By reading articles from both sides is how one makes determinations on issues, not taking spun info as fact.That's is my point.
Nice try.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
By reading articles from both sides is how one makes determinations on issues, not taking spun info as fact.That's is my point.
Articles are not a substitute for the rule of law.By reading articles from both sides is how one makes determinations on issues, not taking spun info as fact.
Nice try.
When sourced to the law they are....who said they were?Articles are not a substitute for the rule of law.
Lying to congress......process crimes.Roger stone
So where's he at?Konstantin kilimnik
Just a tad busy with all the 1/6 attempted self-coup and election subversion investigations ....which was gravely worse, I would suppose?If you recall, the report:
-Proved Trump committed 10 counts of felony obstruction.
-Stated the only reason Mueller did not seek indictments is he could not indict a sitting President.
If you further recall:
-Mueller was very clear that a President -can- be indicted once out of office.
Trump left office 39 months ago.
No grand jury, no indictments.
As desperate as the lunatic left is to convict Trump of something, you think they’d be all over this.
So.... why hasn't he been prosecuted for these slam-dunk cases of obstruction?
You asked for people convicted of obstruction. Not sure where they are at or if it's a process crime.When sourced to the law they are....who said they were?
Lying to congress......process crimes.
So where's he at?
And not, not once, ask why the Biden DoJ hasn't indicted him for those 10 counts of obstruction.And 5 years in denial later the Lib loons still wail that we read his words and conclusions incorrectly .
Sarbanes-Oxley................the one that SCOTUS is most likely to toss from J6.....doesn't matter much now, Stone's a free man.You asked for people convicted of obstruction. Not sure where they are at or if it's a process crime.
Ha ha ha.......coming from a troll of your caliber, I'll take that as a compliment.Not going to do a deep dive into your goalpost shifting.
But they were convicted of obstruction, right?Sarbanes-Oxley................the one that SCOTUS is most likely to toss from J6.....doesn't matter much now, Stone's a free man.
Freebie: Process crimes are usually for lying.....or being trick f**ked into lying.
Ha ha ha.......coming from a troll of your caliber, I'll take that as a compliment.
Sometime after they hung that guy in Florida named 'Chad'.............never been the same since then.The day lib loons discarded reality and they have not returned to it
If you recall, the report:
-Proved Trump committed 10 counts of felony obstruction.
-Stated the only reason Mueller did not seek indictments is he could not indict a sitting President.
If you further recall:
-Mueller was very clear that a President -can- be indicted once out of office.
Trump left office 39 months ago.
No grand jury, no indictments.
As desperate as the lunatic left is to convict Trump of something, you think they’d be all over this.
So.... why hasn't he been prosecuted for these slam-dunk cases of obstruction?
I heard you are an old user here hiding under a new name. Is it trueYou have unwittingly triggered one of the most infected loons here.
Drag name: Elektra
Nope. Ask BackAgain about it. Or are you accusing he and a few others here - ahem -- of hiding?I heard you are an old user here hiding under a new name. Is it true
Misrepresent things? Go ahead. No one listens to you anyways.6 pages, and no explanation as to why the Biden DoJ has not indicted/prosecuted Trump for any of those 10 slam-dunk cases of obstruction, supposedly proven by the Mueller report.
Hmmm.
Crusty Prostate ^ is “the dainty.”Nope. Ask BackAgain about it. Or are you accusing he and a few others here - ahem -- of hiding?
Take it to the Flame Zone you whiny little bastard. Stop hijacking and derailing threads in order to puff up your chest.Crusty Prostate ^ is “the dainty.”
He is the little twat formerly known as “Dante” and “Dante Reawakened.” Long time troll that he is, he comes under different rancid usernames. But, he remains consistently dishonest and plodding.
His prissy reference to me (about whom he has an obsession) is that I have also changed usernames. I have.
I cleverly tried to conceal that I was formerly Liability when I chose the username “BackAgain” figuring that nobody would ever figure out what that new username implied.
Plus, of course, I announced it quite openly in my effort to conceal it.
Don’t take Crusty Prostate too seriously. Nobody does.
Stop doing the very thing you’re crying about. Your hypocrisy is well established. It is legendary.Take it to the Flame Zone you whiny little bastard. Stop hijacking and derailing threads in order to puff up your chest.