Judge issues ruling on unsealing FBI Trump raid warrant

[Leo123]

It gives you the right to possess the firearms they use to shoot people. Without that right, they would have to shout harsh language

No, without that right, only criminals would be armed and YOU would have to use 'harsh language.'

 

[struth]

What part of didn't say anything or file any motions mean do you?

Why do you keep lying that Bobb did something in court, other than watch the proceedings.

e

they didn’t have to file a second motion when one was already filed. Not say a thing. They were there jointing the one filed and before the court. Trump has repeatedly made clear his suooort for being fully released. it was your stalinist admin fighting against it

 

[JimH52]

Trump "tweeted" it. But didn't have his lawyers file a motion requesting it.

DUH !!!!

trump....like everything he does...speaks from different sides of his mouth.

 

[BackAgain]

From your own article here:

"They include “a personal bias or prejudice concerning a party, or personal knowledge of disputed evidentiary facts” or prior work as a lawyer for a party involved in the case"

So we really have no idea why Rhinehardt recused himself from that 2016 case do we?
No we don't.
Therefore we don't know that he now lacks the impartialty to act in the Trump espionage matter, do we.
No we don't.

Also from your article:

I generally ignore the President-elect’s tweets, but not this one. John Lewis arguably has done more to “make America great” than any living citizen. Last August, I took my son to the Edmund Pettus Bridge in Selma so he could understand the kind of courage and sacrifice required to live in a democratic society. John Lewis embodies that spirit. Although I’ve never met him, he is one of my heroes.

Thank you, Robert Reich, for saying what many of us feel, “John Lewis is the conscience of America. Donald Trump doesn’t have the moral stature to kiss John Lewis’s feet.”

Or, as Joseph Welch said to Joseph McCarthy, “At long last, have you left no sense of decency?”

Now the author of this "Red State" (lol!) article accused Rhinehardt of "bashing" Trump in this old Tweet.
No he didn't.
Trump made a supreme ass of himself in regard to John Lewis and this guy simply called Trump out on it.

All in all this is NOT an unbiased article you are using.

Wtf are you babbling about?
1. Reinhardt previously recused himself in a case involving Trump.
2. He also previously tweeted negative opinions about Trump. That’s not opinion. It’s what he wrote.
3. He damn well should recuse himself on account of that bias.

BUT, now, on probably the most important legal decision of his less than significant career, he doesn’t.

Do the math. It’s not hard. 1+1=2 to this very day.

 

[meaner gene]

TITLE III. PLEADINGS AND MOTIONS

www.law.cornell.edu

Motions and Other Papers.

(1) In General. A request for a court order must be made by motion. The motion must:

(A) be in writing unless made during a hearing or trial;

Signature. Every pleading, written motion, and other paper must be signed by at least one attorney of record in the attorney's name—or by a party personally if the party is unrepresented.

https://www.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/rules-of-civil-procedure.pdf

 

[meaner gene]

Wtf are you babbling about?
1. Reinhardt previously recused himself in a case involving Trump.

Actually he recused himself in a case involving Trump and Clinton.

We don't know which party he had a prejudice for or against.

 

[meaner gene]

https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.flsd.617854/gov.uscourts.flsd.617854.22.0_5.pdf

Case No.: 9:22-mj-08332-BER

MOTION OF THE WASHINGTON POST, CNN, NBC NEWS, AND SCRIPPS
TO INTERVENE, FOR ACCESS TO ALL SEARCH WARRANT RECORDS,
AND IN SUPPORT OF THE UNITED STATES’ PARTIAL MOTION TO UNSEAL

 

[meaner gene]

Docket for United States v. Sealed Search Warrant, 9:22-mj-08332 - CourtListener.com

Docket for United States v. Sealed Search Warrant, 9:22-mj-08332 — Brought to you by the RECAP Initiative and Free Law Project, a non-profit dedicated to creating high quality open legal information.

www.courtlistener.com

PAPERLESS ORDER taking under advisement 18 Motion as to Sealed Search Warrant (1). The United States shall immediately serve a copy of its Motion on counsel for former President Trump. On or before 3:00 p.m. Eastern time on August 12, 2022, the United States shall file a certificate of conferral advising whether former President Trump opposes the Government's motion to unseal. Signed by Magistrate Judge Bruce E. Reinhart (BER) (Entered: 08/11/2022)

 

[MagicMike]

Wtf are you babbling about?
1. Reinhardt previously recused himself in a case involving Trump.
2. He also previously tweeted negative opinions about Trump. That’s not opinion. It’s what he wrote.
3. He damn well should recuse himself on account of that bias.

BUT, now, on probably the most important legal decision of his less than significant career, he doesn’t.

Do the math. It’s not hard. 1+1=2 to this very day.

You missed the point entirely you twit!
So what if he recused himself once in the past.
We don't know why.
And this is a DIFFERENT case. The specifics are different so he doesn't feel a need to recuse this time.
So what?
Quit yer WHINING about it snowflake!

Boo! Hoo!
So he tweeted that Trump was an asshole concerning John Lewis.
Well He (Trump) WAS an asshole about Lewis!
It needed to be said....and it was spot on accurate.
You can't fault the guy fir that.

 

[BackAgain]

You missed the point entirely you twit!
So what if he recused himself once in the past.
We don't know why.
And this is a DIFFERENT case. The specifics are different so he doesn't feel a need to recuse this time.
So what?
Quit yer WHINING about it snowflake!

Boo! Hoo!
So he tweeted that Trump was an asshole concerning John Lewis.
Well He (Trump) WAS an asshole about Lewis!
It needed to be said....and it was spot on accurate.
You can't fault the guy fir that.

No, you ultimate imbecile. You have made it your life’s mission to miss the point.

The only valid point, dopey, is that the magistrate judge recused himself because he should have. He didn’t have to say why or how he was biased. We all already know that. We can read what he said about Trump. And once he acknowledged such a bias, he should have stuck with that especially on a matter as historically important as this one.

 

[Esdraelon]

The DOJ will just threaten the Judge and nothing will be released

Not only that, if Trump hesitates to release that CC footage for too long, the FBI will get an injunction against it and effectively criminalize its release.

 

[beagle9]

BREAKING: Judge Issues Ruling On Unsealing Affidavit For FBI Search Of Mar-A-Lago

Stunning decision.

conservativebrief.com

US Magistrate Judge Bruce Reinhart says he will unseal some of the procedural filings currently under seal on the search warrant docket.

The “public has a ‘clear and powerful’ interest in understanding the unprecedented investigation in former President Donald J. Trump’s handling of classified records,” the media organizations including CNN, the New York Times, and the Washington Post said.

The Department of Justice argued that the affidavit should stay sealed.

“If disclosed, the affidavit would serve as a roadmap to the government’s ongoing investigation, providing specific details about its direction and likely course, in a manner that is highly likely to compromise future investigative steps,” it said.

But the former president has called for it to be shown to everyone.

“In the interest of TRANSPARENCY, I call for the immediate release of the completely Unredacted Affidavit pertaining to this horrible and shocking BREAK-IN,” he said. “Also, the Judge on this case should recuse!”

The judge faced criticism and even threats after it was discovered that he had recused himself from a lawsuit involving Trump and former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton.

Last week, one of the personal attorneys for former President Donald Trump demanded to know why the judge who signed the warrant to search his private house had recused himself from a lawsuit against 2016 Democrat Presidential Nominee Hillary Clinton.

The attorney, Alina Habba, said that this judge recused himself from the former president’s lawsuit against Clinton this year when she spoke to Fox News host Jesse Watters on Friday, The Daily Mail reported.

The whole thing was an attempt to cast indecision on the 2022 election's, otherwise trying to counter the bumps based upon Trump's endorsements, and based upon Trump's support for the conservative party therefore leading up to the 2024 election's. They (back then) figured they could pull the crap in 2016 by casting doubt with their games, and that is exactly what this was about as well.

Heck, it hasn't worked, and now proven by Cheney's own words after her landslide loss, where as she said that she would work to make sure that Donald Trump doesn't run in 2024 (think about it folks, she spilled the beans), otherwise it is direct proof of what the J6 hearings have been about this whole time, and it's epic telling about what Cheney has been about this entire time also.

It's political vengeance, and the American people have been dragged through the mud by it all to long.

MAGA.

 

[MagicMike]

Not only that, if Trump hesitates to release that CC footage for too long, the FBI will get an injunction against it and effectively criminalize its release.

There is nothing on the tape but a bunch of hard working F.B.I. agents.

 

[meaner gene]

The only valid point, dopey, is that the magistrate judge recused himself because he should have. He didn’t have to say why or how he was biased. We all already know that. We can read what he said about Trump.

A judge has to recuse himself if he has a relationship with any of the parties in the lawsuit.

That would include Donald J. Trump and (hold onto your hats ladies and gentlemen)

Hillary R. Clinton
Democratic National Committee
HFACC, Inc.
DNC Services Corporation
Perkins Coie, LLC
Michael Sussman
Marc Elias
Debbie Wasserman Schultz
Charles Halliday Dolan Jr.
Jake Sullivan
John Podesta
Robert E. Mook
Phillipe Reines
Fusion GPS
Glenn Simpson
Peter Fritsch
Nellie Ohr
Bruce Ohr
Orbis Business Intelligence, Ltd.
Christopher Steele
Igor Danchenko
Neustar, Inc.
Rodney Joffe
ABC Corporations
Adam Schiff
Rod Rosenstein
Neustar Security Services

Judge Reinhardt could have recused over any of those parties.

 

[Esdraelon]

There is nothing on the tape but a bunch of hard working F.B.I. agents.

What is your source for that? "Hard working" can apply to serial killers as well, ya know? If these men and women performed their duties according to law and proper procedures, what difference would showing them make? These were not special or secret agents in the FBI. There is no reason they should expect secrecy but I see no reason why the tape should not be made public but with faces blurred. The information is more from the WAY they conducted the raid, not WHO did what.

 

[Billy_Bob]

i’m discussing what you said about how you feared people exercising the rights and quoting jefferson..do you not recall making that post?

Back then they were threatening and intimidating judges they didn't like... It was Differenet..

 

[bravoactual]

Thats the way I read it... Ongoing and Trump's attorneys have demanded the judge's recusal. This is about to get very ugly.

Names of the witnesses will not be revealed, which is what the Cons are after. Parts of the affidavit which do not contain those name will be released. But classified information will be held back.

 

[Billy_Bob]

Names of the witnesses will not be revealed, which is what the Cons are after. Parts of the affidavit which do not contain those name will be released. But classified information will be held back.

If we get more than a page with a header and then totally blacked out, I will be surprised. The DOJ is sweating bullets that this doesn't come out now. With this activist judge it will not become public.

 

[BackAgain]

There is nothing on the tape but a bunch of hard working F.B.I. agents.

Maybe. Let’s see the tapes. Then maybe we will congratulate you on your guesswork. But for now, that’s all it is. Guesswork.

 

[BackAgain]

Not only that, if Trump hesitates to release that CC footage for too long, the FBI will get an injunction against it and effectively criminalize its release.

A prior restraint on the free press? That sounds like our current AG.