tinydancer
Diamond Member
And think of ALL THE Democrats who wanted Comey's head on a platter and wanted him fired. Were they trying to obstruct justice?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
I don't think any of us really know what the Mueller investigation team has in their
Pocket.....
We are guessing that it is obstruction of justice but this investigation goes much deeper than pastry....And not a peep is leaked by them.... Trump team was shocked about the charges and agreement to cooperate by Pappadopolous, and shocked by Flynns plea deal and cooperation.....neither of those two people cooperating with the investigation, are
cooperating for an obstruction charge against Trump, they have information pertinent to the Russian interference investigation....
Patience is a virtue....
There's obstruction and there's attempted obstruction.That interpretation is where it'll get sticky. If you have a President who is immune from the law at that scale, that would be considered too far for many, and I'd guess there are a few Republicans who would have a problem with it.Well, Napolitano is a libertarian former judge who now works for Fox.Trump is considered the number one law officer in the country. It's one of the president's many titles. Legally, whatever he does cannot be obstruction. Per judge Andrew Napolitano!
Not sure how much legal faith you want to put into his opinion.
.
Dershowitz came out swinging at the bullshit of "obstruction of justice" as well. According to him, you can't impeach Trump for exercizing sp his constitutional authority.
.
Think about this. He fired Comey which was his right to do so, but the investigation kept on going. It's still going. What was obstructed?
More importantly, I'm not a lawyer.
.
Other important details..... Flynn had been fired and was no longer part of the Trump administration. Comey told Trump that he was not under investigation....which was later confirmed by congressional hearings. Considering those facts, how could firing Comey be obstruction of justice.There's obstruction and there's attempted obstruction.That interpretation is where it'll get sticky. If you have a President who is immune from the law at that scale, that would be considered too far for many, and I'd guess there are a few Republicans who would have a problem with it.Well, Napolitano is a libertarian former judge who now works for Fox.
Not sure how much legal faith you want to put into his opinion.
.
Dershowitz came out swinging at the bullshit of "obstruction of justice" as well. According to him, you can't impeach Trump for exercizing sp his constitutional authority.
.
Think about this. He fired Comey which was his right to do so, but the investigation kept on going. It's still going. What was obstructed?
More importantly, I'm not a lawyer.
.
The media keeps leaving out the most important part of the Comey testimony re: Trump supposedly asking about Flynn. And that Trump also told Comey he wanted the FBI to get to the bottom of the potential collusion and nail anyone who was guilty.
keep wishing & dreaming!!! Btw, your process charge is a FELONY.I don't think any of us really know what the Mueller investigation team has in their
Pocket.....
We are guessing that it is obstruction of justice but this investigation goes much deeper than pastry....And not a peep is leaked by them.... Trump team was shocked about the charges and agreement to cooperate by Pappadopolous, and shocked by Flynns plea deal and cooperation.....neither of those two people cooperating with the investigation, are
cooperating for an obstruction charge against Trump, they have information pertinent to the Russian interference investigation....
Patience is a virtue....
Sure...and after a year, flynn is hit with a process chartered while mueller keeps bumbling along with no evidence of anything.
/threadI don't think any of us really know what the Mueller investigation team has in their
Pocket.....
We are guessing that it is obstruction of justice but this investigation goes much deeper than pastry....And not a peep is leaked by them.... Trump team was shocked about the charges and agreement to cooperate by Pappadopolous, and shocked by Flynns plea deal and cooperation.....neither of those two people cooperating with the investigation, are
cooperating for an obstruction charge against Trump, they have information pertinent to the Russian interference investigation....
Patience is a virtue....
Sure...and after a year, flynn is hit with a process charge while mueller keeps bumbling along with no evidence of anything.
He told Trump he was not an individual TARGET of the investigation, but the Trump campaign team was a focus in his investigation.... it's kinda hard to figure the Trump team was under investigation but the head of the Trump team would not be?Other important details..... Flynn had been fired and was no longer part of the Trump administration. Comey told Trump that he was not under investigation....which was later confirmed by congressional hearings. Considering those facts, how could firing Comey be obstruction of justice.There's obstruction and there's attempted obstruction.That interpretation is where it'll get sticky. If you have a President who is immune from the law at that scale, that would be considered too far for many, and I'd guess there are a few Republicans who would have a problem with it.Dershowitz came out swinging at the bullshit of "obstruction of justice" as well. According to him, you can't impeach Trump for exercizing sp his constitutional authority.
.
Think about this. He fired Comey which was his right to do so, but the investigation kept on going. It's still going. What was obstructed?
More importantly, I'm not a lawyer.
.
The media keeps leaving out the most important part of the Comey testimony re: Trump supposedly asking about Flynn. And that Trump also told Comey he wanted the FBI to get to the bottom of the potential collusion and nail anyone who was guilty.
Then Comey should not have said that Trump was not under investigation. That is on Comey.......He told Trump he was not an individual TARGET of the investigation, but the Trump campaign team was a focus in his investigation.... it's kinda hard to figure the Trump team was under investigation but the head of the Trump team would not be?Other important details..... Flynn had been fired and was no longer part of the Trump administration. Comey told Trump that he was not under investigation....which was later confirmed by congressional hearings. Considering those facts, how could firing Comey be obstruction of justice.There's obstruction and there's attempted obstruction.That interpretation is where it'll get sticky. If you have a President who is immune from the law at that scale, that would be considered too far for many, and I'd guess there are a few Republicans who would have a problem with it.
.
Think about this. He fired Comey which was his right to do so, but the investigation kept on going. It's still going. What was obstructed?
More importantly, I'm not a lawyer.
.
The media keeps leaving out the most important part of the Comey testimony re: Trump supposedly asking about Flynn. And that Trump also told Comey he wanted the FBI to get to the bottom of the potential collusion and nail anyone who was guilty.
Not sure why this matters so much. Maybe he wasn't, at the time. Things change.Then Comey should not have said that Trump was not under investigation. That is on Comey.......He told Trump he was not an individual TARGET of the investigation, but the Trump campaign team was a focus in his investigation.... it's kinda hard to figure the Trump team was under investigation but the head of the Trump team would not be?Other important details..... Flynn had been fired and was no longer part of the Trump administration. Comey told Trump that he was not under investigation....which was later confirmed by congressional hearings. Considering those facts, how could firing Comey be obstruction of justice.There's obstruction and there's attempted obstruction.Think about this. He fired Comey which was his right to do so, but the investigation kept on going. It's still going. What was obstructed?
More importantly, I'm not a lawyer.
.
The media keeps leaving out the most important part of the Comey testimony re: Trump supposedly asking about Flynn. And that Trump also told Comey he wanted the FBI to get to the bottom of the potential collusion and nail anyone who was guilty.
Pointless bullshit wasting my tax dollars.
Yea yea I get the endless Clinton investigation defense but that shit was not a direct attempt to usurp the will of the people.
Democrats are DUMBFUCKS If they think this shit is a winner
Sometimes timing is everything.Not sure why this matters so much. Maybe he wasn't, at the time. Things change.Then Comey should not have said that Trump was not under investigation. That is on Comey.......He told Trump he was not an individual TARGET of the investigation, but the Trump campaign team was a focus in his investigation.... it's kinda hard to figure the Trump team was under investigation but the head of the Trump team would not be?Other important details..... Flynn had been fired and was no longer part of the Trump administration. Comey told Trump that he was not under investigation....which was later confirmed by congressional hearings. Considering those facts, how could firing Comey be obstruction of justice.There's obstruction and there's attempted obstruction.
More importantly, I'm not a lawyer.
.
The media keeps leaving out the most important part of the Comey testimony re: Trump supposedly asking about Flynn. And that Trump also told Comey he wanted the FBI to get to the bottom of the potential collusion and nail anyone who was guilty.
.
2 guilty pleas and 2 more under house arrest. No evidence of anything?I don't think any of us really know what the Mueller investigation team has in their
Pocket.....
We are guessing that it is obstruction of justice but this investigation goes much deeper than pastry....And not a peep is leaked by them.... Trump team was shocked about the charges and agreement to cooperate by Pappadopolous, and shocked by Flynns plea deal and cooperation.....neither of those two people cooperating with the investigation, are
cooperating for an obstruction charge against Trump, they have information pertinent to the Russian interference investigation....
Patience is a virtue....
Sure...and after a year, flynn is hit with a process charge while mueller keeps bumbling along with no evidence of anything.
Has Trump pled? Is he on house arrest? Are you a fucking retard?2 guilty pleas and 2 more under house arrest. No evidence of anything?I don't think any of us really know what the Mueller investigation team has in their
Pocket.....
We are guessing that it is obstruction of justice but this investigation goes much deeper than pastry....And not a peep is leaked by them.... Trump team was shocked about the charges and agreement to cooperate by Pappadopolous, and shocked by Flynns plea deal and cooperation.....neither of those two people cooperating with the investigation, are
cooperating for an obstruction charge against Trump, they have information pertinent to the Russian interference investigation....
Patience is a virtue....
Sure...and after a year, flynn is hit with a process charge while mueller keeps bumbling along with no evidence of anything.
Retards are those that think this is going away and Trump will serve 2 terms.Has Trump pled? Is he on house arrest? Are you a fucking retard?2 guilty pleas and 2 more under house arrest. No evidence of anything?I don't think any of us really know what the Mueller investigation team has in their
Pocket.....
We are guessing that it is obstruction of justice but this investigation goes much deeper than pastry....And not a peep is leaked by them.... Trump team was shocked about the charges and agreement to cooperate by Pappadopolous, and shocked by Flynns plea deal and cooperation.....neither of those two people cooperating with the investigation, are
cooperating for an obstruction charge against Trump, they have information pertinent to the Russian interference investigation....
Patience is a virtue....
Sure...and after a year, flynn is hit with a process charge while mueller keeps bumbling along with no evidence of anything.
I haven't made any predictions dumbass. Next time you want to TRY to insult someone do a little research on their positions before making wild ASSumptions.Retards are those that think this is going away and Trump will serve 2 terms.Has Trump pled? Is he on house arrest? Are you a fucking retard?2 guilty pleas and 2 more under house arrest. No evidence of anything?I don't think any of us really know what the Mueller investigation team has in their
Pocket.....
We are guessing that it is obstruction of justice but this investigation goes much deeper than pastry....And not a peep is leaked by them.... Trump team was shocked about the charges and agreement to cooperate by Pappadopolous, and shocked by Flynns plea deal and cooperation.....neither of those two people cooperating with the investigation, are
cooperating for an obstruction charge against Trump, they have information pertinent to the Russian interference investigation....
Patience is a virtue....
Sure...and after a year, flynn is hit with a process charge while mueller keeps bumbling along with no evidence of anything.
...The Trumpsters may be right that the collusion story is fading,
but they may have bigger things to worry about. It would be easier to prove obstruction, especially considering the way Trump just can't keep his tweet shut:.
No crime is it?I thought it was about finding evidence of collusion, no?