Is The FBI Even Looking For The Leaker?

[rightwinger]

Nobody attacked our Democracy on Jan 6th.
That's a Democrat fabrication fostered by our corrupt media.

Wolf Blitzer starts screaming insurrection and Dummycraps use his op-ed as evidence that it was indeed an insurrection.

Course anyone with half a brain knows that nobody ever tried to overthrow a government with less than 200 unarmed idiots.

Your party tried to overturn a lawful election through legal and illegal means

 

[Papageorgio]

But not in front of a Supreme Court justice's home to intimidate them into changing their position on a case. There's a federal statute about that. Here you go:

18 U.S.C. § 1507 - U.S. Code - Unannotated Title 18. Crimes and Criminal Procedure § 1507. Picketing or parading​

Current as of January 01, 2018 | Updated by FindLaw Staff

Whoever, with the intent of interfering with, obstructing, or impeding the administration of justice, or with the intent of influencing any judge, juror, witness, or court officer, in the discharge of his duty, pickets or parades in or near a building housing a court of the United States, or in or near a building or residence occupied or used by such judge, juror, witness, or court officer, or with such intent uses any sound-truck or similar device or resorts to any other demonstration in or near any such building or residence, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both.

18 U.S.C. § 1507 - U.S. Code Title 18. Crimes and Criminal Procedure § 1507 | FindLaw

U.S. Title 18. Crimes and Criminal Procedure 18 USCA Section 1507. Read the code on FindLaw

codes.findlaw.com

Rightwinger and other lefties don’t care about laws that help their cause. If it hurts their cause, they want laws enforced.

 

[Papageorgio]

Your party tried to overturn a lawful election through legal and illegal means

No they didn’t, the GOP wasn’t behind 1/6, it was a legal protest that became a riot.

 

[d0gbreath]

No they didn’t, the GOP wasn’t behind 1/6, it was a legal protest that became a riot.

Should we poll those in solitary confinement as to their political leans?

 

[Papageorgio]

Should we poll those in solitary confinement as to their political leans?

That proves nothing, the claim is that the GOP tried to overturn the election, they did no such thing. How many are in solitary confinement?

 

[mudwhistle]

Your party tried to overturn a lawful election through legal and illegal means

Your party went even further in 2016.....so STFU about attempts at overturning elections.

Russian Collusion was an attempt to overturn an election.

 

[Nostra]

It's been several weeks and the FBI doesn't know who leaked Alito's brief.

But are they even looking?

I doubt it.....

View attachment 645377View attachment 645378

Truth is...if they were looking they would already know.
No Republican can go a day without the FBI knowing what's in their emails.....but the Supreme Court doesn't seem to know every single communication that took place inside it's hallowed halls.

Who's running this clown-show anyway?

When I was in the DOD we knew that our computers were constantly monitored. I'm sure they do a search of everyone entering or leaving the Supreme Court.....so why is it nobody seems to know who leaked this?

Answer: It could be the FBI or the NSA that leaked it. Why would they rat themselves out?

This only stresses the importance of putting good people in government rather than political hacks. There is no motivation to find the leaker because they wanted it to be leaked. The only thing the FBI is concerned about these days is angry parents.

Garland is too busy saving the planet from man made global warming and terrorizing elementary school moms.

 

[eagle7-31]

Really?
Who cares about the leak?

Nobody will go to jail over it, there is no crime
If they find the person, they will be fired

Wrong.
The problem with these protests is that they're grossly illegal. Under United States Code §1507, it's a crime, punishable with a fine or up to a year in prison, if anyone "pickets or parades" in front of a building or home that judges use with the "intent of interfering with, obstructing, or impeding the administration of justice, or with the intent of influencing any judge[.]"

 

[eagle7-31]

Supreme Court Justices have no more rights than any other citizen

People have a right of peaceful protest……Unless the TRUMP Court takes that right away

The problem with these protests is that they're grossly illegal. Under United States Code §1507, it's a crime, punishable with a fine or up to a year in prison, if anyone "pickets or parades" in front of a building or home that judges use with the "intent of interfering with, obstructing, or impeding the administration of justice, or with the intent of influencing any judge[.]"

 

[WEATHER53]

No
This benefits criminal liberals so no media and no government looking into

 

[Care4all]

But not in front of a Supreme Court justice's home to intimidate them into changing their position on a case. There's a federal statute about that. Here you go:

18 U.S.C. § 1507 - U.S. Code - Unannotated Title 18. Crimes and Criminal Procedure § 1507. Picketing or parading​

Current as of January 01, 2018 | Updated by FindLaw Staff

Whoever, with the intent of interfering with, obstructing, or impeding the administration of justice, or with the intent of influencing any judge, juror, witness, or court officer, in the discharge of his duty, pickets or parades in or near a building housing a court of the United States, or in or near a building or residence occupied or used by such judge, juror, witness, or court officer, or with such intent uses any sound-truck or similar device or resorts to any other demonstration in or near any such building or residence, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both.

18 U.S.C. § 1507 - U.S. Code Title 18. Crimes and Criminal Procedure § 1507 | FindLaw

U.S. Title 18. Crimes and Criminal Procedure 18 USCA Section 1507. Read the code on FindLaw

codes.findlaw.com

It also breaks Virginia state law as well! Has it been stopped yet? According to the law you posted, it seems like it should be, imo.

 

[Nostra]

Supreme Court Justices have no more rights than any other citizen

People have a right of peaceful protest……Unless the TRUMP Court takes that right away

Protesting outside a SC Justice's home is a federal crime, Dumbass.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

It's been several weeks and the FBI doesn't know who leaked Alito's brief.

But are they even looking?

I doubt it.....

View attachment 645377View attachment 645378

Truth is...if they were looking they would already know.
No Republican can go a day without the FBI knowing what's in their emails.....but the Supreme Court doesn't seem to know every single communication that took place inside it's hallowed halls.

Who's running this clown-show anyway?

When I was in the DOD we knew that our computers were constantly monitored. I'm sure they do a search of everyone entering or leaving the Supreme Court.....so why is it nobody seems to know who leaked this?

Answer: It could be the FBI or the NSA that leaked it. Why would they rat themselves out?

This only stresses the importance of putting good people in government rather than political hacks. There is no motivation to find the leaker because they wanted it to be leaked. The only thing the FBI is concerned about these days is angry parents.

It's not a crime. They are also not looking for a lot of other people who didn't commit crimes.

 

[busybee01]

It's been several weeks and the FBI doesn't know who leaked Alito's brief.

But are they even looking?

I doubt it.....

View attachment 645377View attachment 645378

Truth is...if they were looking they would already know.
No Republican can go a day without the FBI knowing what's in their emails.....but the Supreme Court doesn't seem to know every single communication that took place inside it's hallowed halls.

Who's running this clown-show anyway?

When I was in the DOD we knew that our computers were constantly monitored. I'm sure they do a search of everyone entering or leaving the Supreme Court.....so why is it nobody seems to know who leaked this?

Answer: It could be the FBI or the NSA that leaked it. Why would they rat themselves out?

This only stresses the importance of putting good people in government rather than political hacks. There is no motivation to find the leaker because they wanted it to be leaked. The only thing the FBI is concerned about these days is angry parents.

The fact is that no crime has been committed. The FBI has no business investigating. It is also very clear that the leaker was from the fascist wing of the Supreme Court. This is pretty much confirmed as Republicans are no longer demanding the Justice behind the leak resign. Thewy know it is a member of the fascist wing.

The FBI should be investigating people who make threats to school boards. Many of these people are not parents.

 

[busybee01]

They don't want to find them.

They know who had access to the information. They know where the information was obtained from. The information came from a federal location. The list is short.

Most likely scenario is it was intentional so they could use the fallout as a weapon against Republicans in an attempt to shine a bad light on them as we near midterms and democrats have to take the heat off themselves.

What federal crime was committed?

 

[busybee01]

They don't want to find them.

They know who had access to the information. They know where the information was obtained from. The information came from a federal location. The list is short.

Most likely scenario is it was intentional so they could use the fallout as a weapon against Republicans in an attempt to shine a bad light on them as we near midterms and democrats have to take the heat off themselves.

Most likely scenario is that it was leaked by a member of the fascist right wing.

 

[SweetTea]

A month from now, it will be moot anyway once SCOTUS formally releases it findings

Who cares?

The bigger issue is the finding itself NOT the leak

Not even close. Even if Roe v Wade is overturned, it pales in comparison to the damage done to the highest court in the land if leaking becomes commonplace on every controversial issue.

 

[AMart]

Alito said in his ruling that Americans don't have a right to privacy. So the supreme court should live by that rule.

So I can install web cams where you live and watch what you do?

 

[SweetTea]

Supreme Court Justices have no more rights than any other citizen

People have a right of peaceful protest……Unless the TRUMP Court takes that right away

WRONG.

Protesting in front of a judge’s home regarding a potential ruling is clearly against the law.

 

[AMart]

Most likely scenario is that it was leaked by a member of the fascist right wing.

FBI would have nabbed them by now. Leftists get a pass.