I read 100% in English, so much so that the word affidavit does not appear on Rule 41.
um that’s a rule about motion for summary judgment in a civil suit you dumb duckI read 100% in English, so much so that the word affidavit does not appear on Rule 41.
BUT.......LOOK what I found......
Here is the REAL Federal Rule ABOUT affidavits. Enjoy the reading.
Rule 56. Summary Judgment
www.law.cornell.edu
You do not have anything. Rule 41 is about search warrants. Find the right paragraph, copy and paste or forever hold your peace.
haha you clearly can’t read…you posted a link to summary judgements in civil cases and thought it was about search warrants! hahaha
You are lying. You do not want to go through the whole thing. You are lazy and contemptible.
i’m lying! you literally posted a link to the federal rule on summary judgment and thought it was about affidavits
I’m lying! hahah
hahahaI read 100% in English, so much so that the word affidavit does not appear on Rule 41.
BUT.......LOOK what I found......
Here is the REAL Federal Rule ABOUT affidavits. Enjoy the reading.
Rule 56. Summary Judgment
It is the only rule which refers to it. Rule 41 does not even mention the word affidavit.
We are the ones laughing at your endless dodging, like a little thief who does not want to be caught.
Try this Rule: [ When you find something......]
yes an affidavit can be used as part of motion for summary judge…in a civil case
um maybe if you’d read rule for 41 instead of the rule on summary judgments in civil cases you dumbassWe are the ones laughing at your endless dodging, like a little thief who does not want to be caught.
Where is your affidavit paragraph, etc on rule 41?
It does not exist.
what about it? we aren’t talking about motijs we are talking about search warrantsTry this Rule: [ When you find something......]
Rule 47. Motions and Supporting Affidavits
https://www.law.cornell.edu › rules › frcrmp › rule_47
A responding party must serve any opposing affidavit at least one day before the hearing, unless the court permits later service.
Rule 47. Motions and Supporting Affidavits
You have spent half an hour or more running away from copying and posting the paragraph in question.
We are talking about Affidavits, NOT. Search Warrants. Two different documents.
affidavits are part of the search warrant…just like they can be part of motions, as you have shown by bouncing around posting rules from Federal Civil procedure, and ignoring Federal Criminal Prcedure Rule 41 you idiot
But they are two different documents, right?
Here, Lawyer, the purpose of each:
www.newsnationnow.com
they are part of the warrant and can be part of motions
i know the purpose of a search warrant, and why an affidavit is a necessary part of one. xiden and garland were hoping to keep that critical part of rhe warrant sealedHere, Lawyer, the purpose of each:
SEARCH WARRANT
“With a warrant, simply what they have is something that has been issued by a judge, and they are able to go into the home and seize the items that the judge has given them permission to seize,” she said.
AFFIDAVIT
“The affidavit is going to be that probable cause they have gained in order to be able to receive that warrant that is given to a judge.”
PROPERTY RECEIPT
“A property receipt is something that you leave when you leave whatever the place is that you have served that warrant at. It is generally a list of items that were taken. In this case, obviously, it’s broad because some of those items were classified.”
What's the difference between a search warrant, affidavit and property receipt
Tracy Walder, a former CIA officer and FBI special agent, joined NewsNation’s “Rush Hour” to explain the differences between a search warrant, an affidavit and a property receipt.
