Is Separation of Church and State Only for Republicans?

None of what you said has anything to do with religion. Try again.

Wrong.
All ethical standards you try to impose upon others, that are not defensive, ARE based on religious traditions.
Haircuts, shaving, wearing hats outside, taking hats off inside, outlawing adultery, outlawing prostitution, being closed on Sunday, etc., are all based on religious traditions.

The reality is humans evolved from primates, and there is not a single monogamous primate.
So then likely marriage and monogamy are artificial religious constructs.
Clearly Prohibition did not even try to disguise its religious origins, but the War on Drugs is no less religion based.
 
A swing and a miss, why not include the lack of mining on the Moon to your ridiculous list?

The examples I gave were where government in the US abuses power to dictate things people are forced to do or not do, based on some artificial desire by others, and not based on the only legal basis, which is defense against harm from others.

The War on Drugs is a good example, because about half those incarcerated are victimless crimes like that which are inherently illegal to incarcerate. The War on Drugs is just the current reincarnation of the mistaken Prohibition of Alcohol. Which obviously is religion motivated.
 
Again, what laws has Biden made to make the state become the official religious leader of the nation, and what religion was officially made the state religion?
 
The examples I gave were where government in the US abuses power to dictate things people are forced to do or not do, based on some artificial desire by others, and not based on the only legal basis, which is defense against harm from others.

The War on Drugs is a good example, because about half those incarcerated are victimless crimes like that which are inherently illegal to incarcerate. The War on Drugs is just the current reincarnation of the mistaken Prohibition of Alcohol. Which obviously is religion motivated.
Which has nothing to do with the separation of church and state. It does have something to do with Biden...
 

.


"Is Separation of Church and State Only for Republicans?"​


Yes, of necessity, because for the demoncrats, their church IS the state.

Jeez, I vividly remember when demoncrats were the anti-government party!




.
 
I've proven who came up with separation of church and state many times; you're too stupid to decide wh is and who isn't anything, dumbass. Go smoke some more meth and rape a stray dog or something freak.


... just for starters. Baptists led the way on separation of church and state, ,unique in that regard, which was why Thomas Jefferson was so concerned with their opinions as President. It is key to their belief in free will and their rejection of baptizing infants and children.


Helwys was killed for his advocacy of separation of church and state, while all Moonglow will die from is fentanyl or some venereal disease.

When an individual decides drugs or anonymous sex is too risky or harmful to them, that is not religion.
But when individuals decide drugs or anonymous sex is wrong for others, that IS religion based.
 
Which has nothing to do with the separation of church and state. It does have something to do with Biden...

Wrong.
Any use of force by government to dictate what others must do or not do, that is not based on the need to defend the rights of others, is ALWAYS and ONLY based on religion.
The fact most Christian and Muslim religions are similar because they evolved from Judaism, does not make them any more right or universal.
Any law not based on defense of individual rights, can only be based on a religious belief.
Separation of church and state means you can't have any law that proscribes what others should or should not do, except to prevent what harms others who want gov to defend them from that harm.
 
The modern concept of "separation of church/state" is an invention by a liberal Supreme Court in the late 40's. The intent was allegedly to curtail the establishment of religious based private schools at the time. The majority opinion was written by a former KKK member, Justice Black, who was appointed by FDR. There is no Constitutional basis for church/state but mostly democrat administrations expanded the issue to the point where a local municipality would be threatened with a lawsuit if they dared to put a Christmas tree on public property or a kid who dared to carry a Bible to school would be threatened with expulsion. The hypocrisy is stunning when the president of the United States gives a speech in a Baptist church.
 
Wow, all of these democrats must have suddenly had an epiphany, and are now in agreement that it's OK for government to deal with religion, just as long as they are not establishing a national religion!
 
Does not matter if most religions get preferential treatment, but is illegal if even one is abused.
And clearly Biden allows the FAA to illegally abuse Muslim plane passengers.

Got anything to back up your bullshit about Biden allowing the FAA to illegally abuse Muslim plane passengers? BTW, Trump was the one who first started that.
 

Forum List

Back
Top