"It's not theirs, Its mine"

[jc456]

But you cannot find them?

looks like it's you who doesn't have a clue how to use the internet.

 

[Marener]

No, I don't...it's extraordinary for the Govt to request it to be under seal. That's a rarity. They are ususally attached to the warrant and filed in the Court house for the public to view if it decides to

Search warrants are rarely unsealed. Here’s why.

Thousands of federal search warrants, like the one used by the FBI to raid former...

www.timesunion.com

Wrong

 

[struth]

You mentioned them. Post them.

they are huge i’m not posting them on. Go to their website, Ruke 41

 

[struth]

Search warrants are rarely unsealed. Here’s why.

Thousands of federal search warrants, like the one used by the FBI to raid former...

www.timesunion.com

Wrong

haha no your dembot propagandist are lying to you. The default is they are unsealed…xiden has to ask the court to seal them

 

[Marener]

haha no your dembot propagandist are lying to you. The default is they are unsealed…xiden has to ask the court to seal them

I’m right. You’re the liar. Article backs me up. You have nothing.

 

[Sixties Fan]

haha no your dembot propagandist are lying to you. The default is they are unsealed…xiden has to ask the court to seal them

Maybe that is the new Republican way, because other wise the law has been quite different for the whole country for a long time, and you cannot post a link, I did not ask to post the whole thing, if your life depended on it.

 

[struth]

I’m right. You’re the liar. Article backs me up. You have nothing.

haha the op.ed isn’t based on facts and backs nothing up.

Read th Federal Rules for Criminal Procedure

it’s public.

It’s free

but wait then youll know the truth and not what some propagandist tells you

 

[struth]

Maybe that is the new Republican way, because other wise the law has been quite different for the whole country for a long time, and you cannot post a link, I did not ask to post the whole thing, if your life depended on it.

yes it’s the Gop way not to keep them hidden and sealed from public view

Democracy dies in darkness

 

[Sixties Fan]

haha the op.ed isn’t based on facts and backs nothing up.

Read th Federal Rules for Criminal Procedure

it’s public.

It’s free

but wait then youll know the truth and not what some propagandist tells you

NO LINK, No Truth. You dodge more than a football player trying to touchdown.

 

[Sixties Fan]

yes it’s the Gop way not to keep them hidden and sealed from public view

Democracy dies in darkness

Nothing but endless BS which has nothing to do with the laws you cannot post a link to.

 

[struth]

NO LINK, No Truth. You doge more than a football player trying to touchdown.

sorry you are having a hard time finding the federal rules…sad really

 

[Sixties Fan]

sorry you are having a hard time finding the federal rules…sad really

I am waiting for you to find them. When you do, post a link

 

[struth]

Nothing but endless BS which has nothing to do with the laws you cannot post a link to.

i cited the rules for you. it’s amazing you can search in google for your propagandist but can’t seem to type in Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure

I get it…the truth scares you

 

[struth]

I am waiting for you to find them. When you do, post a link

haha i already did! i told you what they said! haha you simply can’t accept facts

 

[Sixties Fan]

i cited the rules for you. it’s amazing you can search in google for your propagandist but can’t seem to type in Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure

I get it…the truth scares you

You citing means nothing. I want the real thing, from the real law, not what you are trying to pass for law.

 

[struth]

You citing means nothing. I want the real thing, from the real law, not what you are trying to pass for law.

I did give you the “real” thing.

Federal Rules are a real thing!

 

[Sixties Fan]

they are huge i’m not posting them on. Go to their website, Ruke 41

RULE, not Ruke 41, is about search warrants ,not affidavit. Two different documents, two different rules.

We are talking about releasing an affidavit to the public. It is only done so, if EVER, once the case is closed.

This is your Rule 41 about search warrants:

Rule 41. Search and Seizure

www.law.cornell.edu

-----------------
This is about affidavits:

Are the affidavits in support of search warrants ever unsealed?​

Yes, but rarely while an investigation is ongoing — such as in the Justice Department’s probe of former President Donald J. Trump. The affidavits normally may be unsealed when there has been an indictment or a law enforcement agency has concluded its investigation and no charges were filed. In 2012, the Times Union successfully petitioned a U.S. magistrate to unseal search warrant affidavits that had been filed in connection with the search of the offices of a lobbyist and former New York GOP chairman — an investigation that did not result in any charges.

Will the affidavit in support of the search warrant used to raid Mar-A-Lago be unsealed?​

Unlikely. Although the Justice Department filed a motion to unseal the warrant and returns — documents that Trump already has — it is expected the government will oppose motions filed by the Times Union and other news organizations to unseal any affidavits. The U.S. magistrate has also allowed the government to file at least part of its arguments for keeping the document sealed as an “ex parte” filing and under seal.

Search warrants are rarely unsealed. Here’s why.

Thousands of federal search warrants, like the one used by the FBI to raid former...

www.timesunion.com

 

[struth]

RULE, not Ruke 41, is about search warrants ,not affidavit. Two different documents, two different rules.

We are talking about releasing an affidavit to the public. It is only done so, if EVER, once the case is closed.

This is your Rule 41 about search warrants:

Rule 41. Search and Seizure

www.law.cornell.edu

-----------------
This is about affidavits:

Are the affidavits in support of search warrants ever unsealed?​

Yes, but rarely while an investigation is ongoing — such as in the Justice Department’s probe of former President Donald J. Trump. The affidavits normally may be unsealed when there has been an indictment or a law enforcement agency has concluded its investigation and no charges were filed. In 2012, the Times Union successfully petitioned a U.S. magistrate to unseal search warrant affidavits that had been filed in connection with the search of the offices of a lobbyist and former New York GOP chairman — an investigation that did not result in any charges.

Will the affidavit in support of the search warrant used to raid Mar-A-Lago be unsealed?​

Unlikely. Although the Justice Department filed a motion to unseal the warrant and returns — documents that Trump already has — it is expected the government will oppose motions filed by the Times Union and other news organizations to unseal any affidavits. The U.S. magistrate has also allowed the government to file at least part of its arguments for keeping the document sealed as an “ex parte” filing and under seal.

Search warrants are rarely unsealed. Here’s why.

Thousands of federal search warrants, like the one used by the FBI to raid former...

www.timesunion.com

omg clearly you didn’t read the rule…i discuss affidavits which are part of the warrant

 

[Sixties Fan]

omg clearly you didn’t read the rule…i discuss affidavits which are part of the warrant

Are you going to give the excuse that you cannot copy and paste because you don't know how?

 

[struth]

Are you going to give the excuse that you cannot copy and paste because you don't know how?

huh? copy and paste? it why? it’s obvious you can’t read apparently..your own links at that