LOIE
Gold Member
- May 11, 2017
- 954
- 325
- 190
You can find and watch the video.Fake News
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
You can find and watch the video.Fake News
There are democratic socialists and then there's the national socialist movement, who are the ones who demonstrated and shouted out all those things. From the Southern Poverty Law Center this is who the NSM is:Nazis.....socialists.....just like the party you vote for.
Videos are real. Event is fake.Fake News
You cite the SPLC? All that shows is how gullible you are.There are democratic socialists and then there's the national socialist movement, who are the ones who demonstrated and shouted out all those things. From the Southern Poverty Law Center this is who the NSM is:
And communism espouses an even more radical equality, but in both cases, it is a lie meant to dupe the masses into letting the uber-wealthy weaponize them against each other. Because, of course, actual real total equality can't even be defined, let alone achieved.Socialism advocates for the equal distribution of wealth across all social classes,
Just clicking on the link you provided I got the message" Dangerous Webpage, Blocked.
There are democratic socialists and then there's the national socialist movement, who are the ones who demonstrated and shouted out all those things. From the Southern Poverty Law Center this is who the NSM is:
The guiding principle of The National Socialist Movement Corporation is fighting for civil rights and self-determination of Whites in America. The Fourteen Words, ‘We must secure the existence of our people and a future for White children,’ best exemplifies the mission of our movement.” – “25 Point Plan,” NSM website.
NSM hit the national news cycle in August 2013. At the time, Hatewatch and the North Dakota-based The Bismarck Tribute reported that the then-61-year-old neo-Nazi Paul Craig Cobb had concocted a scheme to build up his own white ethnostate in the small town of Leith, North Dakota (pop. 19). Cobb’s specific plan to build a “Pioneer Little Europe” originated from a 2001 proposal offered up by H. Michael Barrett. Barrett’s vision, as Hatewatch noted in an article from Aug. 22, 2013, was “to consolidate white residents in existing cities and towns and create all-white enclaves.”
The difference between them and socialists is this: from the website DifferenceBetween.net:
In Nazi Germany which embraced National Socialism, the superior abilities of Aryan citizens were exalted in an effort to appeal to individual pride. Germans wanted to take part in nation-building projects because of the feeling of patriotism, and a sense of pride in being members of the fatherland. In contrast, socialism encourages public participation in national projects by stressing on the importance of belonging to a collective, rather than operating on individual strength.
National Socialism and socialism are two different political ideologies that first emerged in the 18th and 19th centuries respectively. Socialism advocates for the equal distribution of wealth across all social classes, while National Socialism is more focused on building pride in the special abilities of the Aryan race, rather than solving the long-standing problem of inequality.
I personally believe that today's democratic party is the one called "the big tent" party, encouraging people of all types to join and working on the problem of inequality.
Anyone who can’t see there is an effort underfoot to position whites as the “bad” race, whereby anti-white sentiment is not only tolerated but actively promoted, and blacks as poor innocents victimized by white oppression is either a mental patient - or a Biden voter.What is really dangerour is the control you psychotics have of America.
Let's prove it together......Is this what you voted for and claim you oppose racism???
"Kristen Clarke, Joe Biden’s choice to lead the Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division, believes black people are superior to white people because they possess more melanin.
Fox News host Tucker Carlson obtained shocking statements Clarke made in 1994.
“Melanin endows blacks with greater mental, physical, and spiritual abilities — something which cannot be measured by Eurocentric standards.” Kristen Clarke wrote."
“Melanin Endows Blacks with Greater Mental, Physical and Spiritual Abilities” (VIDEO)
Kristen Clarke, Joe Biden’s choice to lead the Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division, believes black people are superior to white people because they possess more melanin. Fox News host Tucker Carlson obtained shocking statements Clarke made in 1994. “Melanin endows blacks with greater ment ...
thespectator.info
Anyone who can’t see there is an effort underfoot to position whites as the “bad” race, whereby anti-white sentiment is not only tolerated but actively promoted, and blacks as poor innocents victimized by white oppression is either a mental patient - or a Biden voter.
Just between the two of us, I am most furious at my fellow Jews who have said - and they have - that we Jews should focus more on combatting racism and less on antisemitism. These are the same Jews who march alongside the BDS supporters screeching “get out Jews!” while patting themselves on the back for being so opposed to bigotry.Don't miss the tell-tale signature of the mental illness: they claim to oppose racism then vote for the party that chooses judges and officials based on skin color.
Mass Psychosis.
Just between the two of us, I am most furious at my fellow Jews who have said - and they have - that we Jews should focus more on combatting racism and less on antisemitism. These are the same Jews who march alongside the BDS supporters screeching “get out Jews!” while patting themselves on the back for being so opposed to bigotry.
Yes, I did see that. How ironic that the liberal ADL, originally created to combat antisemitism, has so bought into the leftist nonsense that it is now downplaying hate crimes and other forms of bigotry against Jews because they aren’t black (for the most part).Did you see this?
Anti-Defamation League sparks backlash after ... - TheBlaze
https://www.theblaze.com › News
— The Anti-Defamation League drew sharp criticism this week after it was discovered the organization changed the definition of "racism" on its ...
The Left.Yes, I did see that. How ironic that the liberal ADL, originally created to combat antisemitism, has so bought into the leftist nonsense that it is now downplaying hate crimes and other forms of bigotry against Jews because they aren’t black (for the most part).
Talk about your self-loathing Jews! The ADL is now tied with Soros.
What is happening is the stuff of nightmares.The Left.
They've taken over.
"Over the past several decades, the progressive Left has successfully fulfilled Antonio Gramsci’s famed admonition of a “long march through the institutions”. In almost every Western country, its adherents now dominate the education system, media, cultural institutions, and financial behemoths."
You sure seem to be hung up on Hitler and the Nazis. That's what you always post. Would you share your personal, individual thoughts about what is wrong with with a government taking care of its people - like with Social Security and Medicare. What is wrong with people getting an equal opportunity to succeed. I have read that lots of the social programs in the U.S. were pretty widely accepted by Republicans and Democrats alike, when they benefitted the white folks. Then some began to object when they were offered to black folks. They believed since it was their country, only they should receive the benefits. Thoughts?(without sending me a hundred links from sources I do not consider truthful, or unbiased)Democrats and Nazi Party of Germany .......one and the same.the
Both have put their own citizens in concentration camps.
And here are your Democrat policies.....same as those Nazis.
Government spending as a percentage of GDP averaged around 40% pre-war. Additionally (at least in the beginning) 80% of the budget was spent on social programs, not the hallmark of an "evil, right wing, capitalist economy." Sign in
-------------------------------------------------------------
Workers Welfare Programs:
In the best passage of Government largess, the Nazi regime fostered a purified liberal concept to enhance the living standard of German citizens across all segments of society. In order to stimulate the spirit of integrity, comradeship and happiness, Adolf Hitler fanned numerous programs and instituted strict rules for officials to carry them in eternal way.
a) Highly Subsidized International vacation trips.
b) Between 1933-1938 Strength through Joy (KDF) movement Organized 134,000 theater and concert events for 32 million people. 2 million people went on cruises and weekend trips and 11 million went on theater trips.
c) Nazis ensured that every citizen had a Radio.
d) 5 day week.
e) Free Public Health.
f) Trade Unions were banned. All workers had to join German labor Front. Strikes for higher wages were banned. People who refused to work were imprisoned. With fall in Inflation, purchasing power increased and wages actually fell.
g) Large factories had to provide rest areas, cafeterias, dressing rooms, even playing fields and swimming pools
h) They also banned "lock outs" for industries. No "reverse strikes"for them either.
Nazi Hitler Economic Social and Political Policies
Click Here for Adolf Hitler and World War 2. What is NAtional SoZIalism. Economic, Social and Political policies of Adolf Hitler and NA...lovkap.blogspot.com
1933-1945: In 1933 Hitler disbands the labor movement and strips Jews of citizenship. Jews, dissidents, and other minorities are put in concentration camps, where they are forced to work or killed outright. The Reich centralizes social programs and education as a means of control. The regime extends health insurance to retirees in 1941, and expands health care and maternity leave the following year. Commanding Heights : Germany | on PBS
During the 12 years of Hitler’s Third Reich, the National Socialists expanded and extended the welfare state to the point where over 17 million German citizens were receiving assistance under the auspices of the National Socialist People's Welfare (NSV) by 1939, an agency that had projected a powerful image of caring and support. Welfare state - Wikipedia
The Nazi rule under Adolf Hitler in the 1930s and 1940s led to an improvement in medical care and old age provision largely financed by high taxes on the wealthy, and theft from Jews and the people of the conquered territories (Aly 2007, 7). The Viability of the European Social Model: The German Welfare State and Labor Market Reform
The Nationalsozialistische Volkswohlfahrt (NSV), meaning "National Socialist People's Welfare", was a social welfare organization during the Third Reich. The NSV was established in 1933,.... The NSV became established as the single Nazi Party welfare organ in May 1933.[1] .... the programme was massively expanded, so that the régime deemed it worthy to be called the "greatest social institution in the world." One method of expansion was to absorb, or in NSDAP parlance coordinate, already existing but non-Nazi charity organizations. NSV was the second largest Nazi group organization by 1939, second only to the German Labor Front.
The National Socialists provided a plethora of social welfare programs under the Nazi concept of Volksgemeinschaft which promoted the collectivity of a “people’s community” where citizens would sacrifice themselves for the greater good. The NSV operated “8,000 day-nurseries” by 1939, and funded holiday homes for mothers, distributed additional food for large families, and was involved with a “wide variety of other facilities.”[4]
The Nazi social welfare provisions included old age insurance, rent supplements, unemployment and disability benefits, old-age homes, interest-free loans for married couples, along with healthcare insurance, which was not decreed mandatory until 1941[5] One of the NSV branches, the Office of Institutional and Special Welfare, was responsible “for travellers’ aid at railway stations; relief for ex-convicts; ‘support’ for re-migrants from abroad; assistance for the physically disabled, hard-of-hearing, deaf, mute, and blind; relief for the elderly, homeless and alcoholics; and the fight against illicit drugs and epidemics.”
These social welfare programs represented a Hitlerian endeavor to lift the community above the individual while promoting the wellbeing of all bona fide citizens. As Hitler told a reporter in 1934, he was determined to give Germans “the highest possible standard of living.” National Socialist People's Welfare - Wikipedia
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hitler’s Beneficiaries: Plunder, Racial War, and the Nazi Welfare State, by Götz Aly,
While underemphasized by modern historians, this socialism was stressed in many contemporaneous accounts of fascism, especially by libertarian thinkers. F.A. Hayek famously dedicated The Road to Serfdom to “the socialists of all parties”—that is, Labourites, Bolsheviks, and National Socialists.
Ludwig von Mises agreed, arguing in 1944 that “both Russia and Germany are right in calling their systems socialist.”
The Nazis themselves regarded the left-right convergence as integral to understanding fascism. Adolf Eichmann viewed National Socialism and communism as “quasi-siblings,” explaining in his memoirs that he “inclined towards the left and emphasized socialist aspects every bit as much as nationalist ones.” As late as 1944, Propaganda Minister Josef Goebbels publicly celebrated “our socialism,” reminding his war-weary subjects that Germany “alone [has] the best social welfare measures.” Contrast this, he advised, with the Jews, who were the very “incarnation of capitalism.”
Using a farrago of previously unpublished statistics, Aly describes in detail a social system larded with benefits —open only to Aryan comrades, naturally.
According to Götz Aly’s Hitler’s Beneficiaries: Plunder, Racial War, and the Nazi Welfare State, most previous treatments of German complicity in genocide overlook a significant aspect of Nazi rule. Aly, a historian at the Fritz Bauer Institut in Frankfurt and the author of more than a dozen books on fascism, urges us to follow the money, arguing that the Nazis maintained popular support—a necessary precondition for the “final solution”—not because of terror or ideological affinity but through a simple system of “plunder,” “bribery,” and a generous welfare state.
To “achieve a truly socialist division of personal assets,” he writes, Hitler implemented a variety of interventionist economic policies, including price and rent controls, exorbitant corporate taxes, frequent “polemics against landlords,” subsidies to German farmers as protection “against the vagaries of weather and the world market,” and harsh taxes on capital gains, which Hitler himself had denounced as “effortless income.”
“The Nazi leadership did not transform the majority of Germans into ideological fanatics who were convinced that they were the master race,” Aly concludes. “Instead it succeeded in making them well-fed parasites.”
Hitler’s Beneficiaries demonstrates a correlation between moral collapse and government largess.
While Aly’s impressive economic history succeeds in reminding readers that Bolshevism and Nazism were, in the words of historian Richard Pipes, both “heresies of socialism,” that service is ultimately overshadowed by a needlessly radical conclusion." Hitler's Handouts
Damn, you are one gullible white woman. Name a social welfare program that specifically excluded blackssocial programs in the U.S. were pretty widely accepted by Republicans and Democrats alike, when they benefitted the white folks. Then some began to object when they were offered to black folks.
You sure seem to be hung up on Hitler and the Nazis. That's what you always post. Would you share your personal, individual thoughts about what is wrong with with a government taking care of its people - like with Social Security and Medicare. What is wrong with people getting an equal opportunity to succeed. I have read that lots of the social programs in the U.S. were pretty widely accepted by Republicans and Democrats alike, when they benefitted the white folks. Then some began to object when they were offered to black folks. They believed since it was their country, only they should receive the benefits. Thoughts?(without sending me a hundred links from sources I do not consider truthful, or unbiased)
I’m so glad you responded to this the way you did. It gives me a chance to respond and explain. Perhaps better wording would have been that some white folks objected when they were convinced by politicians that blacks were benefitting more or even too much from social programs.Damn, you are one gullible white woman. Name a social welfare program that specifically excluded blacks
Do you tell blacks they “seem hung up“ on slavery and Jim Crow?You sure seem to be hung up on Hitler and the Nazis. That's what you always post. Would you share your personal, individual thoughts about what is wrong with with a government taking care of its people - like with Social Security and Medicare. What is wrong with people getting an equal opportunity to succeed. I have read that lots of the social programs in the U.S. were pretty widely accepted by Republicans and Democrats alike, when they benefitted the white folks. Then some began to object when they were offered to black folks. They believed since it was their country, only they should receive the benefits. Thoughts?(without sending me a hundred links from sources I do not consider truthful, or unbiased)