I Have A Legit Question To Leftists

The very second the governor of my state and other states started trying to stack the deck for republicans under the excuse of a supposedly stolen election. Now red state democrats will never be sure if their vote was even counted. Not that you care.
How have they stacked the deck? I've heard people say that about the Texas voter bill, and I asked someone to show me the provisions in the actual bill, not from an article on a website or news show, but show mw where they are suppressing votes, nobody responded.

I want to see the actual provisions in the bill that limit or suppress votes.
 
And now you know why we call you names and fight for voter and voting integrity.

You want to degrade both, you're going to get called names. Learn to live with it.
You don't want voting integrity. You want your vote to count more than mine. It's the only way republicans can retain power. Republicans have been shitting themselves over changing demographics for quite a while now. Rigging the system right in our faces is their solution.
 
It's almost a year since the theft on election night. The evidence is there, but the liberals don't want to admit it.


Agreed,.. they're the parrots. They'll keep repeating and screaming that there was no fraud until they're blue in the face no matter what kind of facts we present them with. :rolleyes:





I have a separate question for the left. Do you "really" want a "One-Political-Party" government, knowing that there has never been One-Party governments that weren't authoritarian, oppressive, persecutory, tyrannical and murderous (i.e., military juntas, theocracies, Communist, Old-Style Monarchies)? Because, that's what the hard-left wants.



Exactly. They contradict themselves with basically everything they say. :rolleyes:
 
You don't want voting integrity. You want your vote to count more than mine. It's the only way republicans can retain power. Republicans have been shitting themselves over changing demographics for quite a while now. Rigging the system right in our faces is their solution.
Refer to post #35.
 
The right hasn't started a war on democracy.....we're not even a democracy.
Fascists are very fond of saying that. We are a democracy because we elect our leaders with a (usually) orderly transfer of power. It's anyone's guess what we will be if the right manages to blow it up.
 
You don't want voting integrity. You want your vote to count more than mine. It's the only way republicans can retain power. Republicans have been shitting themselves over changing demographics for quite a while now. Rigging the system right in our faces is their solution.
Incorrect. when you promote uncontrolled voting with no accountability and promote a zero chain of control voting system, it is YOU who are canceling My vote and you can go fuck yourself as the anti-democratic POS that you are.


The ONLY way you can have integrity in our Democracy is to have accountability of who is voting, how they are voting, and if they have the legal right to vote. This means that from the moment a person registers to vote, right up to the point that the vote is counted, a chain of custody is maintained and is managed by people of integrity.

We all know any left-wing progressive has no integrity nor character.

It's what you do.
 
Another follow up question to my OP. Why do democrats say they're for a free country when they're beliefs lean more towards a socialist country?
 
Incorrect. when you promote uncontrolled voting with no accountability and promote a zero chain of control voting system, it is YOU who are canceling My vote and you can go fuck yourself as the anti-democratic POS that you are.


The ONLY way you can have integrity in our Democracy is to have accountability of who is voting, how they are voting, and if they have the legal right to vote. This means that from the moment a person registers to vote, right up to the point that the vote is counted, a chain of custody is maintained and is managed by people of integrity.

We all know any left-wing progressive has no integrity nor character.

It's what you do.
If all the digging and auditing and lawsuits had produced any evidence of MASSIVE voter fraud you would have an argument. The Big Lie is just a bunch of hogwash meant to supply the Excuse. Authoritarians always need a justification to rob people of their rights and lives.
 
If all the digging and auditing and lawsuits had produced any evidence of MASSIVE voter fraud you would have an argument. The Big Lie is just a bunch of hogwash meant to supply the Excuse. Authoritarians always need a justification to rob people of their rights and lives.



Producing evidence and not wanting to listen to the evidence produced isn't the same thing.
 
If all the digging and auditing and lawsuits had produced any evidence of MASSIVE voter fraud you would have an argument. The Big Lie is just a bunch of hogwash meant to supply the Excuse. Authoritarians always need a justification to rob people of their rights and lives.
Oh, Sweet Jesus, step back from the crack pipe! Have you EVER seriously looked at information from anything but MSM? NO, YOU HAVEN'T!
 
If all the digging and auditing and lawsuits had produced any evidence of MASSIVE voter fraud you would have an argument. The Big Lie is just a bunch of hogwash meant to supply the Excuse. Authoritarians always need a justification to rob people of their rights and lives.
There requires no argument to take steps to "PREVENT" fraud BEFORE it happens. That is why we have laws against fraud. Not because there is proof of it, but because we want to be sure to have a mechanism to punish it if it happens.

For something that is one of the most precious rights we have, a means to prevent fraud is MUCH more valuable than discovering minor incidents of it.

Otherwise, we end up with clowns who say that the gatekeepers in power say there is no fraud, dismiss real criminal conduct.

When elections are razor-thin, MASSIVE voter fraud isn't necessary. A thousand votes can swing an election.

We've seen evidence that questionable practices and procedures occured. We will never know if they made a difference or not. Why? Because those in power have the power to simply ignore it.

Regardless, that is no justification for ensuring that voting integrity is not enforced.

/thread
 
Producing evidence and not wanting to listen to the evidence produced isn't the same thing.
Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. If your "evidence" cannot convince a skeptic it's not really quality evidence is it? It's all made-up hogwash no reputable attorney would dare present in a court of law.
 
There requires no argument to take steps to "PREVENT" fraud BEFORE it happens. That is why we have laws against fraud. Not because there is proof of it, but because we want to be sure to have a mechanism to punish it if it happens.

For something that is one of the most precious rights we have, a means to prevent fraud is MUCH more valuable than discovering minor incidents of it.

Otherwise, we end up with clowns who say that the gatekeepers in power say there is no fraud, dismiss real criminal conduct.

When elections are razor-thin, MASSIVE voter fraud isn't necessary. A thousand votes can swing an election.

We've seen evidence that questionable practices and procedures occured. We will never know if they made a difference or not. Why? Because those in power have the power to simply ignore it.

Regardless, that is no justification for ensuring that voting integrity is not enforced.

/thread
You don't even care that the system being set up in some states allows politicians to meddle in elections in ways that verge on outright theft. You'll see it in the next election as millions of democratic votes get arbitrarily called fraudulent and thrown in the fire. It will be a fascist wet dream to get away with stealing an election right out in the open.
 
You don't even care that the system being set up in some states allows politicians to meddle in elections in ways that verge on outright theft. You'll see it in the next election as millions of democratic votes get arbitrarily called fraudulent and thrown in the fire. It will be a fascist wet dream to get away with stealing an election right out in the open.



So,.. what exactly is big enough evidence for you?
 
You don't even care that the system being set up in some states allows politicians to meddle in elections in ways that verge on outright theft. You'll see it in the next election as millions of democratic votes get arbitrarily called fraudulent and thrown in the fire. It will be a fascist wet dream to get away with stealing an election right out in the open.
yeah, because when the Democrats are doing it, you turn a blind eye.

peddle your lies elsewhere.


/thread
 

Forum List

Back
Top