Jill Biden Thinks It's Un-American To Oppose Porn in School Libraries

[Thinker101]

I would say exposure increases understanding when done appropriately… wouldn’t you agree?

Sure ZERO exposure is appropriate. We just need to make sure you loons to have a crystal-clear understanding.

 

[Slade3200]

Are parents allowed to impose universally harmful things onto their children before they can consent?

Yes, Parents are absolutely allowed to impose universally harmful things onto their children. They do it every day unfortunately. The lines on what society accepts are drawn by that society

 

[Slade3200]

Sure ZERO exposure is appropriate. We just need to make sure you loons to have a crystal-clear understanding.

Zero? So a child under 18 is not allowed to see hear or learn anything about sex? Just leave it to them to experiment and gossip and try to figure it out?

 

[Thinker101]

Zero? So a child under 18 is not allowed to see hear or learn anything about sex? Just leave it to them to experiment and gossip and try to figure it out?

That's up to the child's parents, not up to you perverts to decide what's appropriate.

 

[ActionJackson]

Jill Biden Thinks It's Un-American To Oppose Porn in School Libraries

pjmedia.com

Schools nationwide contain inappropriate and sometimes pornographic materials in their libraries, often under the guise of “inclusivity.” Thankfully, states like Florida are empowering parents to have more input over materials and curricula, and parents are starting to fight back against subversive and obscene materials being made available to their children.

And First Lady Jill Biden doesn’t like it one bit. In an interview with NBC News correspondent Sheinelle Jones, she argued that parents shouldn’t be able to exclude any books from school libraries.

“Parents and politicians are now weighing in on what books should be in our school libraries, and what their kids are being taught,” Jones began “Where’s the line, in your opinion, with how much of a say parents have when it comes to what their kids are learning in school? Is there a balance between, you know, ‘This book should be in the library, this book is under review—”

Wow. Quite the fake Catholic mom. Another filthy degenerate Biden.

Of course, she does. Chelsea Clinton agrees with her. The raunchier the school curriculum is, the better (if you're a Demwit).

 

[Mr. Friscus]

Yes, Parents are absolutely allowed to impose universally harmful things onto their children. They do it every day unfortunately. The lines on what society accepts are drawn by that society

If you polled the nation, what percentage of people would you guesstimate would approve of showing children pornography?

 

[JustAGuy1]

I don't care even the tiniest bit about whether those books are in a library or not. If there is child pornography in there, call the police. If the parents in those photos are carrying child pornography around with them, report them to the police.

Of course you don't care, you're a crap parent.

 

[Slade3200]

That's up to the child's parents, not up to you perverts to decide what's appropriate.

Exactly the point I made smart guy. Try and keep up

 

[JustAGuy1]

Zero? So a child under 18 is not allowed to see hear or learn anything about sex? Just leave it to them to experiment and gossip and try to figure it out?

The subject is porn son.

 

[Slade3200]

If you polled the nation, what percentage of people would you guesstimate would approve of showing children pornography?

I have no clue. I’m sure there a way to frame the polling question in a way that shows high negativity and another way that would result in high positivity

 

[Slade3200]

The subject is porn son.

I know. That’s what I was speaking to

 

[Mr. Friscus]

Morality is subjective to a degree. What causes harm being the primary measure. Also you’re jumping from the general term “porn” to “men dominating loose women”. So there is a variety of what may be appropriate and inappropriate within the world of “porn” and also a variety of thresholds for different people

I think in todays internet culture with simple access to hardcore pornography videos via the click of mouse, that’s what is assumed when discussing “porn”. To say it could be a playboy centerfold or something is outdated and in this context disingenuous.

Is having children watching common videos of transactional, emotionless, dominant sex on websites moral?

 

[Mr. Friscus]

I have no clue. I’m sure there a way to frame the polling question in a way that shows high negativity and another way that would result in high positivity

I think you’re lying to yourself. You do realize you aren’t a politician, don’t you?

 

[JustAGuy1]

I know. That’s what I was speaking to

My apologies.

 

[Mr. Friscus]

Yes, society has the right to act against anything they deem as harmful. The question still remains what is harmful and what is not harmful. Also where is the line between freedom and state regulation

Do you think young men learning about the treatment of women via watching women beg for pleasure as men treat them as simple holes to penetrate would not harm their perspective and behavior as they proceed into adulthood?

 

[Mr. Friscus]

I would say exposure increases understanding when done appropriately… wouldn’t you agree?

Of course that’s not what I was referring to.. a lesson on human anatomy is scientific. We’re talking about common modern porn.. the thing you keep trying to avoid

 

[Slade3200]

I think in todays internet culture with simple access to hardcore pornography videos via the click of mouse, that’s what is assumed when discussing “porn”. To say it could be a playboy centerfold or something is outdated and in this context disingenuous.

Is having children watching common videos of transactional, emotionless, dominant sex on websites moral?

Again it goes in degrees. What was once inappropriate porn… playboy… is now not considered porn? So is it only porn if it is emotionless and dominant and on video?

Who determines is it’s emotionless or not? What if dominant is a turn on to somebody, is it still harmful?

 

[Slade3200]

I think you’re lying to yourself. You do realize you aren’t a politician, don’t you?

I do realize that I’m not a politician nor do I want to be. Thanks for reminding me

 

[Slade3200]

Do you think young men learning about the treatment of women via watching women beg for pleasure as men treat them as simple holes to penetrate would not harm their perspective and behavior as they proceed into adulthood?

I would absolutely not show my kids that nor would I teach them that that treatment is ok. That would be my choice not the states choice

 

[Slade3200]

Of course that’s not what I was referring to.. a lesson on human anatomy is scientific. We’re talking about common modern porn.. the thing you keep trying to avoid

My point is that porn, whether it be modern or classic is diverse in content and interpretation. How exactly are you proposing to regulate it?