I am especially pleased to be here

[IMDaugur]

On a message board full of neocon Bushbot loyalists, rubbing your Republican noses in the truth about your corrupt, greedy, bigoted, racist, Grand Old Party of hypocrisy. I look forward to the coming weeks as you get to read my posts reminding you of the last three decades of your love affair with the Reaganomics ponzi scheme and the financial collapse it has caused.
Your heroes Bush, Cheney, and their friends in the Republican controlled Congress during that administration screwed a full 98% of the American population, and you cheered them on. Out of the last thirty two years Democrats have raised the national debt a mere $1.7 trillion dollars, while the fiscal conservatives (that's you Republicans) have pumped it up by over $7.7 trillion dollars. WOW! Aren't you guys proud of that? In case you want to dispute those numbers, the proof is available on line. The fact that Dubya and Dick cooked the books and their true contribution to that debt has been under reported should make you feel even warmer inside. Enjoy.

 

[Diuretic]

Wrong place, you want the next one over, the one with all the blue stuff

Hard core leftists have taken over, Gunny hasnt caught up yet

 

[IMDaugur]

Wrong place, you want the next one over, the one with all the blue stuff

Hard core leftists have taken over, Gunny hasnt caught up yet

I know, you guys hate to read truth, but that is all you will get when reading my posts.

 

[strollingbones]

where the fuck do these idiots come from? i know gunny is saying we need to be nicer to the newbie...but damn gunny..i am a liberal and dont care for this shit....i love people who claim to know the truth....they are like the people who know the only true god blah blah blah blah blah blah

 

[editec]

No need to rub their noses into it, dude.

When the party faithful started telling us that their boy BUSH II turned out to be a socialist, their noses were already so far bent out of shape that nothing YOU can possibly say can possibly hurt them more than their own realization that they were lied to.

 

[Diuretic]

Wrong place, you want the next one over, the one with all the blue stuff

Hard core leftists have taken over, Gunny hasnt caught up yet

I know, you guys hate to read truth, but that is all you will get when reading my posts.

I can hardly wait

 

[Mad Scientist]

That's funny, cause I was just thinking that I am especially pleased to be here on a message board full of Left Wing, America Hating loyalists, rubbing their Democrat noses in the truth about their corrupt, greedy, bigoted, racist, Democrat hypocrisy. I look forward to the coming weeks as you get to read my posts reminding you of the last three decades of your love affair with the Carternomics of the Misery Index, and borrowing trillions from future generations by Obama, Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid the financial collapse it will cause..

Your hero Obama and his friends in the Democrat controlled Congress during this administration has screwed a full 100% of the American population, and you are cheering them on. All the while Obama will be doubling the National Debt. WOW! Aren't you guys proud of that? In case you want to dispute those numbers, the proof is available on line here:
CBO: Obama's budget would double national debt over decade

And the fact that Barney Frank(D) and Cris Dodd(D) have cooked the books at Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, their true contribution to that debt has been under reported and should make you feel even warmer inside. Enjoy.

 

[Diuretic]

That's funny, cause I was just thinking that I am especially pleased to be here on a message board full of Left Wing, America Hating loyalists, rubbing their Democrat noses in the truth about their corrupt, greedy, bigoted, racist, Democrat hypocrisy. I look forward to the coming weeks as you get to read my posts reminding you of the last three decades of your love affair with the Carternomics of the Misery Index, and borrowing trillions from future generations by Obama, Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid the financial collapse it will cause..

Your hero Obama and his friends in the Democrat controlled Congress during this administration has screwed a full 100% of the American population, and you are cheering them on. All the while Obama will be doubling the National Debt. WOW! Aren't you guys proud of that? In case you want to dispute those numbers, the proof is available on line here:
CBO: Obama's budget would double national debt over decade

And the fact that Barney Frank(D) and Cris Dodd(D) have cooked the books at Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, their true contribution to that debt has been under reported and should make you feel even warmer inside. Enjoy.

[/QUOTE]

"Fact"

You only deal in slogans you wouldn't know a fact if it bit you on the dick

 

[Midnight Marauder]

Welcome to USMB, you'll feel right at home spewing the same regurgitated spoon fed talking points as other leftist partisans. It's good for you that facts and truth matter not to you, just keep deluding yourself and attempting to delude others. Goebbels-style "say it loud enough and long enough and the lie becomes the truth" propaganda only gets one just so far today, despite the great leap in technology since the 30s.

 

[Ravi]

I think he's a paid RNC poster.

 

[Diuretic]

I think he's a paid RNC poster.

He'll earn his money then

 

[Iriemon]

On a message board full of neocon Bushbot loyalists, rubbing your Republican noses in the truth about your corrupt, greedy, bigoted, racist, Grand Old Party of hypocrisy. I look forward to the coming weeks as you get to read my posts reminding you of the last three decades of your love affair with the Reaganomics ponzi scheme and the financial collapse it has caused.
Your heroes Bush, Cheney, and their friends in the Republican controlled Congress during that administration screwed a full 98% of the American population, and you cheered them on. Out of the last thirty two years Democrats have raised the national debt a mere $1.7 trillion dollars, while the fiscal conservatives (that's you Republicans) have pumped it up by over $7.7 trillion dollars. WOW! Aren't you guys proud of that? In case you want to dispute those numbers, the proof is available on line. The fact that Dubya and Dick cooked the books and their true contribution to that debt has been under reported should make you feel even warmer inside. Enjoy.

It's not quite a fair comparison, because they had different starting places.

Reagan inhereted a $72B deficit, and left Bush1 a $194B deficit.

Bush1 took that and left Clinton a $340B deficit.

Clinton inherited that, and left Bush2 a $87B surplus.

Bush2 took that surplus and left Obama a $638B deficit (in a year the Govt actually borrowed over $1 trillion).

Clinton was the only one who improved the budget he was give, and reversed the deficit policies he inhereted from a Republican, leaving his successor the rare gift of a surplus.

So if we want to be fair about it, just call it the "Republican debt". That's a fairly accurate description of what it is.

 

[Midnight Marauder]

On a message board full of neocon Bushbot loyalists, rubbing your Republican noses in the truth about your corrupt, greedy, bigoted, racist, Grand Old Party of hypocrisy. I look forward to the coming weeks as you get to read my posts reminding you of the last three decades of your love affair with the Reaganomics ponzi scheme and the financial collapse it has caused.
Your heroes Bush, Cheney, and their friends in the Republican controlled Congress during that administration screwed a full 98% of the American population, and you cheered them on. Out of the last thirty two years Democrats have raised the national debt a mere $1.7 trillion dollars, while the fiscal conservatives (that's you Republicans) have pumped it up by over $7.7 trillion dollars. WOW! Aren't you guys proud of that? In case you want to dispute those numbers, the proof is available on line. The fact that Dubya and Dick cooked the books and their true contribution to that debt has been under reported should make you feel even warmer inside. Enjoy.

It's not quite a fair comparison, because they had different starting places.

Reagan inhereted a $72B deficit, and left Bush1 a $194B deficit.

Bush1 took that and left Clinton a $340B deficit.

Clinton inherited that, and left Bush2 a $87B surplus.

Bush2 took that surplus and left Obama a $638B deficit (in a year the Govt actually borrowed over $1 trillion).

Clinton was the only one who improved the budget he was give, and reversed the deficit policies he inhereted from a Republican, leaving his successor the rare gift of a surplus.

So if we want to be fair about it, just call it the "Republican debt". That's a fairly accurate description of what it is.

Except, according to the CBO the Clinton "surplus" never existed. In fact, by 1999 there was a budget deficit of over a billion already.

Clinton's low deficit was due mostly to legislation which the Supreme Court ruled unconstitutional. Little picky things the GOP Congress gave him, like line-item veto, Gramm-Rudman, Paygo....

Idiots who give way too much credit to a POTUS when things go right are only slightly out done by the idiocy of those who give way too much criticism when they don't -- and who conveniently forget it's CONGRESS who has the real purse-string power. The POTUS really has very little power and even less control.

 

[xotoxi]

Welcome, IMDaugur!!!

I hope you enjoy your time here.

As long as you tone down your douchebaggery, you'll get along with pretty much everyone here, both libs and cons.

But if you keep up with the tone of your first post...then consider yourself our meal, because we will consume you and shit you out.

Have fun!

 

[Iriemon]

On a message board full of neocon Bushbot loyalists, rubbing your Republican noses in the truth about your corrupt, greedy, bigoted, racist, Grand Old Party of hypocrisy. I look forward to the coming weeks as you get to read my posts reminding you of the last three decades of your love affair with the Reaganomics ponzi scheme and the financial collapse it has caused.
Your heroes Bush, Cheney, and their friends in the Republican controlled Congress during that administration screwed a full 98% of the American population, and you cheered them on. Out of the last thirty two years Democrats have raised the national debt a mere $1.7 trillion dollars, while the fiscal conservatives (that's you Republicans) have pumped it up by over $7.7 trillion dollars. WOW! Aren't you guys proud of that? In case you want to dispute those numbers, the proof is available on line. The fact that Dubya and Dick cooked the books and their true contribution to that debt has been under reported should make you feel even warmer inside. Enjoy.

It's not quite a fair comparison, because they had different starting places.

Reagan inhereted a $72B deficit, and left Bush1 a $194B deficit.

Bush1 took that and left Clinton a $340B deficit.

Clinton inherited that, and left Bush2 a $87B surplus.

Bush2 took that surplus and left Obama a $638B deficit (in a year the Govt actually borrowed over $1 trillion).

Clinton was the only one who improved the budget he was give, and reversed the deficit policies he inhereted from a Republican, leaving his successor the rare gift of a surplus.

So if we want to be fair about it, just call it the "Republican debt". That's a fairly accurate description of what it is.

Except, according to the CBO the Clinton "surplus" never existed. In fact, by 1999 there was a budget deficit of over a billion already.

You might want to consider getting your information from new sources if that is what you are being informed.

You can check CBO data here: Congressional Budget Office - Historical Budget Data

Table 1 contains budget surplus/deficit data.

If you still want to defend your assertion after doing so we can discuss.

 

[catzmeow]

On a message board full of neocon Bushbot loyalists, rubbing your Republican noses in the truth about your corrupt, greedy, bigoted, racist, Grand Old Party of hypocrisy. I look forward to the coming weeks as you get to read my posts reminding you of the last three decades of your love affair with the Reaganomics ponzi scheme and the financial collapse it has caused.
Your heroes Bush, Cheney, and their friends in the Republican controlled Congress during that administration screwed a full 98% of the American population, and you cheered them on. Out of the last thirty two years Democrats have raised the national debt a mere $1.7 trillion dollars, while the fiscal conservatives (that's you Republicans) have pumped it up by over $7.7 trillion dollars. WOW! Aren't you guys proud of that? In case you want to dispute those numbers, the proof is available on line. The fact that Dubya and Dick cooked the books and their true contribution to that debt has been under reported should make you feel even warmer inside. Enjoy.

All politics aside (I'm no fan of Bush), I look forward to you having a new asshole ripped out for you to release some of that pent up bullshit with which you are clearly full until bursting at the seams. Your tone, alone, shows that you need to be fisted by a large black man with huge knuckles until you learn your place in the food chain.

 

[Sky Dancer]

Wrong place, you want the next one over, the one with all the blue stuff

Hard core leftists have taken over, Gunny hasnt caught up yet

I know, you guys hate to read truth, but that is all you will get when reading my posts.

Welcome aboard--

You look as though you're a lively addition.

 

[Midnight Marauder]

It's not quite a fair comparison, because they had different starting places.

Reagan inhereted a $72B deficit, and left Bush1 a $194B deficit.

Bush1 took that and left Clinton a $340B deficit.

Clinton inherited that, and left Bush2 a $87B surplus.

Bush2 took that surplus and left Obama a $638B deficit (in a year the Govt actually borrowed over $1 trillion).

Clinton was the only one who improved the budget he was give, and reversed the deficit policies he inhereted from a Republican, leaving his successor the rare gift of a surplus.

So if we want to be fair about it, just call it the "Republican debt". That's a fairly accurate description of what it is.

Except, according to the CBO the Clinton "surplus" never existed. In fact, by 1999 there was a budget deficit of over a billion already.

You might want to consider getting your information from new sources if that is what you are being informed.

You can check CBO data here: Congressional Budget Office - Historical Budget Data

Table 1 contains budget surplus/deficit data.

If you still want to defend your assertion after doing so we can discuss.

You are confusing public debt (National Debt) with the budget actuals. They're two different things entirely. Clinton's projected surpluses never materialized. It's a popular myth however, that they did. To alleviate your confusion, study that spreadsheet further and do some simple math.

 

[Iriemon]

Except, according to the CBO the Clinton "surplus" never existed. In fact, by 1999 there was a budget deficit of over a billion already.

You might want to consider getting your information from new sources if that is what you are being informed.

You can check CBO data here: Congressional Budget Office - Historical Budget Data

Table 1 contains budget surplus/deficit data.

If you still want to defend your assertion after doing so we can discuss.

You are confusing public debt (National Debt) with the budget actuals. They're two different things entirely. Clinton's projected surpluses never materialized. It's a popular myth however, that they did. To alleviate your confusion, study that spreadsheet further and do some simple math.

No I'm not confusing anything. I'll clarify futher.

Your assertion:

"according to the CBO the Clinton "surplus" never existed. In fact, by 1999 there was a budget deficit of over a billion already."

The CBO reports historical actual budget information in its website here:

http://cbo.gov/ftpdocs/99xx/doc9957/Historicaltables09-web.XLS

Table 1 reports summary budget information, including two measures of the deficit (or surplus). "Total" includes SS surplus tax receipts, and "on-budget" does not (and is therefore the more accurate measure.

Follow the table down to the year "2000" and in the third column you can find that the "on-budget" surplus for 2000 was 86.4 billion. In 1999, there was a 1.9 billion surplus.

Your assertion that according to the CBO there was a defict is simply inaccurate. It is plain for anyone to see that in 1999 and 2000 the CBO in fact recorded a surplus.

According to the CBO, the deficit was $340.4 billion the year before Clinton took office, and when he left office there was a 86.4 billion surplus when he left.

And if you want to measure it the way the Bush administration does, use the "Total" column and the surpluses for '99 and '00 were $125 billion and $236 billion, respectively.

Anyone can compare the deficits under Reagan, Bush and Bush versus Clinton and figure out which administrations policies where responsible for the $11 trillion debt.

 

[onecut39]

Your hero Obama and his friends in the Democrat controlled Congress during this administration has screwed a full 100% of the American population, and you are cheering them on. All the while Obama will be doubling the National Debt. WOW! Aren't you guys proud of that? In case you want to dispute those numbers, the proof is available on line here:
.

Bush doubled the national debt in eight years. Of the ten plus trillion in debt, Reagan, Bush 1 and Dubya are responsible for over eight trillion.

When a conservative talks about money, why is there not hysterical laughter?