Negotiations Have Ended

[Zavulon]

Free nuclear fuel is not controlling anything, its free fuel, duh.

Free cheese happens only in a mousetrap.
They may want their own fuel-producing industry.

The JCPOA would have expired anyway, and Iran was cheating on it. Trump said no nuclear weapons, and made it happen, you're welcome. Trump succeeded where the JCPOA falied.

No. Looks like Trump just destroyed NPT, and soon many more countries will acquire nukes.

We hit 17,000 targets. Human shields should not be used.

Anyway, it's just determined them to fight you.

There was an Israel, the EU didn't want them, the US didn't want them.
I don't know why they just didn't return to their original homes?

We don't "conquer" anything. We replace dangerous regimes with more peaceful regimes.

No. You are turning civilised countries in terroristic garbage piles.

 

[Zavulon]

Yes it means that they don't develop them, they don't need them. You keep missing the "free fuel" part.

Free fuel. Free fuel. Free fuel. Free fuel. Free fuel. Free fuel. Free fuel. Free fuel. Free fuel. Free fuel. Free fuel. Free fuel.
Free fuel. Free fuel. Free fuel. Free fuel. Free fuel. Free fuel. Free fuel. Free fuel. Free fuel. Free fuel. Free fuel. Free fuel.
Free fuel. Free fuel. Free fuel. Free fuel. Free fuel. Free fuel. Free fuel. Free fuel. Free fuel. Free fuel. Free fuel. Free fuel.
Free fuel. Free fuel. Free fuel. Free fuel. Free fuel. Free fuel. Free fuel. Free fuel. Free fuel. Free fuel. Free fuel. Free fuel.

You need high-octane gasoline for your roadster, and they suggested you coal for the stove.
Would you agree?

Do you have a link saying Iran would accept the free fuel offer for no enrichment? NO? Didn't think so.

They have right to develop their nuclear program (including enrichment) while it's not making bombs.

Did you have any signs that they were making bombs? And even if you think that you have such evidence, you shouldn't bomb anybody. You should bring it to four other "legal" nuclear states and then discuss. If they don't want Iran getting nukes (and they don't want it) - together they can coerce any country into anything. If they want Iran having nukes (and your illegal and unprovoked aggression might press them) - they will give nukes anyway (and all those bombing campaigns are useless).

 

[Ringo]

We don't "conquer" anything. We replace dangerous regimes with more peaceful regimes.

I understand that the U.S. was founded on hypocrisy and that its citizens are taught hypocrisy from birth, but why do you have to excel at this despicable practice?

 

[toomuchtime_]

Ayatollahs are not "government" in the narrow meaning of the word. They are "council of experts", who elect and partly control Supreme Leader. But you shouldn't overestimate his importance. Right now Iran is doing pretty well even, de facto, without him.


Of course it's not. There were a lot of violence even before 1979. The root cause for almost all the violence in the ME are Israel, Britain and the USA.

The ayatollahs are the government. The council of experts is made up of ayatollahs and while they can elect the supreme leader and remove him from office, while he is in office all government power is vested in him. It is impossible to overestimate his power. You may like to talk about secularism and atheism, but face it, you are supporting a theocracy.

Again, while Iran may be doing well on your planet, here on Earth Iran is teetering on the edge of disaster.

Everyplace in the ME where there is violence and conflict, Iran is sponsoring it.

 

[kyzr]

I understand that the U.S. was founded on hypocrisy and that its citizens are taught hypocrisy from birth, but why do you have to excel at this despicable practice?

So riddle me this...would you prefer to live in the US or EU or a country ruled by

Saddam
Qaddafi
Kohmeini
Assad
The Taliban

especially if you are a Christian.

 

[kyzr]

You need high-octane gasoline for your roadster, and they suggested you coal for the stove.
Would you agree?

Advanced weapons are much different than cheap electricity for the poor people, would you agree?
Free fuel. Free fuel. Free fuel. Free fuel. Free fuel. Free fuel. Free fuel. Free fuel. Free fuel. Free fuel. Free fuel. Free fuel.
Free fuel. Free fuel. Free fuel. Free fuel. Free fuel. Free fuel. Free fuel. Free fuel. Free fuel. Free fuel. Free fuel. Free fuel.
Free fuel. Free fuel. Free fuel. Free fuel. Free fuel. Free fuel. Free fuel. Free fuel. Free fuel. Free fuel. Free fuel. Free fuel.
Free fuel. Free fuel. Free fuel. Free fuel. Free fuel. Free fuel. Free fuel. Free fuel. Free fuel. Free fuel. Free fuel. Free fuel.

They have right to develop their nuclear program (including enrichment) while it's not making bombs.

Trump says "no" because we can't trust Iran.
Trump has the "right" to impose the NPT on dangerous state sponsors of terror to protect our national security.
The very same argument Putin uses to justify his invasion of Ukraine.

Did you have any signs that they were making bombs? And even if you think that you have such evidence, you shouldn't bomb anybody. You should bring it to four other "legal" nuclear states and then discuss. If they don't want Iran getting nukes (and they don't want it) - together they can coerce any country into anything. If they want Iran having nukes (and your illegal and unprovoked aggression might press them) - they will give nukes anyway (and all those bombing campaigns are useless).

Iran knows that we have at least two very serious threats if they continue to enrich, a naval blockade to deprive them of revenue, or more bombing to destroy their investments in nuclear weapons. You would think intelligent people would see that making weapons is the wrong decision.

 

[kyzr]

Free cheese happens only in a mousetrap.
They may want their own fuel-producing industry.

We don't care what they"want". They always "want" to spread terrorism. They "want" nuclear weapons, can't let that happen.

No. Looks like Trump just destroyed NPT, and soon many more countries will acquire nukes.

Trump just enforced the NPT by military means. Could happen to any country that wants them.

Anyway, it's just determined them to fight you.

LOL. Maybe a few mullahs are determined, but the military and the people do not.

No. You are turning civilised countries in terroristic garbage piles.

Lets see how that looks under closer inspection:
Iraq was barbaric under Saddam and his sadistic sons, now they are civilized
Syria was barbaric under the Assads, now it is a bit better
Afghanistan was a haven for Al-Qaeda, now its just a backward harmless country
Libya was a mess under Qaddafi, now it also is developing better
Iran was the most dangerous state sponsor of terror, sponsoring Hamas, Hezbollah and the Houthis, now it is being managed

Every country that was a vicious dictatorship is now much more innocuous.