Is carnivorism ethical?

[rupol2000]

In my opinion, this cannot be justified by logical means, because if you can eat someone else's meat, then someone else can eat your meat, therefore nothing prevents cannibalism. If you accept the point of view of a meat-eater, then you should not be indignant that someone ate your child.

 

[RetiredGySgt]

Good god keep proving how idiotic and stupid vegans are, Hymans are Omnivores we are designed to eat meat.

 

[rupol2000]

Hymans are Omnivores

This is a lie, our morphology and origin suggests that we are not predators, just part of humanity has degenerated to carnivor

 

[rupol2000]

Eating cows is a special meanness, because the cow is our mother, she gave milk to our ancestors free of charge.

 

[rupol2000]

Meat eaters kill those animals that have served people for thousands of years with faith and truth, who were friends both in peace and in war, who shed their blood (horses) for us, and they do not kill vile predatory creatures that at least would have received for their deeds if they would be killed.

 

[Darkwind]

In my opinion, this cannot be justified by logical means, because if you can eat someone else's meat, then someone else can eat your meat, therefore nothing prevents cannibalism. If you accept the point of view of a meat-eater, then you should not be indignant that someone ate your child.

Your opinion is wrong.

 

[rupol2000]

If you value predators, why then do you not value maniacs who kill and devour children and defenseless women? Aren't they your heroes modeled on their behavior?

 

[9thIDdoc]

In my opinion, this cannot be justified by logical means, because if you can eat someone else's meat, then someone else can eat your meat, therefore nothing prevents cannibalism. If you accept the point of view of a meat-eater, then you should not be indignant that someone ate your child.

Man is neither a carnivore (which eats meat only) nor a vegetarian (which eats plants only). Man is an omnivore meaning he eats both naturally. Living things typically must kill (either plants or animals: both are living things) to survive. Just reality. Deal with it.

 

[rupol2000]

an is an omnivore meaning he eats both naturally

This is idle talk, invented by the propaganda of predation, by moral monsters like Nietzsche. Man does not have the properties of a predator.

 

[rupol2000]

A noble person has the instinct to protect the victim of a predator and to kill the predator. The noble warrior is a predator-killing superpredator

 

[WinterBorn]

Eating cows is a special meanness, because the cow is our mother, she gave milk to our ancestors free of charge.

Gave? The cow did not "give" anything. The human raised her, fed her, sheltered her and bred her. Then the human TOOK the milk.

 

[WinterBorn]

Meat eaters kill those animals that have served people for thousands of years with faith and truth, who were friends both in peace and in war, who shed their blood (horses) for us, and they do not kill vile predatory creatures that at least would have received for their deeds if they would be killed.

Take a biology course.

Predators are not vile. They are a vital part of the cycle of life on this planet.

And it is good that meat eaters do not kill predators. There are far fewer predators than prey. The animals that are prey reproduce at a much high rate than predators. Again, it keeps things in balance.

Your fairy tale outlook on this is amusing, but far from the truth.

 

[WinterBorn]

If you value predators, why then do you not value maniacs who kill and devour children and defenseless women? Aren't they your heroes modeled on their behavior?

Because our society protects the weak. And what predatory animals kill and eat the young and the females of the species?

 

[Damaged Eagle]

Damn I'm getting hungry! I wonder how many cheeseburgers could be made out of that cow in the OP.

*****CHUCKLE*****

 

[WinterBorn]

A noble person has the instinct to protect the victim of a predator and to kill the predator. The noble warrior is a predator-killing superpredator

So you think we should fight predators to protect the prey? And what will control the population of the prey animals?

 

[rupol2000]

Gave? The cow did not "give" anything. The human raised her, fed her, sheltered her and bred her. Then the human TOOK the milk.

It is nonsense. The cows were originally wild and they gave people their milk.
There is some truth in your words: noble people protected cows from predators and grazed them on good pastures, in gratitude for this, but this does not apply to the bloody meat consumers who killed the holy animals, and now they do it on a production of bloody poison

 

[WinterBorn]

It is nonsense. The cows were originally wild and they gave people their milk.
There is some truth in your words: noble people protected cows from predators and grazed them on good pastures, in gratitude for this, but this does not apply to the bloody meat consumers who killed the holy animals, and now they do it on a production of bloody poison

Again, you use the word "gave". Do you think these wild cows walked up to humans and offered their milk?

 

[rupol2000]

So you think we should fight predators to protect the prey? And what will control the population of the prey animals?

Predators are not needed, they can all be killed. The herbivore population is regulated naturally, by the base of food in nature. No food no animals

 

[harmonica]

rupol2000 are you purposefully trying to sound ridiculous?

 

[RetiredGySgt]

Again, you use the word "gave". Do you think these wild cows walked up to humans and offered their milk?

He is delusional probably from a lack of vitamins from not eating meat.