60 Minutes goes after Moms for Liberty

TroglocratsRdumb

Diamond Member
Aug 11, 2017
36,082
46,089
2,915

A 60 Minutes segment on Sunday night focused on the “growing trend of right-wing book bans” that they report were inspired, in part, by the parental rights group Moms for Liberty.

The report by correspondent Scott Pelley featured a sit-down interview with the group’s co-founders, Tina Descovich and Tiffany Justice. Pelley opened his report before his interview with the group leaders by chiding activist parents fighting against sexually explicit materials in school libraries as pushing “conspiracy theories” and claimed they “threatened librarians,” in addition to calling school board members “groomers.”

60 Minutes initially focused on Beaufort, South Carolina and reported that their book battle was about “mostly young adult novels with minority, gay, lesbian or transgender characters” and were in mostly “high school libraries.”

“Billboard Chris” Elston responded on social media to the 60 Minutes report, calling the show “dishonest” and slammed them for misreporting key details about the group that “anyone who did 3 seconds of research would know.”

Comment:
60 Minutes is not honest journalism, and they went after Moms for Liberty for wanting to protect their children from the Radical Left educators who are putting gay pedophile porn in the school libraries.
60 Minute has a long history shady editing and biased reporting.
Mainstream parents do not want gay porn in their public-school libraries and 60 Minutes thinks that Moms for Liberty are being intolerant.
Why does the Left demand that gay porn be put in the school libraries?
What is the purpose?
 
60 Minutes, like all MSM and lefty shills, have to cover for the groomers want to destroy kids with transgenderism nonsense and the perversion of homosexuality.
It looks like Gay Groomers have taken over the public education system.
They don't want parents to have any say in their children's education.
They can't give you an honest answer why they demand to have gay porn in the school libraries.
 
Last edited:
Moms for Liberty is just another MAGA hypocritical organization. I find it amusing that an organization that has liberty in its name is against liberty. Those idiots couldn’t even articulate why they were against certain books. Furthermore, these hypocrites who are ostensibly for parental freedom want to choose want other kids could read and not read. “Liberty” to these folks means freedom to do what they say and want.

If you want reduced freedom and choice, vote MAGA.
 
Moms for Liberty is just another MAGA hypocritical organization. I find it amusing that an organization that has liberty in its name is against liberty. Those idiots couldn’t even articulate why they were against certain books. Furthermore, these hypocrites who are ostensibly for parental freedom want to choose want other kids could read and not read. “Liberty” to these folks means freedom to do what they say and want.

If you want reduced freedom and choice, vote MAGA.
Why do Democrats want gay porn in the school libraries?
If Democrat Parents want to expose their young sons to gay porn, they can just buy it for them.
 

A 60 Minutes segment on Sunday night focused on the “growing trend of right-wing book bans” that they report were inspired, in part, by the parental rights group Moms for Liberty.

The report by correspondent Scott Pelley featured a sit-down interview with the group’s co-founders, Tina Descovich and Tiffany Justice. Pelley opened his report before his interview with the group leaders by chiding activist parents fighting against sexually explicit materials in school libraries as pushing “conspiracy theories” and claimed they “threatened librarians,” in addition to calling school board members “groomers.”

60 Minutes initially focused on Beaufort, South Carolina and reported that their book battle was about “mostly young adult novels with minority, gay, lesbian or transgender characters” and were in mostly “high school libraries.”

“Billboard Chris” Elston responded on social media to the 60 Minutes report, calling the show “dishonest” and slammed them for misreporting key details about the group that “anyone who did 3 seconds of research would know.”

Comment:
60 Minutes is not honest journalism, and they went after Moms for Liberty for wanting to protect their children from the Radical Left educators who are putting gay pedophile porn in the school libraries.
60 Minute has a long history shady editing and biased reporting.
Mainstream parents do not want gay porn in their public-school libraries and 60 Minutes thinks that Moms for Liberty are being intolerant.
Why does the Left demand that gay porn be put in the school libraries?
What is the purpose?
Comment:
Mom's for Liberty actively engaged in everything above they are accused of. They are one step (barely) above a white nationalist advocacy group.
Their goal is to stoke hatred and bigotry. Because no library I know of has gay porn in it. :)
 
Why do Democrats want gay porn in the school libraries?
If Democrat Parents want to expose their young sons to gay porn, they can just buy it for them.
In the 60 Minutes piece these hypocrites were seeking to ban books because of a single sentence in a book they found objectionable. If a book in a high school library who the hell are you to tell someone that book should not be read. Ironically, it was conservatives who were the ones leading the charge against Moms for Liberty in SC because even they were appalled at what those hypocrites were attempting in banning 97 books. What was even a bigger joke is these Moms for Liberty did not even read the books they were seeking to ban.
 
Last edited:
It looks like Gay Groomers have taken over the public education system.
The don't want parents to have any say in their children's education.
They can't give you an honest answer why they demand to have gay porn in the school libraries.

It's a big industry now. Several billionaires are funding it all.


Obama's 'education czar' was a huge fan of pedophile Harry Hay, founder of the gay rights hoax in the U.S.
 

A 60 Minutes segment on Sunday night focused on the “growing trend of right-wing book bans” that they report were inspired, in part, by the parental rights group Moms for Liberty.

The report by correspondent Scott Pelley featured a sit-down interview with the group’s co-founders, Tina Descovich and Tiffany Justice. Pelley opened his report before his interview with the group leaders by chiding activist parents fighting against sexually explicit materials in school libraries as pushing “conspiracy theories” and claimed they “threatened librarians,” in addition to calling school board members “groomers.”

60 Minutes initially focused on Beaufort, South Carolina and reported that their book battle was about “mostly young adult novels with minority, gay, lesbian or transgender characters” and were in mostly “high school libraries.”

“Billboard Chris” Elston responded on social media to the 60 Minutes report, calling the show “dishonest” and slammed them for misreporting key details about the group that “anyone who did 3 seconds of research would know.”

Comment:
60 Minutes is not honest journalism, and they went after Moms for Liberty for wanting to protect their children from the Radical Left educators who are putting gay pedophile porn in the school libraries.
60 Minute has a long history shady editing and biased reporting.
Mainstream parents do not want gay porn in their public-school libraries and 60 Minutes thinks that Moms for Liberty are being intolerant.
Why does the Left demand that gay porn be put in the school libraries?
What is the purpose?
"What is the purpose?" Anti Christian values comes to mind here. Sure, a few churches are still getting torched(Canada) but it's far more effective to destroy a congregation of folks with porno/perversion than it is to burn down a structure that a congregation meets within. One congregation(Canada) cleaned up the remnants of their torched church then folks started bringing folding chairs & a portable pulpit so they could have outdoor sermons! It may not be a sermon on the mount but talk about following in Makers footsteps!!!
 

A 60 Minutes segment on Sunday night focused on the “growing trend of right-wing book bans” that they report were inspired, in part, by the parental rights group Moms for Liberty.

The report by correspondent Scott Pelley featured a sit-down interview with the group’s co-founders, Tina Descovich and Tiffany Justice. Pelley opened his report before his interview with the group leaders by chiding activist parents fighting against sexually explicit materials in school libraries as pushing “conspiracy theories” and claimed they “threatened librarians,” in addition to calling school board members “groomers.”

60 Minutes initially focused on Beaufort, South Carolina and reported that their book battle was about “mostly young adult novels with minority, gay, lesbian or transgender characters” and were in mostly “high school libraries.”

“Billboard Chris” Elston responded on social media to the 60 Minutes report, calling the show “dishonest” and slammed them for misreporting key details about the group that “anyone who did 3 seconds of research would know.”

Comment:
60 Minutes is not honest journalism, and they went after Moms for Liberty for wanting to protect their children from the Radical Left educators who are putting gay pedophile porn in the school libraries.
60 Minute has a long history shady editing and biased reporting.
Mainstream parents do not want gay porn in their public-school libraries and 60 Minutes thinks that Moms for Liberty are being intolerant.
Why does the Left demand that gay porn be put in the school libraries?
What is the purpose?
Pelley is full of shit

Just a typical 60 Minutes lib
 

A 60 Minutes segment on Sunday night focused on the “growing trend of right-wing book bans” that they report were inspired, in part, by the parental rights group Moms for Liberty.

The report by correspondent Scott Pelley featured a sit-down interview with the group’s co-founders, Tina Descovich and Tiffany Justice. Pelley opened his report before his interview with the group leaders by chiding activist parents fighting against sexually explicit materials in school libraries as pushing “conspiracy theories” and claimed they “threatened librarians,” in addition to calling school board members “groomers.”

60 Minutes initially focused on Beaufort, South Carolina and reported that their book battle was about “mostly young adult novels with minority, gay, lesbian or transgender characters” and were in mostly “high school libraries.”

“Billboard Chris” Elston responded on social media to the 60 Minutes report, calling the show “dishonest” and slammed them for misreporting key details about the group that “anyone who did 3 seconds of research would know.”

Comment:
60 Minutes is not honest journalism, and they went after Moms for Liberty for wanting to protect their children from the Radical Left educators who are putting gay pedophile porn in the school libraries.
60 Minute has a long history shady editing and biased reporting.
Mainstream parents do not want gay porn in their public-school libraries and 60 Minutes thinks that Moms for Liberty are being intolerant.
Why does the Left demand that gay porn be put in the school libraries?
What is the purpose?
Moms 4 Threesomes are fair game. They are loony bitches with too much time on their hands.
 

Forum List

Back
Top