Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
He was liable for sexual battery, inserting his fingers into a woman who did not want it.LIAR
it was NOT rape
Damn... when will be rid of the egregious LIARS in our country?
Answer: When Jesus comes back and kicks ass... (Sorry, Jesus, but I presume you will something akin to that)
Do you need anything else? Parts for luxury yachts are an essential business. Why do you think yachts are essential?... and what else? Tell us what else.
I forgot all about you, but thanks for the reminder/——/ I thought you were blocking me. Need some help?
No he wasnt he was not found liable for rape read the damn thread retard.
Nope, playtime, sexual battery is not rape, the judge clarified, and your denial is maga-like playing into MAGA advantage.he raped her. it was a distinction without a differance.
the judge clarified why it was rape.
/---/ No need to thank me. I'm here to help you remedy all of your screw ups.I forgot all about you, but thanks for the reminder
Nope, playtime, sexual battery is not rape, the judge clarified, and your denial is maga-like playing into MAGA advantage.
not according to my info. The news I watch or pay attn to says it was NOT rape.he raped her. it was a distinction without a differance.
the judge clarified why it was rape.
The judge rule and it will not be re-litigated. You are wrong. And that's that for that.rape is the act - not the instrument used.
not according to my info. The news I watch or pay attn to says it was NOT rape.
The judge rule and it will not be re-litigated.
You are wrong.
And that's that for that.
He is explaining why your understanding of the term is incorrect.“The finding that Ms. Carroll failed to prove that she was ‘raped’ within the meaning of the New York Penal Law does not mean that she failed to prove that Mr. Trump ‘raped’ her as many people commonly understand the word ‘rape,’ ” Kaplan wrote.
He added: “Indeed, as the evidence at trial recounted below makes clear, the jury found that Mr. Trump in fact did exactly that.”
Kaplan said New York’s legal definition of “rape” is “far narrower” than the word is understood in “common modern parlance.”
Share this articleShare
The former requires forcible, unconsented-to penetration with one’s penis. But he said that the conduct the jury effectively found Trump liable for — forced digital penetration — meets a more common definition of rape. He cited definitions offered by the American Psychological Association and the Justice Department,which in 2012 expanded its definition of rape to include penetration “with any body part or object.”
You are wrong. Tough. That 'wrongness' does not translate into rectifying Trump's sexual sickness and actions.He is explaining why your understanding of the term is incorrect.
/-----/ From a thread started by MAGA MACHO Man:Judge clarifies: Yes, Trump was found to have raped E. Jean Carroll
July 19, 2023 at 1:15 p.m. EDT
He says that what the jury found Trump did was in fact rape, as commonly understood.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2023/07/19/trump-carroll-judge-rape/
www.thegatewaypundit.com
well the poor don't have the means.....what a social fucking disaster........these idiots will probably vote libturd wherever they move....they are dumb as hellmany people left the blue states.
Hopefully, most of them were rich so as to deprive the state of $$$
He is explaining why your understanding of the term is incorrect.
You are wrong.
Tough.
That 'wrongness' does not translate into rectifying Trump's sexual sickness and actions.
It was not legally rape.
I do feel your anger.
& now for truthful clarification.:/-----/ From a thread started by MAGA MACHO Man:
Under cross-examination by Trump’s lawyer Alina Habba, E. Jean Carroll admitted she deleted emails under subpoena. Judge Kaplan ran interference for Carroll.
Carroll admitted to deleting emails under subpoena because she didn’t want to upset her lawyers.
How is this not a criminal act? Why was she not charged with destroying evidence?
The Trump legal team is now calling for a mistrial in the E. Jean Carroll case after she admitted to deleting evidence.
Trump Team Renews Motion for Mistrial in E. Jean Carroll Defamation Case After She Deletes Emails that Exonerate Trump | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hoft
As Cristina Laila reported earlier – President Trump appeared in court on Wednesday as E.
Judge and Jury are the decider not the Playtimes. He is a sexual batter not a rapists. Platime's opinion is her own and the rest of us can laugh and go "sure."you played hookey the day reading comp was taught.
nope.
tough what? tough you don't get that the act of rape involves more than just one body part? in the 90's that was how the law was written. he raped her with his fingers. the lawsuit has to litigate what was on the books at the time of the crime.
BUT it has changed after that & had he attacked her after 2012 ... with his fingers.... then he would have been charged with rape.
He cited definitions offered by the American Psychological Association and the Justice Department,which in 2012 expanded its definition of rape to include penetration “with any body part or object.”
nothing he did is any different than rape, other than the timing.
what ... no smile?
