Orangecat
Diamond Member
- Jun 22, 2020
- 16,639
- 18,413
- 2,288
Informed people call that "prison".I live in a gated community.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Informed people call that "prison".I live in a gated community.
^^^ That's what you post when you're proven to be a liar.Gobble Gobble Biden Boy!
Pelosi did no such thing.Failed to act? He asked for more Capitol police to prevent violence, Pelosi and the Dems in charge of them denied it.
He asked everyone to stay peaceful, most did.
The riot was led by FBI and Antifa plants. They would be the ones being charged.
Who started the Big Lie if not Trump? Which he started even before the election in case he lost. Just like he did in 2016.Trump created the stolen election lie.......WRONG. I understand why you're confused, it's because you don't have an independent bone in your body. Trump is no reason to believe the election was stolen, but the facts and common sense say it was.
He refused to deploy the National Guard.........They had already been deployed, he didn't refuse dick.
He refused to speak out against the violence........Oh look, rightwing ran out of material already. Still talking though, very emotional.
He refused to call back his mob........Same
Prove "Dems" screamed "NO"...LOL he offered National Guard and Dems always screamed “NO”.
Link to someone saying no. In fact there was never a formal offer.
Holy fuck, are you ever retarded. You just refuted your own bullshit in the very first sentence of the article YOU posted.The Capitol Police chief requested it 6 times, and was denied each time. It’s up to the House Sargent at Arms, he said no. They have all resigned in disgrace since then. They took it for the team (Pelosi).
Ex-Capitol Police Chief Says Requests For National Guard Denied 6 Times In Riots
Steven Sund contradicts reports that help was not requested, saying security officials at the House and Senate rebuffed calls for assistance ahead of and during the attack on the Capitol.www.npr.org
LOL he offered National Guard and Dems always screamed “NO”.
See post 387.Prove "Dems" screamed "NO"...
Yes moron, the House Sargent at Arms answers to Pelosi, not the White House. Nice try.Holy fuck, are you ever retarded. You just refuted your own bullshit in the very first sentence of the article YOU posted.
The former chief of U.S. Capitol Police says security officials at the House and Senate rebuffed his early requests to call in the National Guard ahead of a demonstration in support of President Trump that turned into a deadly attack on Congress.
Those security officials would be the House Sergeant of Arms, a Democrat at that time; and the Senate Sergeant of Arms, a Republican at that time. So it's not "Dems" as you falsely claimed and it wasn't Pelosi, as you falsely claimed.
LOLOLSee post 387.
So? Nothing you posted indicates she was involved in the decision. And you're ignoring the Senate Sergeant of Arms in the Senate was a Republican. That was Pelosi's fault to, huh?Yes moron, the House Sargent at Arms answers to Pelosi, not the White House. Nice try.
Riiight, so because MSM won’t blame Pelosi, then it couldn’t had been her fault at all.So? Nothing you posted indicates she was involved in the decision. And you're ignoring the Senate Sergeant of Arms in the Senate was a Republican. That was Pelosi's fault to, huh?
Who needs the MSM? There's plenty of rightwing news. Shirley, at least one of them has evidence she was involved?Riiight, so because MSM won’t blame Pelosi, then it couldn’t had been her fault at all.
Pelosi in not is charge of Capitol security. How can you blame Pelosi for what the MAGAMOB did? She certainly didn't have the power to call out the NG or tell the MAGMOB to stop.Riiight, so because MSM won’t blame Pelosi, then it couldn’t had been her fault at all.
I already said those police chiefs fell on their sword for Pelosi.Who needs the MSM? There's plenty of rightwing news. Shirley, at least one of them has evidence she was involved?
Not to mention, Blanton, the Architect of the Capitol. He was part of the decision making. He was appointed by Trump and certainly he would have thrown Pelosi under the bus had she been involved in that decision. And then there's Sund, the former Chief of the US Capitol Police. Pelosi ripped him apart after the Rightard Revolution and demanded his resignation, which came not long after. Surely would have taken Pelosi down with him had she been involved.
So?
Whatcha got?
No one care what you say. It's what you can prove that matters and all you're proving is that you're nuts as you possess zero evidence to prove that claim.I already said those police chiefs fell on their sword for Pelosi.
Party above all.
I have a theory about Trump's inaction. It's all because of the failure to overturn the election by way of dozens of fake electors on the Republican side;Trump is being sued for his actions on Jan 6. The Judge asks why Trump failed to act
Trump's potential liability for Capitol riot faces major test in court
A federal judge in Washington, DC, questioned former President Donald Trump's actions during his speech on January 6, 2021, as he considers for the first time whether Trump is immune from liability related to his supporters attacking the US Capitol.www.cnn.com
What do I do about the fact the President didn't denounce the conduct immediately ... and sent a tweet that arguably exacerbated things?" the judge asked. "Isn't that, from a plausibility standpoint, that the President plausibly agreed with the conduct of the people inside the Capitol that day?"
Because Trump appointees came from a cesspool known as DC.No one care what you say. It's what you can prove that matters and all you're proving is that you're nuts as you possess zero evidence to prove that claim.
For example ... why on Earth would a Trump appointee not do what Trump wanted and then fall on his sword for Pelosi?