Jill Biden Thinks It's Un-American To Oppose Porn in School Libraries

[OhPleaseJustQuit]

I guess you’re all for showing 4th graders hardcore porn then?

And if not, why the change in standards?

.

Of course he/she/it is.

In the dating world, 4th graders don't fight back so hard.

.

 

[Mr. Friscus]

4th graders could care less about reading such the books you claim they would "If the got the Chance". Once again, you are spreading your hate.

So you do want 4th graders watching hardcore porn. Wow, you’re sick

 

[Curried Goats]

Hmm, ok, so the book banning was unwarranted, parents are just over reacting…hmm


Let’s look further so, one of the books on the list was “Gender Queer: a memoir”, what’s inside?

View attachment 770797



View attachment 770799


View attachment 770800


View attachment 770801

View attachment 770802


View attachment 770803


Hmm, yeah, totally appropriate for kids….

That’s one of the books right off the top. I’ll have to look into the others.

I don't find anything in there inappropriate for high-school or middle school children. In fact the author is discussing their own experience having grown up confused and uncertain in a culture and society that is afraid to accept that intimacy and sex are part of human development and we should be preparing young adults to handle it with maturity and without shame or ridicule.

 

[See50]

Piece of shit social conservatives have always been the backbone of book banning movements

The word pornography along with obscenity is a none legal emotional censor term. This is coming from the Conservative side of pseudo liberal dictatorship. Since both sides promote censorship. It isn't just the Conservative that promote censorship,in the name of the Christian god ,but the cowardly to pretense,half baked ,slightly more Conservative ,lesser liberals in the name of human rights. They are both wrong .The American library association condemns them both. The meaning of pornography is subjective .It is an insult terminology. The Hardcore sex business adapts it as a compliment to make sex images forbidden fruit to make taboo profit. To the eyes of the conservatives pornography is anything that goes against their politics,religion and morality. Not just sex and violence. They usually go after sex more than violence.They fear that sex in literature and art and film and theater,cable and internet as a competitive threat to their side of the church state sanction ,one on one ,procreation marriage. They also fear violence ,that it might be causing crime in the real world.They also fear that their victims might get ideas from a brutal movie to get rid of Conservative. The fake and cowardly side of less middle- more Conservative liberalism sex and violence too. They go after sex cause they see it as a threat to their side of church state marriage to none marriage monogamy and what they see as morally private and personal. They oppose violence in fiction too out of fear it might cause the viewer and reader to be violent and harm someone. They oppose subjective views of women and minorites out of fear that the cowardly half baked liberal has that it might cause secondary effects on them plus they are too cowardly to go after real brutality. They promote censorship against criticism ,slurs, ,name calling,insults that are directed against human rights that the cowardly and fake liberals sincerely and pretentiously are for They also promote censorship against history that goes against human rights ,they claim to be for ,and goes against their ideology. They are too pretentious to cowardly to go after the actions of bigotry,current. The conservatives also go after history that goes against their ideology and sacred calf's too. Their actions are fueled by the cowardly and pretentious of the other side.

 

[hadit]

He can't find a job so he does this crap to attempt to stay relevant.

Wow, those grapes were really sour, weren't they?

 

[Vrenn]

So you do want 4th graders watching hardcore porn. Wow, you’re sick

Keep spreading that fear and hate.

 

[OhPleaseJustQuit]

Keep spreading that fear and hate.

.



Of course it won't answer a direct question.

Do you want 4th graders watching porn?






.

 

[Slade3200]

.



Of course it won't answer a direct question.

Do you want 4th graders watching porn?






.

Wait… you actually expect people to answer direct questions?!?! The Queen iof refusing to answer direct questions?! That’s rich

 

[Mr. Friscus]

Keep spreading that fear and hate.

Hey, you keep desiring indecent exposure to children, sicko. You should probably be on some sort of list if you think that, if you’re not already.

 

[Mr. Friscus]

Wait… you actually expect people to answer direct questions?!?! The Queen iof refusing to answer direct questions?! That’s rich

How about you? Should kids watch porn?

 

[Slade3200]

How about you? Should kids watch porn?

Should kids watch porn? Like video of adults having sex? Not something I’d have on rotation in my household

 

[Mr. Friscus]

Should kids watch porn? Like video of adults having sex? Not something I’d have on rotation in my household

You avoided the question.

Should it be…
1. Legal and/or allowed
2. Shameful
3. Considered perverse

… to show kids pornography?

 

[Vrenn]

Hey, you keep desiring indecent exposure to children, sicko. You should probably be on some sort of list if you think that, if you’re not already.

And more hate and fear coming from your foul person. Yuppers, you are a MAGAt alright.

 

[Vrenn]

You avoided the question.

Should it be…
1. Legal and/or allowed
2. Shameful
3. Considered perverse

… to show kids pornography?

Then I suggest you stop showing your kids the pornography. It's not my choice, it's yours.

 

[Slade3200]

You avoided the question.

Should it be…
1. Legal and/or allowed
2. Shameful
3. Considered perverse

… to show kids pornography?

You didn’t ask about legality. Now that you did I’ll answer. I don’t think watching porn should be illegal or regulated by the state. If two parents decide to raise their children in a sexually open environment then that is their choice. If sexual acts are performed on children then whomever is responsible should be arrested

 

[Mr. Friscus]

You didn’t ask about legality. Now that you did I’ll answer. I don’t think watching porn should be illegal or regulated by the state. If two parents decide to raise their children in a sexually open environment then that is their choice. If sexual acts are performed on children then whomever is responsible should be arrested

What about morally? Is there anything immoral, shameful, or perverse in exposing a child to primarily men objectifying and sexually dominating loose, submissive women?

Is this harmful to the child’s understanding of other humans of the opposite sex?

Does society have a right to act against the harmful psychological effects and long term harmful social effects this has as children become adults? (Do you think parents should be allowed have their kids aggressively use/become addicted to cigarettes or alcohol?)

Are parents allowed to impose universally harmful things onto their children before they can consent?

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Jill Biden Thinks It's Un-American To Oppose Porn in School Libraries

pjmedia.com

Schools nationwide contain inappropriate and sometimes pornographic materials in their libraries, often under the guise of “inclusivity.” Thankfully, states like Florida are empowering parents to have more input over materials and curricula, and parents are starting to fight back against subversive and obscene materials being made available to their children.

And First Lady Jill Biden doesn’t like it one bit. In an interview with NBC News correspondent Sheinelle Jones, she argued that parents shouldn’t be able to exclude any books from school libraries.

“Parents and politicians are now weighing in on what books should be in our school libraries, and what their kids are being taught,” Jones began “Where’s the line, in your opinion, with how much of a say parents have when it comes to what their kids are learning in school? Is there a balance between, you know, ‘This book should be in the library, this book is under review—”

Wow. Quite the fake Catholic mom. Another filthy degenerate Biden.

Is this the same lady who allowed her husband to shower with their daughter?

 

[Slade3200]

What about morally? Is there anything immoral, shameful, or perverse in exposing a child to primarily men objectifying and sexually dominating loose, submissive women?

Morality is subjective to a degree. What causes harm being the primary measure. Also you’re jumping from the general term “porn” to “men dominating loose women”. So there is a variety of what may be appropriate and inappropriate within the world of “porn” and also a variety of thresholds for different people

 

[Slade3200]

Is this harmful to the child’s understanding of other humans of the opposite sex?

I would say exposure increases understanding when done appropriately… wouldn’t you agree?

 

[Slade3200]

Does society have a right to act against the harmful psychological effects and long term harmful social effects this has as children become adults? (Do you think parents should be allowed have their kids aggressively use/become addicted to cigarettes or alcohol?)

Yes, society has the right to act against anything they deem as harmful. The question still remains what is harmful and what is not harmful. Also where is the line between freedom and state regulation