Is it necessary to legalize marriages with dogs?

[ABikerSailor]

It's still a big question whether people belong to the same species. The biological definition of a species is when a couple can have offspring that can also have offspring. This does not apply to people, in many cases it is impossible or possible only with the help of immunosuppressants. On the other hand, dog and fox sex is within the species

Apparently, you don't know much about biology either.

 

[Tumblin Tumbleweed]

I think this is a good idea, because sex between dogs and people happens more often than sex between same-sex people. If you are against the legalization of marriages with dogs, then argue this: how is marriage with a dog different from same-sex marriage.
If you support the legalization of dog marriages, do you consider it necessary to promote such marriages among schoolchildren?

Not playing your false equivalence psycho reindeer game.

 

[rupol2000]

Just out of curiosity, why would you use link written in Russian on a site called USMessageboard? Most on here only read English. Maybe you did it because you think people will take you at your word because they can't read Russian? Sorry dude, but your Troll Fu needs some work. And no, with thoughts as bat shit crazy as I've seen you post on here, I don't think anyone is crazy/stupid/weird enough to take you at your word.

I'm just too lazy to look for materials in English. There's a photo there, I hope you're not blind? And you can use a translator.

 

[rupol2000]

Apparently, you don't know much about biology either.

Apparently you can say any shit that no one is interested in, it's legal in the USA

 

[ABikerSailor]

I'm just too lazy to look for materials in English. There's a photo there, I hope you're not blind? And you can use a translator.

Maybe the reason your Troll Fu sucks so bad is because you're lazy. I might be willing to use a translator program if there was a subject that interested me and the person posting it couldn't find an English equivalent and told me so in advance. But a post about bestiality from an obviously addled mind? Sorry, not interested.

 

[rupol2000]

Apparently, you don't know much about biology either.

And once again for the particularly stupid: by definition of a biological species, people do not belong to the same species.

 

[rupol2000]

Maybe the reason your Troll Fu sucks so bad is because you're lazy. I might be willing to use a translator program if there was a subject that interested me and the person posting it couldn't find an English equivalent and told me so in advance. But a post about bestiality from an obviously addled mind? Sorry, not interested.

**** off, I'm sick of your stupidity. Are you a ******?

 

[ABikerSailor]

Apparently you can say any shit that no one is interested in, it's legal in the USA

Of course biology is legal in the USA (and that is what I had said you apparently don't know very much about).

As far as bestiality? It is illegal in all but 4 states, but not having a law against it doesn't necessarily make it legal (they probably didn't write laws for it as they didn't think people would be that desperate or stupid), but you still CAN be prosecuted for animal abuse if caught having sex with them in those states where they didn't outright outlaw it.

All the US states where bestiality is still legal

Most people would be shocked to find that bestiality is legal in four US states. Wyoming, New Mexico, Hawaii, and West Virginia do not have laws prohibiting the sexual assault of animals. In those states, sexual assault against an animal can be prosecuted as animal abuse but there is no law...

www.indy100.com

Most people would be shocked to find that bestiality is legal in four US states. Wyoming, New Mexico, Hawaii, and West Virginia do not have laws prohibiting the sexual assault of animals.

In those states, sexual assault against an animal can be prosecuted as animal abuse but there is no law outright addressing it. For the other 46 states, the seriousness of the crime varies. Some see it as a misdemeanor while others classify it as a felony.

 

[TheProgressivePatriot]

I think this is a good idea, because sex between dogs and people happens more often than sex between same-sex people. If you are against the legalization of marriages with dogs, then argue this: how is marriage with a dog different from same-sex marriage.
If you support the legalization of dog marriages, do you consider it necessary to promote such marriages among schoolchildren?

This is not satire. It is just plain stupid!

 

[ABikerSailor]

And once again for the particularly stupid: by definition of a biological species, people do not belong to the same species.

Got something to back up your bullshit? People can give organs, blood, or breed with other humans not of their ethnicity, because they belong to the same species. Guess you are seriously deficient in your knowledge of biology.

 

[rupol2000]

if caught having sex with them in those states where they didn't outright outlaw it.

That is, this child raped by a dog will be prosecuted under US laws?

 

[TheProgressivePatriot]

Almost all the psychiatrists I knew were mentally ill people, and no one knows what psychiatry is and what it is based on. Isn't it a mental illness to consider sex with men and dogs the norm?

Yup! You do strike me as someonewho knows a lot of psychiatrists

 

[ABikerSailor]

**** off, I'm sick of your stupidity. Are you a ******?

This is how you deal with deviant trolls people..........simply speak to them calmly, with facts and links to back it up, and eventually they will be the ones to lose their shit like rupol2000 just did. I didn't have to cuss or call them names, just tell them why their idiotic ideas were so stupid, and they finally lost their shit when they thought they could troll me into losing mine. Just food for thought. Reasonably refuting a troll's bullshit with facts makes them crazy and lose their cool.

 

[rupol2000]

Most people would be shocked to find that bestiality is legal in four US states. Wyoming, New Mexico, Hawaii, and West Virginia do not have laws prohibiting the sexual assault of animals.

In those states, sexual assault against an animal can be prosecuted as animal abuse but there is no law outright addressing it. For the other 46 states, the seriousness of the crime varies. Some see it as a misdemeanor while others classify it as a felony.

We need to make it easier: ban any perversions everywhere. Perverts should be severely punished, as for ****** rapists, they should be executed

 

[ABikerSailor]

That is, this child raped by a dog will be prosecuted under US laws?

If a child was raped by a dog, it would be put down, not given a trial, because our legal system doesn't make allowances for animals. Or, are you also advocating making animals have the same rights as citizens in this country? Never gonna happen by the way, and you would have to do that before you could make a case to allow humans and animals to marry.

 

[rupol2000]

Yup! You do strike me as someonewho knows a lot of psychiatrists

In left-wing countries, like mine, we are forced to undergo a psychiatric examination during conscription, a medical examination for work, for the right to drive a car, for the right of a hunter to buy a shotgun, and so on. Everyone knows psychiatrists.

 

[bodecea]

I think this is a good idea, because sex between dogs and people happens more often than sex between same-sex people. If you are against the legalization of marriages with dogs, then argue this: how is marriage with a dog different from same-sex marriage.
If you support the legalization of dog marriages, do you consider it necessary to promote such marriages among schoolchildren?

If you cannot distinguish between adult humans that can give con-sent and animals and children that cannot, you should stay away from animals and children.

 

[ABikerSailor]

In left-wing countries, like mine, we are forced to undergo a psychiatric examination during conscription, a medical examination for work, for the right to drive a car, for the right of a hunter to buy a shotgun, and so on. Everyone knows psychiatrists.

Here in America, we don't have as many bat shit crazy people as yours apparently does. No, we don't require a mental exam to buy a gun (although in some cases, maybe it would have been helpful), to drive a car, etc. (which means and so on). While many people in this country do know and see psychiatrists, it's more for issues they have (or think) they have, and they aren't required by our government to do so for daily life. Military enlistment doesn't really require one, but for some of the special programs or duties a military person might wish to join or do, some require it.

 

[rupol2000]

In general, natural stupidity and autism are essentially mental illnesses. If a person believes that the Yahweh created the world in 7 days, or that there may be some kind of "same-sex marriage", this is also a question of psychiatrists. And if our psychiatrists were not mentally ill themselves, they would diagnose at least 50% of the population, at least all leftists.

 

[rupol2000]

If you cannot distinguish between adult humans that can give con-sent and animals and children that cannot, you should stay away from animals and children.

OK, I agreed with this argument. But on the other hand, the content of the dog does not require the con-sent of the dog. What is the legal definition of marriage in the United States?