Anomalism
Diamond Member
- Dec 1, 2020
- 11,847
- 8,959
- 2,138
Why would God necessarily be obvious and self-evident? That seems like an assumption to me. Monotheism and holy books aren't the only interpretation of God. Assuming God must be self evident to exist is creating your own set of assumptions about what God must be.
Your argument is "If X existed, it would have property Y. X doesn't have property Y. Therefore X doesn't exist."
But you never justified why X must have property Y. You just asserted it.
"Self-evidence" as a necessary property of divinity is itself a theological claim. Why would that be true?
Your argument is "If X existed, it would have property Y. X doesn't have property Y. Therefore X doesn't exist."
But you never justified why X must have property Y. You just asserted it.
"Self-evidence" as a necessary property of divinity is itself a theological claim. Why would that be true?
Last edited:
