YEARS of get Trump is not a good look on you subverted demoralized zombies.
:rolleyes:
It took them longer to get Al Capone...
If you break the law they go after you, Trump has clearly been wreakless legally... He just met far better and deeper pockets in the DOJ than what a construction contractor can come up with..
 
  • Thanks
Reactions: xyz
It took them longer to get Al Capone...
If you break the law they go after you, Trump has clearly been wreakless legally... He just met far better and deeper pockets in the DOJ than what a construction contractor can come up with..
AGAIN, you fucking demented avenger subverted demoralized zombies put this country through THREE YEARS OF Russia Russia Russia LIES all stemming from Hillary's BOUGHT AND PAID FOR dirty dossier from a fucking RUSSIAN!!!!!!
The irony of it all is off the charts, but you zombies have no sense of self-awareness, NONE!!!!!!
:fu:
 
You demented zombies always cite that toothless Senate report that doesn't mean ANYTHING toward finding Trump guilty of committing any crime! Just more hints and allegations from The Swamp! :eusa_hand:
:rolleyes:
That was the report that which put highlighted the issues that convicted Paul Manafort, Rodger Stone, Micheal Flynn,...


Trump then pardoned these people so they would keep there silence... A number of people from the Trump Campaign went to jail for lying to FBI over Russian Connections... They were willing to lie to the FBI and goto jail than tell the truth...
 
  • Thanks
Reactions: xyz
Bro, if you give Biden an IQ test, he doesnt score anything above 70 on it. Without a doubt, Biden is the dumbest, most inneffective president the world has ever known. Im not talking about just in the US either. No president in history anywhere has been as dumb as Biden. Who else tries shaking hands with ghosts non stop?
A lot of Trump supporters can't really judge intelligence as they don't understand the consequences of government decisions...

Here is an example...
The present Oil prices is being set by supply issues.
Back in early 2020 US Oil Companies were going out of business because the lack of demand for Oil and low prices...
Trump pushed OPEC to cut supply (actually threatened) at the same time US production was dropping too. This all happening 6 months before Biden comes to power

So when Biden came in the Oil Supply was 12% below pre COVID with demand back to normal that summer.
US production was low and couldn't ramp up due to companies bust and lack of parts.

This all happened under Trump and Biden is cleaning up his mess.




1663159177789.png
 
AGAIN, you fucking demented avenger subverted demoralized zombies put this country through THREE YEARS OF Russia Russia Russia LIES all stemming from Hillary's BOUGHT AND PAID FOR dirty dossier from a fucking RUSSIAN!!!!!!
The irony of it all is off the charts, but you zombies have no sense of self-awareness, NONE!!!!!!
:fu:
It didn't start with the dossier...

GEORGE PAPADOPOULOS comments in a party to an ally diplomat did...​


You refused to read the evidence and just call people names and shot 'Hoax'...

We have presented the proof but you at demented when we do... You are struggling with the idea that you could be so wrong about someone..
 
Yes, presidents and vice presidents are explicitly exempt from any and all classified document legislation.

{...
The President has no security clearance, in the sense that other employees of the federal government do. Simply put, there is no document held by the United States government that the President is restricted from viewing for reasons of national security. It’s also impossible for the President to violate a security classification; the President has the absolute authority to decide who is and is not entitled to know what is in a classified document, and may reveal any classified fact he or she deems appropriate to any person at any time for any reason (except possibly for a few narrow cases where specific statutes make such releases illegal).
...}

In this case, what the FBI did by breaking into Mar-a-lago was completely illegal.
Trump is a private citizen, ot the President, maybe a cult leader but no the President.
 
What a deflection! The rogue anti-Trump FBI agents developed what THEY called an “insurance plan” to oust a duly-elected president. Now the weaponized anti-Trump FBI is working again to suppress the voice of half of all voters.
Somebody was working overtime in QAon this week... Must be great to live in a fact free world...

The original Bullshit Mountain...
 
The ‘police’ discredited themselves. The MSM have been spreading lies for decades yet sheep like you refuse to access other sources.
So you are anti police then...

I presume you want no restrictions to access guns too...

So a guy who want high powered guns and hates the police... What could go wrong?
 
So you are anti police then...

I presume you want no restrictions to access guns too...

So a guy who want high powered guns and hates the police... What could go wrong?
I never said that, you are projecting. A guy who hates police is a criminal. A criminal will get illegal firearms anyway.
 
BBC kind of likes fact and the truth...
Might not be as rating inducing as pandering to your audience but gives far more informed viewers..
You do realize that the BBC is owned by the British government?

“It might take our producers five minutes to find 60 economists who feared Brexit and five hours to find a sole voice who espoused it… But by the time we went on air we simply had one of each; we presented this unequal effort to our audience as balance. It wasn’t.”


"This is revealing because it suggests that neutrality doesn’t mean presenting both sides of the argument, but rather reflecting the balance of opinion within some section or other of the cultural establishment. The problem with that is it turns the BBC into an echo chamber for other echo chambers — the liberal elites reverberating to one another’s opinions for evermore. This isn’t objectivity, it is hardwired confirmation bias, and a gift to the populists that Maitlis railed against in her lecture. "
 
Maybe I'm just being naive but why give people LEGAL grounds to come after you?

That's like leaving a job, especially if involuntarily and deciding to keep one of the cell phones that you've been using for both work and personal calls and then refusing or not wanting to turn it over when asked for it. I understand that having your own personal items mixed in with your work items presents a dilemma but you don't deal with it by lying about what you're holding and then not turning over everything that is asked for.

Unless I'm missing something, does Trump or anyone else believe he's entitled to keep classified, top secret documents at his home? Why would he not turn these items over? Just general principle?

Former President Trump is asking a federal court to appoint a special master to review the documents the FBI seized from Mar-a-Lago this month during a court-authorized search.​
In a motion filed in federal court in Florida, Trump also is seeking to prevent the government from further reviewing the documents that were taken until a special master is appointed, and he wants the government to provide more details on items that were taken during the search.​
The legal action is the first from Trump's attorneys since FBI agents executed a search warrant at Mar-a-Lago two weeks ago.​
"Law enforcement is a shield that protects Americans. It cannot be used as a weapon for political purposes," the filing says. "Therefore, we seek judicial assistance in the aftermath of an unprecedented and unnecessary raid on President Trump's home at Mar-a-Lago."​
Trump's attorneys argue that the search raises Fourth Amendment concerns and that the warrant used was overly broad. They also say the department took the unprecedented step of searching the former president's home despite what Trump's attorneys say was his voluntary assistance with investigators over several months.​
In a statement, Justice Department spokesman Anthony Coley reiterated that the search warrant at Mar-a-Lago was "authorized by a federal court upon the required finding of probable cause."​
The department is aware of Trump's motion, he said, and will file its response in court.​
Last Friday, the judge in the case, U.S. Magistrate Judge Bruce Reinhart, gave the Justice Department one week to provide a redacted copy of the affidavit used to justify the unprecedented search of Trump's residence. Multiple media organizations had asked the judge to unseal all documents related to the search, notably the affidavit laying out the reasoning and research. At a hearing last Thursday, the organizations said they do not want to release any information that would have a chilling effect on current or future witnesses, endanger people involved in the probe or compromise the investigation.​
Read the full warrant documents from FBI search of Trump's Mar-a-Lago home's Mar-a-Lago home

The Justice Department argued at the hearing that redacting the affidavit would leave no information of substance to release and also noted that the search itself and release of the warrant last week had created a volatile situation where FBI agents have already received death threats.​
The Justice Department must give Reinhart their proposed redacted version by Thursday at noon. The judge has not said what, if anything, he will ultimately order made public.​


While the Justice Department asked the court to unseal the warrant, citing intense public interest, it has argued strongly against releasing the affidavit, saying doing so could compromise its investigation, other probes, the possibility of future witness cooperation and the safety of agents and individuals named in the affidavit.​
The warrant shows that FBI agents retrieved documents labeled classified, secret, top secret and confidential as well potential presidential records. It also reveals that the Justice Department is investigating the potential violation of three federal statutes, including the Espionage Act and obstruction of justice.​
The genesis of the investigation comes from an unlikely source: the National Archives. This winter the agency, in charge of cataloguing and storing important government documents, retrieved 15 boxes of key presidential records that it said Trump was improperly and possibly illegally keeping at home.​


Good questions. Wonder why Trump took the documents?
 
Good questions. Wonder why Trump took the documents?
Yo get more insight into Trump, ask some other politicians who did the same ... and worse:

Sandy 'Burgaler' Berger
Obama
Hillary
 
Yo get more insight into Trump, ask some other politicians who did the same ... and worse:

Sandy 'Burgaler' Berger
Obama
Hillary

That's more Trump lies. You guys may win and take us into an autocratic, nationalistic theocracy. In time you won't like it.

 
Good questions. Wonder why Trump took the documents?
Possibly as evidence of how the DOJ and FBI illegally spied on him and his administration.

I don’t necessarily believe any list of documents the FBI or DOJ comes up with. I have no confidence in either organization at this time. Both at rotten at the top if not all the way through.
 
Possibly as evidence of how the DOJ and FBI illegally spied on him and his administration.

I don’t necessarily believe any list of documents the FBI or DOJ comes up with. I have no confidence in either organization at this time. Both at rotten at the top if not all the way through.

The US monitors communication in and out of Russian embassies world wide and have for more than 50 years. If you called the Russian embassy constantly, they would monitor you. It's SOP.
 

Forum List

Back
Top