Hm. Doesn't appear that ''clean debate'' is the intent in scope here, given quite a bit of the usual combative, antagonistic and inflammatory accusations invoked in synergy and directed toward other forum usership by the historical purveyors, observably, of that routine in these supposed ''clean debate'' / Zone 1 threads.
I'm reminded of the recently invoked ''misuse of clean debate'' charge in the feedbsck section, since starting these threads in the 'clean debate'' zone and then proceeding to take them in an antithetical direction with such blatantly non-conforming dialogue demonstrates intellectually dishonest intent. And that's not even considering the violations themselves. My goodness. The humorous irony of it all is humorous..
I tell ya. Some people...
Reported.
Do better, please.
Not everyone wants to wallow in mud. Otherwise there's no logic in even maintaining a ''clean debate'' section of the board.
Thanks!
And Rejoice! For He is risen...
View attachment 1240479