Negotiations Have Ended

Hezbollah was created because of Israelis invasion in Southern Lebadon in 1982 and was caused by it.


Neither Iran, nor Iraq attacked USA. And your insinuations about WMD abd NYC is nothing about illegal pretext to attack peaceful (but oil-rich) states.


Yep, no of what you said is aggression. America produced much more enriched Uranium and American proxies killed much more Iranians.

We'll see. If they want nukes - they will get them.
The ayatillahs can't even produce enough electricity to keep the lights on, or to provide water for its cities or maintain order in its streets without killing tens of thousands of Iranian citizens, so there is clearly no rational basis for expressing confidence in their ability to overcome American opposition to their nuclear weapons program.
 
C'mon, just make a little research.
BULL. Al-Quada did not get here on their own. Iraq was very friendly sponsor of them.

America was the main sponsor of Al-Quada. And most of attackers were Sauidis.
America does not go around chanting death trying to destroy other countries.
First of all you do chant those songs (like "When they drop the atomic bomb". Second you actually destroying other countries.

America acts when there is no other choice and all effects for peaceful negotiation have failed.
Bla-bla-bla. You attack other countries every time you see opportunity.

America has no proxies.
America has a lot of proxies, including pretty disgusting set of terroristic organisations.

If they get nukes, we nuke them, then we bust the ass of whoever gave them to them.
You nuke Iran - Iran nuke you. And before you got yourself prepared to nuke Russia - Russia nuke you first.

Iran shall have no nukes, period.
As I said - we'll see. If they want nukes - they will have nukes. May be, even this summer.
 
The ayatillahs can't even produce enough electricity to keep the lights on, or to provide water for its cities or maintain order in its streets without killing tens of thousands of Iranian citizens, so there is clearly no rational basis for expressing confidence in their ability to overcome American opposition to their nuclear weapons program.
There is a popular joke here in Russia:
"- Dad, the price of vodka is scyrocketing! Will you drink less?
- No, son. You'll eat less."

Same is situation with nukes. If there is decision to make nukes - Iran will make nukes, doesn't matter what happened with the rest of population. And, what is more important, Iran is able to buy nukes from Russia, China or North Korea.
 
There is a popular joke here in Russia:
"- Dad, the price of vodka is scyrocketing! Will you drink less?
- No, son. You'll eat less."

Same is situation with nukes. If there is decision to make nukes - Iran will make nukes, doesn't matter what happened with the rest of population. And, what is more important, Iran is able to buy nukes from Russia, China or North Korea.
The ayatollahs have brought Iran to its knees with their insane desire to acquire nukes.

Keep in mind this is the gang that can't shoot straight; they can't even turn on the lights or produce a glass of water, and if they or you had any brains at all, it would be clear to you that the very fact the ayatollahs have chosen to attack Israel and the US, two nuclear powers, is proof that acquiring nukes down not make you safe.
 
In case you missed it, Iran's mullahs have everyone chanting "Death to America" calling us the "Great Satan".
Oh, noes, they called us bad names? I heard they also said Our Mamas wear Army Shoes!!!

Now is the time for regime change in Iran. Were you okay with regime change in Libya?
No, actually, I wasn't. I thought it was one of the dumber things Obama did. (Although the French were the main instigators.)

Most of the Gulf is okay with Israel, hence the Abraham Accords.
You mean most of their corrupt, unelected governments sold out for some US goodies. But every one of them have condemned what the Zionists are doing in Gaza.
Iran and their terrorist network, Hamas, Houthis, and Hezbollah need to be eliminated, and without support from Iran they are gone. Imagine their threats if they had nuclear weapons.

Again, we've been involved in these pissant fights in the ME for 40 years now. Victory is always just over the next hill.

I'm not a fan of Israel either.
Then stop asking 'How high" every time they say "Jump".
 
America was the main sponsor of Al-Quada. And most of attackers were Sauidis.
First of all you do chant those songs (like "When they drop the atomic bomb". Second you actually destroying other countries.
Bla-bla-bla. You attack other countries every time you see opportunity.
You Russians are obviously subject to a lot of misinformation and anti-America propaganda. Not at all surprising.

America has a lot of proxies, including pretty disgusting set of terroristic organisations.
And not unsurprisingly, you just cannot even name a single one of them.

You nuke Iran - Iran nuke you.
If we nuke Iran, there will be no Iran left.

And before you got yourself prepared to nuke Russia - Russia nuke you first.
Sure you will.

As I said - we'll see. If they want nukes - they will have nukes. May be, even this summer.
China has called off all attempts to resupply Iran. If Putin tries to resupply Iran to extend this war, all I can say is to kiss your moscowian ass goodbye.
 
The ayatollahs have brought Iran to its knees with their insane desire to acquire nukes.
First of all, it were ayatollahs who were against acquiring nukes. Second, desire to acquire nukes is pretty sane and understandable. And secular part of Irainian society is much more pro-nuclear.

Keep in mind this is the gang that can't shoot straight; they can't even turn on the lights or produce a glass of water, and if they or you had any brains at all, it would be clear to you that the very fact the ayatollahs have chosen to attack Israel and the US, two nuclear powers, is proof that acquiring nukes down not make you safe.
It's self-defense, and anybody would fight back when attacked on his own land, whatever nuclear or non-nuclear forces attacked him. And, giving the argument pro-sanity - they are allied with at least two nuclear powers - Russia and China, who are stronger than the USA and Israel.

For my secular and atheistic mindset the logic of Iranian ayatollahs is more justified, clear, rational and predictable than the logic of Zionists and American Evangelists & Satanists.
 
anybody would fight back when attacked on his own land,
No one would be attacking Iran if they were not a state sponsor of global terrorism, holding oil hostage belonging to other countries while promising nuclear death to the West if they do not succumb. Iran only has itself to blame.

Russia and China, who are stronger than the USA and Israel.
In your pipe dreams. You just keep smoking on that dog poo. The USA eats China for breakfast and craps out Russia for dinner.

China and Russia combined have less than half the budget the USA has and we build by far the best weapons.

Screen Shot 2026-04-16 at 1.01.07 AM.webp


The USA spends 6.6X as much as Russia on military with it only being half as much our GDP, showing that Russia is weak. Then, you have that ass-kicking in Ukraine to deal with as well.

:auiqs.jpg:
 
You Russians are obviously subject to a lot of misinformation and anti-America propaganda. Not at all surprising.
As a matter of fact, the worst (the best) examples kf anti-American propaganda I saw - are you, guys. Especially your political leaders. While official Russian propaganda emphasize the possibility of peaceful coexistence and goodwill, you are living prove that the said coexistence is hardly possible.
And not unsurprisingly, you just cannot even name a single one of them.
I can name a lot. Taliban in Afghanistan, Al Kaeda, Army of Liberation of Kosovo, Ukrainian GUR are only few of them.

If we nuke Iran, there will be no Iran left.
There are 1250 cities in Iran, and many of them needs more than one nuke to be destroyed. And US have only 1500 active nukes on duty. It's not enough even to destroy all soft targets (like cities) say nothing about hardened targets like underground facilities.

China has called off all attempts to resupply Iran.
It is simply not true. China is openly and officially supplying Iran with "humanitarian aid" and not that openly (but not very secretly) supply with weapons and equipment.

If Putin tries to resupply Iran to extend this war, all I can say is to kiss your moscowian ass goodbye.
And what can you do about it? More sanctions? America is more interested in peace with Russia than Russia is interested in peace with America, because Russia can kill much more Americans and have better chances to win a nuclear war against the USA.
 
No one would be attacking Iran if they were not a state sponsor of global terrorism, holding oil hostage belonging to other countries while promising nuclear death to the West if they do not succumb. Iran only has itself to blame.
You attacked Iran before they became the "sponsor of terrorism". Actually, it was rule of American's puppet, that forced Iranians to start the Revolution and it was direct aggresive war started by your another puppets that forced Iran to play active foreign policy, while they, as almost anyone else, would prefer to mind their own business.

In your pipe dreams. You just keep smoking on that dog poo. The USA eats China for breakfast and craps out Russia for dinner.
The only thing that USA will eat for breakfast will be Chinese cum, and the only thing they will craps out for long time - will be Russian cum. You're deeply f#cked, guys, and don't even release what night of love is expected to happen.

China and Russia combined have less than half the budget the USA has and we build by far the best weapons.

View attachment 1244635

The USA spends 6.6X as much as Russia on military with it only being half as much our GDP, showing that Russia is weak. Then, you have that ass-kicking in Ukraine to deal with as well.

:auiqs.jpg:
C'mon. We are not fighting by throwing dollars packs into each other. And, talking about actual modern war fighting capabilities Russia is a way stronger than USA.
 
Oh, noes, they called us bad names? I heard they also said Our Mamas wear Army Shoes!!!
Point being, Iran wants us dead. Not funny.
No, actually, I wasn't. I thought it was one of the dumber things Obama did. (Although the French were the main instigators.)
Ok, Obama and Hillary thought getting rid of Qadaffi was a good thing (it was) and made it happen. Trump thinks getting rid of Iran's nuclear and missile programs are a good thing (it is) and is making it happen.
You mean most of their corrupt, unelected governments sold out for some US goodies. But every one of them have condemned what the Zionists are doing in Gaza.
The "root cause" of the Gaza mess is Hamas, and the root cause of Hamas is Iran. Without Iran Hamas and Hezbollah are much less problematic.
Again, we've been involved in these pissant fights in the ME for 40 years now. Victory is always just over the next hill.
We get involved when vicious dictators' regimes get too threatening, Qadaffi, Saddam, Kohmeini, all gone. There is no "victory" just peaceful coexistence with us and Israel. If Iran got nukes and ICBMs it would not be a pissant fight, but very serious business.
Then stop asking 'How high" every time they say "Jump".
The enemy of my enemy...
 
The "first blood" was many (47) years ago. Iran went thru the JCPOA since 2015 and ended up on the verge of nuclear weapons and ICBM delivery systems. Trump made the national security decision that the lead terrorist state cannot have nuclear weapons. You can call it "first blood", but its the US being a good cop when the rest of the world is hiding under their beds praying.

Except they didn't get a bomb. If Iran wanted a bomb, they'd have gotten a bomb by now. It's the cutting edge technology of 1945.

The US isn't being a good cop. It's being the global equivalent of Darren Chauvin.


Point being, Iran wants us dead. Not funny.

Sure it is. watching you guys piss yourselves on command because Cheeto Hitler says so is hilarious.

Watching us make eternal enemies by levelling girls' schools, no so much.


Ok, Obama and Hillary thought getting rid of Qadaffi was a good thing (it was) and made it happen. Trump thinks getting rid of Iran's nuclear and missile programs are a good thing (it is) and is making it happen.

No, getting rid of Qadaffi was not a good thing, the country collapsed into chaos and it's oil has largely gone off the global markets.

The "root cause" of the Gaza mess is Hamas, and the root cause of Hamas is Iran. Without Iran Hamas and Hezbollah are much less problematic.
No, the root cause of Hamas and Gaza are a bunch of Jewish Squatters from Europe stealing someone else's land and treating them like dirt.


We get involved when vicious dictators' regimes get too threatening, Qadaffi, Saddam, Kohmeini, all gone. There is no "victory" just peaceful coexistence with us and Israel. If Iran got nukes and ICBMs it would not be a pissant fight, but very serious business.

Except none of those things have brought us peace, have they? We got rid of Saddam, and spent 20 years trying to pacify Iraq. We spend 20 years in Afghanistan, only to put the Taliban back into power.

The enemy of my enemy...
Except Iran is not our enemy, other than we making it ours at Zionist institigation.
 
The USA spends 6.6X as much as Russia on military
You still haven't figured out that this is because of a collusion between arms manufacturers and politicians, which drives up the prices of weapons purchased by the Pentagon to several times their actual value.
I remember scenes from the ’80s when a senator would hold up a regular light bulb purchased by the Pentagon for $20 or a toilet seat for $100. Things have only gotten worse. So there’s no need to be proud of the U.S. military budget—it should be ashamed of.
 
Point being, Iran wants us dead. Not funny.
More than half of the world, including Russia, wants you dead. It's not because they hate who you are, your culture, language, civilisation, etc... They hate you for what are you doing (basically you are killing them, interfering with their inner politics, robbering them, commiting numerous acts of unprovoked and illegal aggressions, supporting international terrorism and so on).
And if you don't do something extremely provocative, most of you can peacefully coexist with them. Absolute majority of Americans are nice people. The problem is with your ruling regime (which is, quite possible, isn't actually "your", but it is definitely up to you to decide).

Ok, Obama and Hillary thought getting rid of Qadaffi was a good thing (it was) and made it happen. Trump thinks getting rid of Iran's nuclear and missile programs are a good thing (it is) and is making it happen.
And both of them were wrong. I don't know for whom it was good, but it was definitely bad both for America and Africa/Middle East. As a rational thinking person I prefer to think, that there is may be evil, but rationally thinking, backroom group, who actually, some way, benefited from all this mess. But, may be, it's just my wishful-thinking and there is no evil wizards somewhere behind the scene, just stupidity and incompetence of real decision-makers.

The "root cause" of the Gaza mess is Hamas, and the root cause of Hamas is Iran. Without Iran Hamas and Hezbollah are much less problematic.
Actually, it was Israel's actions that raised both Hamas and Hezbollah.

We get involved when vicious dictators' regimes get too threatening, Qadaffi, Saddam, Kohmeini, all gone. There is no "victory" just peaceful coexistence with us and Israel. If Iran got nukes and ICBMs it would not be a pissant fight, but very serious business.
If you destroyed the previous world order, you shouldn't be surprised that all players are going to regime "might is right". And nuclear Iran is much lesser problem (for America) than nuclear Brazil, nuclear Mexico or nuclear Cuba.
The enemy of my enemy...
The enemy of your enemy is your next problem. They will turn on you instantly. It happened many times in history, even in the modern American history.
 
15th post
First of all, it were ayatollahs who were against acquiring nukes. Second, desire to acquire nukes is pretty sane and understandable. And secular part of Irainian society is much more pro-nuclear.


It's self-defense, and anybody would fight back when attacked on his own land, whatever nuclear or non-nuclear forces attacked him. And, giving the argument pro-sanity - they are allied with at least two nuclear powers - Russia and China, who are stronger than the USA and Israel.

For my secular and atheistic mindset the logic of Iranian ayatollahs is more justified, clear, rational and predictable than the logic of Zionists and American Evangelists & Satanists.
The bottom line is the ayatollahs' insane efforts to acquire nukes and their imperialist policies have brought them to their knees.
 
The bottom line is the ayatollahs' insane efforts to acquire nukes and their imperialist policies have brought them to their knees.
First of all, they didn't try to acquire nukes, and that's the root of their problems, because the only language Americans still understand is the language of nuclear deterrence. Second, if you don't alleviate, they (and not only they) will acquire nukes. And there is literally nothing you can do about it, short of immediate suicide, of course.
 
First of all, they didn't try to acquire nukes, and that's the root of their problems, because the only language Americans still understand is the language of nuclear deterrence. Second, if you don't alleviate, they (and not only they) will acquire nukes. And there is literally nothing you can do about it, short of immediate suicide, of course.
Everyone knows the ayatollahs have been trying to acquire nukes for decades, and it has nothing to do with defense. The ayatollahs want nukes to deter other countries from interfering with their imperialist ambitions in the ME. The ayatollahs are on their way out, and hopefully the new Iranian government will be more responsible and competent than the present government.
 
Everyone knows the ayatollahs have been trying to acquire nukes for decades, and it has nothing to do with defense.
"Everyone", who watch too much of western TV, and have no any alternative information sources, knows it. Those who were actually interested in Iranian political situation, knew that the picture is much more complicated.

There are ayatollahs, a bit retarded religious medieval clowns, who make their bet on "Muslim brotherhood" and who were perfectly afraid about such modern things as nukes. Actually, they saw them as "sin". After all, Islam is a modern and peaceful religion (especially comparing with Orthodox Christianity and Neolithic chtonic cults of Mother Wet Soil). And there were more progressive secular guys, who understand the logic of American aggressive foreign policy and the logic of nuclear deterrence, and who are free from all those "naive medieval moral restrictions about mass murders of personally innocent civilians"

The ayatollahs want nukes to deter other countries from interfering with their imperialist ambitions in the ME. The ayatollahs are on their way out, and hopefully the new Iranian government will be more responsible and competent than the present government.
Yep. They don't need nukes for some kind of suicidal mass murder. They need them for deterrence games. And those games are for more then one player. You can play it, too. Actually that's we are doing since 1949.
And new government will play those games, do you want it or no, because you, clowns, just eliminated the last obstacles on Iranian nuclear road.
 
Back
Top Bottom