Joe Biden's son will go to trial for federal gun crimes in June

[marvin martian]

As I predicted, attorneys for Joe Biden's son tried to use the Second Amendment to argue that federal background checks are unconstitutional! Hahahahahahaha!

I'm old enough to remember when the left claimed they supported background checks, and opposed illegal gun purchases and possession. Oh, well...

LOL

A Federal Judge Isn't Buying Hunter's Drugs and Guns Argument

townhall.com

"Defendant Robert Hunter Biden is charged with possession of a firearm by a prohibited person in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(3)1 and two false-statement counts under §§ 922(a)(6) and 924(a)(1)(A). Presently before the Court is Defendant’s motion to dismiss the indictment based on the Second Amendment. In particular, Defendant argues that the indictment must be dismissed because § 922(g)(3) is unconstitutional under the Supreme Court’s decision in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. Bruen, 597 U.S. 1 (2022). Defendant argues that the charges under §§ 922(a)(6) and 924(a)(1)(A) must be dismissed as well because his alleged false statements regarding drug use are only illegal if § 922(g)(3) is constitutional," U.S. District Judge Maryellen Noreika wrote Thursday. "For the reasons set forth below, Defendant’s motion is denied."

 

[Coyote]

What does what “the left” opposes/supports have to do with Hunter Biden, his lawyers, and their legal defense strategy?

As far as I know, he has never run for office, held office, passed legislation or made any speeches regarding gun control policy. Nor am I seeing “the left” swooping in to defend him on this.

 

[marvin martian]

What does what “the left” opposes/supports have to do with Hunter Biden, his lawyers, and their legal defense strategy?

As far as I know, he has never run for office, held office, passed legislation or made any speeches regarding gun control policy. Nor am I seeing “the left” swooping in to defend him on this.

Do you believe background checks are unconstitutional?

 

[Coyote]

Do you believe background checks are unconstitutional?

Nope.

 

[JGalt]

What does what “the left” opposes/supports have to do with Hunter Biden, his lawyers, and their legal defense strategy?

As far as I know, he has never run for office, held office, passed legislation or made any speeches regarding gun control policy. Nor am I seeing “the left” swooping in to defend him on this.

So Hunter Biden doesn't have to obey the same laws the rest of us do?

 

[Coyote]

So Hunter Biden doesn't have to obey the same laws the rest of us do?

According to who?

 

[Billiejeens]

So Hunter Biden doesn't have to obey the same laws the rest of us do?

No one named biden does.

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

So Hunter Biden doesn't have to obey the same laws the rest of us do?

No. Just as Mr. Trump, he doesn't.

You satisfied?

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

As I predicted, attorneys for Joe Biden's son tried to use the Second Amendment to argue that federal background checks are unconstitutional! Hahahahahahaha!

I'm old enough to remember when the left claimed they supported background checks, and opposed illegal gun purchases and possession. Oh, well...

LOL

A Federal Judge Isn't Buying Hunter's Drugs and Guns Argument

townhall.com

"Defendant Robert Hunter Biden is charged with possession of a firearm by a prohibited person in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(3)1 and two false-statement counts under §§ 922(a)(6) and 924(a)(1)(A). Presently before the Court is Defendant’s motion to dismiss the indictment based on the Second Amendment. In particular, Defendant argues that the indictment must be dismissed because § 922(g)(3) is unconstitutional under the Supreme Court’s decision in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. Bruen, 597 U.S. 1 (2022). Defendant argues that the charges under §§ 922(a)(6) and 924(a)(1)(A) must be dismissed as well because his alleged false statements regarding drug use are only illegal if § 922(g)(3) is constitutional," U.S. District Judge Maryellen Noreika wrote Thursday. "For the reasons set forth below, Defendant’s motion is denied."

and btw, the charge is not so serious. He was not in possession and involved in any violent crimes.


and you people should love this:
Likening drug users to people who are "mentally ill and dangerous," the ruling says barring them from owning firearms is not unconstitutional on its face.

and like with Trump, it's not over even if and when he is convicted:

Noreika's ruling leaves the door open to an "as-applied" challenge if and when Biden is convicted, meaning he can still argue that his prosecution violates the Second Amendment at that point. That claim may ultimately be resolved by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 3rd Circuit, which has yet to address the constitutionality of Section 922(g)(3) under the test that the U.S. Supreme Court established in the 2022 case New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. Bruen.*

And let it be known, Hunter Biden is not running for political office, though if he wins maybe he should. As a convicted man he'd certainly qualify as a MAGA candidate.

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

What does what “the left” opposes/supports have to do with Hunter Biden, his lawyers, and their legal defense strategy?

As far as I know, he has never run for office, held office, passed legislation or made any speeches regarding gun control policy. Nor am I seeing “the left” swooping in to defend him on this.

Bingo.

Here is why a federal judge rejected Hunter Biden's Second Amendment challenge to his gun charges

Likening drug users to people who are "mentally ill and dangerous," the ruling says barring them from owning firearms is not unconstitutional on its face.

reason.com

 

[Magnus]

As I predicted, attorneys for Joe Biden's son tried to use the Second Amendment to argue that federal background checks are unconstitutional! Hahahahahahaha!

I'm old enough to remember when the left claimed they supported background checks, and opposed illegal gun purchases and possession. Oh, well...

LOL

A Federal Judge Isn't Buying Hunter's Drugs and Guns Argument

townhall.com

"Defendant Robert Hunter Biden is charged with possession of a firearm by a prohibited person in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(3)1 and two false-statement counts under §§ 922(a)(6) and 924(a)(1)(A). Presently before the Court is Defendant’s motion to dismiss the indictment based on the Second Amendment. In particular, Defendant argues that the indictment must be dismissed because § 922(g)(3) is unconstitutional under the Supreme Court’s decision in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. Bruen, 597 U.S. 1 (2022). Defendant argues that the charges under §§ 922(a)(6) and 924(a)(1)(A) must be dismissed as well because his alleged false statements regarding drug use are only illegal if § 922(g)(3) is constitutional," U.S. District Judge Maryellen Noreika wrote Thursday. "For the reasons set forth below, Defendant’s motion is denied."

LOL Suddenly all the trumptards love our justice system.

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

"Defendant Robert Hunter Biden is charged with possession of a firearm by a prohibited person in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(3)1 and two false-statement counts under §§ 922(a)(6) and 924(a)(1)(A).

Wow!

Such crimes. I bet you want to see anyone and everyone charged with the same, locked up with key thrown away.

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

LOL Suddenly all the trumptards love our justice system.

And they now want people with these charges locked up. They've argued the opposite before -- when it didn't involve a Biden

 

[Billiejeens]

LOL Suddenly all the trumptards love our justice system.

That has never, not been so.

Thanks for playing.

 

[two_iron]

Drag that lowlife mother fucker through the mud. Get all the underaged prostitutes to testify... and get Natalie up there and ask her why mom banned Hunted from her house.... was it because she was caught smoking crack naked with Uncle Hunter and giving him a 'footjob' that he videoed? How old were you, sweetheart? 14??? Wow. Do you think your dead father wanted Hunter to molest you and your mom?

Make the "Laptop From Hell" Exhibit 1 thru 1500.

 

[marvin martian]

According to who?

His lawyers, and all your fellow leftists who cheered when it looked like he was going to get away with these crimes.

We'll see how you all react after the trial. It will be very telling, although you've already lost the "gun control" debate.

LOL

 

[Coyote]

Drag that lowlife mother fucker through the mud. Get all the underaged prostitutes to testify... and get Natalie up there and ask her why mom banned Hunted from her house.... was it because she was caught smoking crack naked with Uncle Hunter and giving him a 'footjob' that he videoed? How old were you, sweetheart? 14??? Wow. Do you think your dead father wanted Hunter to molest you and your mom?

Make the "Laptop From Hell" Exhibit 1 thru 1500.



View attachment 946261

 

[Billiejeens]

Drag that lowlife mother fucker through the mud. Get all the underaged prostitutes to testify... and get Natalie up there and ask her why mom banned Hunted from her house.... was it because she was caught smoking crack naked with Uncle Hunter and giving him a 'footjob' that he videoed? How old were you, sweetheart? 14??? Wow. Do you think your dead father wanted Hunter to molest you and your mom?

Make the "Laptop From Hell" Exhibit 1 thru 1500.



View attachment 946261

He literally should never be allowed in polite society again.
He absolutely qualifies for "habitual criminal" status.

 

[Coyote]

His lawyers,

Who are hired to do their job. Care to guess what a defense lawyers job is?

and all your fellow leftists who cheered when it looked like he was going to get away with these crimes.

Who? Can’t find any cheering.

Most seem to want him prosecuted like anyone else.

You are digging yourself in deeper trying to support a thread fail.

We'll see how you all react after the trial. It will be very telling, although you've already lost the "gun control" debate.

LOL

Unlike you, I believe our justice system is overall, a good one. I may not always agree with verdicts but it is by far a better, less corrupt system than most.

Your major fail here Marvin, is in thinking anyone (other than you guys) cares that much about Hunter Biden.

If he is found guilty, let the chips fall where they may.

 

[two_iron]

He literally should never be allowed in polite society again.
He absolutely qualifies for "habitual criminal" status.

Exactly. That lowlife fuck should be doing life with convicts that know what to do with pedophiles.

I like how the marxist parasites pretend there's not 500 MB of Hunter underaged porn available from the "Laptop From Hell".

At one time it was Russian disinformation (50 traitors signed off on it!) and now that it's been confirmed by the ny times and fbi, well it just doesn't exist. He did NOT rape and torture underage girls... don't believe your lying eyes!