I recall being suspicious of this at the time.

As you stated up thread Biden's DOJ was in charge at the time.

Why not pursue a criminal to the end?

I know you don't have an answer.
They did. And the end was following policy of not prosecuting a sitting president, once the fat rapist was elected.


And then people with very smooth brains tried to conflate that into Trump's innocence, like you are doing now.

Because you couldn't form an actual legal defense if your life depended on it.
 
They did. And the end was following policy of not prosecuting a sitting president, once the fat rapist was elected.
Yea full circle.

So your contention is you can commit any crime and if you're elected President you can't be prosecuted.

Can you show the case law or precedent for that?
 
I know cult, stupid ....you're quite witty.

Nothing to substantiate your legal theory though.
Hahaha

That you couldn't describe if your life depended on it.

You're just babbling and self soothing. Take a hike, weirdo.
 
They did. And the end was following policy of not prosecuting a sitting president, once the fat rapist was elected.


And then people with very smooth brains tried to conflate that into Trump's innocence, like you are doing now.

Because you couldn't form an actual legal defense if your life depended on it.
i-mwxGH2G-M.jpg


These are your buddies.
Don't you have a Tesla to set on fire or a Jew to beat up or an illegal immigrant to protect from the law or something?
 
If he were apply for a job as a custodian with his history of sexual assaults, stealing money from a charity, orchestrating a subversion of the Constitution, refusing to comply with a subpoena for stolen classified docs, no one in their right mind would hire him.
Lol I read that thinking it was about the Clintons, who took all the money their "foundation" collected for Haiti, helped themselves to USAID money and took 8 million out of USAID to have a nice wedding and home for their daughter.
We are an ATM to the government...
 

Trump’s team skips FBI background checks for some Cabinet picks​

President-elect Donald Trump’s transition team is bypassing traditional FBI background checks for at least some of his Cabinet picks while using private companies to conduct vetting of potential candidates for administration jobs, people close to the transition planning say.

Trump and his allies believe the FBI system is slow and plagued with issues that could stymie the president-elect’s plan to quickly begin the work of implementing his agenda, people briefed on the plans said. Critics say the intrusive background checks sometimes turn up embarrassing information used to inflict political damage.


Given Don's prior experience during trump 1.0 it wasn't surprising he'd be reluctant to allow his picks to be exposed to FBI scrutiny.

Officials rejected Jared Kushner for top secret security clearance, but were overruled​

Kushner's was one of at least 30 cases in which Kline overruled career security experts and approved a top-secret clearance for incoming Trump officials despite unfavorable information, the two sources said.

All of which puts this in the proper perspective.

Border czar Tom Homan didn’t receive normal background check during bribery probe

In early January, several days before Donald Trump’s inauguration, a Justice Department lawyer passed an envelope across a wide desk to a top Trump transition official. Enclosed was a bombshell, typed up in a one-page summary, according to two people briefed on the meeting.

As he read the contents of the envelope, the official, Emil Bove (
the guy who would later tell DoJ subordinates to ignore court orders), closed his eyes and grimaced, according to the people, who requested anonymity to discuss a sensitive case. It revealed that Tom Homan — at that time, a frequent companion of Trump’s on the campaign trail who had publicly boasted he would be joining Trump’s administration to lead his immigrant deportation strategy — was the subject of an ongoing bribery investigation. Undercover FBI agents posing as private contractors had recorded him accepting $50,000 in cash in exchange for what they believed was Homan’s vow to help get border enforcement contracts in the new Trump administration.

A small group of career lawyers at the Justice Department felt an urgency to share this sensitive information with the president-elect’s team as soon as possible, hoping to head off potential embarrassment and a security clearance problem before Trump picked his future Cabinet and top appointees.


Heck, when you pick a nominee to be AG who was investigated for sex trafficking (wait..WHAT!), and a nominee for border czar who was investigated for taking a bribe (wait...WHAT!), the last thing you want is to have those nominees go through the normal background check process.

After all, loyalists like Pam and Kash had yet to be installed in key DoJ posts. Meaning that for the folks doing a check on Homan, the tape of him taking $50K in cash was..........let's just say it was "problematic."

White House spokesperson Karoline Leavitt told reporters at a White House briefing that “Mr. Homan never took the $50,000 that you’re referring to” despite an internal DOJ document stating that he did.

"These aren't the drones you're looking for, move along," says Karoline.

Do not post in red. Thank you kindly!

--TK
Actually, it's not 2026. Very warm welcome to the Orwell world 1984! :)

👉 Just imagine a Massive Television Screen Showing a Newsroom...

1984newsroom.webp


What it looks like: A giant LED screen broadcasting a bustling newsroom with anchors, scrolling tickers, and split‑screen graphics. Behind the anchors are silhouettes of corporate logos (e.g., a stylized “C” for Comcast, a “D” for Disney).

Why it’s there: Mainstream media remains a central conduit for political information, shaping narratives, setting agendas, and sometimes reflecting ownership interests. The screen also represents the rise of 24‑hour news cycles and the pressure to generate clicks.

Now -----> Wealthy Trump admin vs. wealthy US media

Enjoy watching! lol. :)
 
And Democrats.

The left has taken an underdog position ever since the 60's. When there really were organized leftie terrorists, you remember the SLA, and over in Europe they had the Red Brigades... These days, every Democrat is like a little automaton, an individual version of a bad attitude. The strange morality that justifies getting in everyone's face, which in academic circles they call "social engineering". Every Democrat thinks they're part of a forward looking social movement that's changing the world. The reality seems to be quite different, every fraudulent rock that gets turned over seems to have a Democrat behind it.
 
In the mind of a MAGAt cultist. A normal human sees there was no closure.

But you and your cult are not normal.
What's not normal is you cultist hiding, and ignoring, and running away from everything the Obama/Biden family were alledged to have criminally done over time (Ukraine, Hunter lap top, Burisma, Cocaine in the whitehouse, Biden's daughters diary, Afghanistan retreat that got 13 soldier's killed, ridiculous covid lock downs, ridiculous covid requirements, attacking natural immunity with no evidence it was allegedly dangerous, pure blatant lawfare, allegedly peaceful riots, embolding criminals, gang culture promotion, defending criminal acts and elements, making fools of yourselves at state of the union adresses, open borders, the promotion of
replacement theory, men in women's private spaces, men hurting women physically in their own sport's, trying to erase women because you can't define what a woman is, questioning the definition of is, trying to promote trans-female pregnancy as if it is a male having babies, men marrying men as if man laying with mankind is normal, electing communism/socialist into positions of power, creating and promoting dependency on a grand scale, making false promises for votes, using and creating fake news in hopes to constantly fool the people into thinking they are powerless against you, indoctronating the children by catching them young and in a weak position in order to groom them, attacking parent's over their love for their children to not be indoctronated by radicals, using government power to force the changes against the people's will, disrespecting our flag, our veteran's, and allowing the infiltration of our government to go unchecked), and on and on it goes but the conservative is the cultist eh ??? You people are using Trump as a distraction for all of the above to be protected and preserved.

You need your damned heads examined is what you and berg need.
 
Last edited:
i-mwxGH2G-M.jpg


These are your buddies.
Don't you have a Tesla to set on fire or a Jew to beat up or an illegal immigrant to protect from the law or something?
If those people look normal to a Democrat, then Houston we have a serious problem.
 
15th post
Back
Top Bottom