How many times has humanity been wiped down to near extinction?

I forget where I read it but based upon the orientation of the Sphinx, it’s either 12,000 or 36,000 years old. The assumption was that it’s oriented to face the constellation Leo

The builders of the Sphinx and Giza were technologically advanced, that’s indisputable

Actually, we were in the Younger Dryas 12,000 years ago, so 36,000 YBP is more likely
 

Graham Hancock on India’s real age, Kali Yuga, Underwater cities, Ram Setu & Ancient India Mysteries​

May 13, 2026
1779620873743.webp

 
From Wiki, Trained archaeologists continue to make me SMH. It's only "Controversial" because it upsets the official incorrect narrative

The "underwater pyramids of Cuba" refer to a controversial discovery made in 2001 off the Guanahacabibes Peninsula. Using advanced sonar, researchers detected organized, symmetrical stone structures and pyramid-like formations at extreme depths of approximately 650 meters (over 2,100 feet). [1, 2]

The Discovery and Theories
In 2001, a team led by marine engineer Paulina Zalitsky and her husband Paul Weinzweig surveyed the area for the Cuban government and a Canadian exploration firm. Using a remotely operated vehicle (ROV), they captured footage of massive, smooth, granite-like blocks arranged in pyramids, circular shapes, and corridors. [1, 2, 3]

  • The Age: Some researchers theorized these structures were built over 6,000 years ago, which would predate the Egyptian pyramids.
  • The Atlantis Connection: Speculation quickly grew that the site could be a lost city, or even the mythical Atlantis.
  • The Sinking: One theory suggests a massive tectonic event and a subsequent shift in the Earth's fault lines submerged the land bridge and the city to its current deep-water resting place. [1, 2]

Skepticism and Scientific Consensus
Despite the initial fascination, the scientific and geological communities remain highly skeptical. Mainstream archaeologists and geologists point out several major issues with the lost-city theory: [1, 2, 3]
  • The Depth: Sinking a city to over 2,000 feet would require massive tectonic subduction that generally takes millions of years, not a sudden earthquake.
  • Natural Formations: Many geologists believe the symmetrical shapes could be natural limestone formations (similar to other underwater anomalies like the Yonaguni Monument in Japan).
  • Lack of Peer-Reviewed Evidence: The discovery has not been backed by verifiable rock samples or rigorous archaeological excavations. [1, 2, 3]
Since the initial expeditions, follow-up research has been sparse, largely due to the prohibitive depth, lack of funding, and logistical challenges. To learn more about the 2001 expedition and the geometric formations discovered: [1]
For a detailed look at the 2001 sonar data and the footage of the geometric anomalies found off Cuba's western coast:
 
From Wiki, Trained archaeologists continue to make me SMH. It's only "Controversial" because it upsets the official incorrect narrative

The "underwater pyramids of Cuba" refer to a controversial discovery made in 2001 off the Guanahacabibes Peninsula. Using advanced sonar, researchers detected organized, symmetrical stone structures and pyramid-like formations at extreme depths of approximately 650 meters (over 2,100 feet). [1, 2]

The Discovery and Theories
In 2001, a team led by marine engineer Paulina Zalitsky and her husband Paul Weinzweig surveyed the area for the Cuban government and a Canadian exploration firm. Using a remotely operated vehicle (ROV), they captured footage of massive, smooth, granite-like blocks arranged in pyramids, circular shapes, and corridors. [1, 2, 3]

  • The Age: Some researchers theorized these structures were built over 6,000 years ago, which would predate the Egyptian pyramids.
  • The Atlantis Connection: Speculation quickly grew that the site could be a lost city, or even the mythical Atlantis.
  • The Sinking: One theory suggests a massive tectonic event and a subsequent shift in the Earth's fault lines submerged the land bridge and the city to its current deep-water resting place. [1, 2]

Skepticism and Scientific Consensus
Despite the initial fascination, the scientific and geological communities remain highly skeptical. Mainstream archaeologists and geologists point out several major issues with the lost-city theory: [1, 2, 3]
  • The Depth: Sinking a city to over 2,000 feet would require massive tectonic subduction that generally takes millions of years, not a sudden earthquake.
  • Natural Formations: Many geologists believe the symmetrical shapes could be natural limestone formations (similar to other underwater anomalies like the Yonaguni Monument in Japan).
  • Lack of Peer-Reviewed Evidence: The discovery has not been backed by verifiable rock samples or rigorous archaeological excavations. [1, 2, 3]
Since the initial expeditions, follow-up research has been sparse, largely due to the prohibitive depth, lack of funding, and logistical challenges. To learn more about the 2001 expedition and the geometric formations discovered: [1]
For a detailed look at the 2001 sonar data and the footage of the geometric anomalies found off Cuba's western coast:
IMG_3696.webp
 
Just started listening to this one. It will probably take me a sitting or two to get through, assuming the first twenty minutes are interesting.

The Basement: Luke Caverns | How One Mistranslated Number Has Hidden Atlantis for Centuries​

May 27, 2026
Luke Caverns is an anthropologist and explorer who's mapped over 80 ancient archaeological sites using LIDAR — sites that don't appear on any map. His grandfather found and lost seven gold mines in New Mexico. Luke found them again.

Now he's planning the largest LIDAR scan ever done in the Amazon. We also go deep into Alexander the Great's missing body, the Were Jaguar cults of the Olmecs, and the Minoan civilization that may have been Atlantis.
1779936130196.webp


1779936166666.webp
 
I am beginning to think the large footprints found all over the world are the proof of remaining Nephilim that survived the global flood, and folks that claim they are big hairy arthropods are naught but purposeful disinformation. There has to be a reason they have never been photos or videos of them. I did not know that the Native Americans just thought they were giants and not animals, not hairy.

It's got me wondering why the Ethiopian Church still uses the books of Enoch, but in the rest of the west, it was taken out. And when? When was it removed from cannon?


Joe Rogan Experience #2502 - David Paulides​

May 20, 2026 The Joe Rogan Experience
David Paulides is a writer, investigator, filmmaker, and former law enforcement officer. He is the author of the “Missing 411” series, which explores unexplained disappearances in North American wilderness and national parks, as well as several books about Bigfoot. His latest films, “American Sasquatch” and “Missing 411: National Parks - Washington State,” are available on most streaming platforms.







The Secret History of Biblical Giants, Demons, and the Advanced Civilizations Before the Great Flood​

May 29, 2026 The Tucker Carlson Show

Genesis 6 describes the Nephilim as demonic hybrids who occupy positions of authority in human society. They’re entirely real, says Father Stephen De Young. The V. Rev. Dr. Stephen De Young is Pastor of Archangel Gabriel Orthodox Church (http://stgabriellafayette.org/) in Lafayette, Louisiana. He holds Master's degrees in theology, philosophy, humanities, and social sciences, and a Ph.D. in Biblical Studies from Amridge University. Fr. Stephen is also the host of the Whole Counsel of God (http://www.ancientfaith.com/podcasts/... from Ancient Faith and author of six books: The Religion of the Apostles, God is a Man of War, The Whole Counsel of God, Apocrypha, Saint Paul the Pharisee, and the Baal Book. He co-hosts the live call-in show and podcast Lord of Spirits (https://www.ancientfaith.com/podcasts... Fr. Andrew Stephen Damick.



 
I could be wrong, but I am under the impression that the Roman Church removed Enoch at one of the Nicene councils? Around 1100?
 
It isn't cannon to most Jewish sects either to my knowledge. Did the Roman Church even need to remove it, or was it already suppressed at that point?
 
I really don't know, that's just my understanding from years back.
Nor do I. I studied the academic analysis and all the interests at play at the Council of Nicaea at university, so that is why I was wondering this question. I can't find the answer to this query any where on-line.
 

“NEW Evidence!” - Randall Carlson on Ancient History’s Most LOST Civilization & Catastrophes | 430​

Jun 2, 2026
1780488155870.webp

 
15th post
I'd like to say I'm surprised there is no thread in the Conspiracy Sub-Forum on Tartaria, but I'm not, not really.




This one is as wild as the birds aren't real. But I can't say this one isn't true.


I’ve come across Tartaria a few times now

There’s Bully Slayer on YouTube who covers the Mud Flood Catastrophe

Going to look at David Icke on the subject

More and more it feels like The Matrix was a documentary
 
I am amused and rather concerned that so many individuals hold such cuckoo ideas.

The late Glyn Daniel, an archaeologist and one time editor of the journal Antiquity regularly mocked various quaint beliefs that were doing the rounds in the late 1960s and 1970s. Von Däniken is probably the most well known example of nonsensical claims and pseudo-science.

I remember reading Prof. Daniel's hilarious comments on a claim that Innuits in stone (!) canoes sailed to Wales and helped in the transportation of the bluestones to Stonehenge.

It seems that the situation has only got worse in the intervening 50 years or so.

And who seriously gives Graham Hancock any credence?
 
It’s not in the Torah or Zohar

I believe it’s only in the Ethiopian Bible
I'm aware of that as well.

. . but, what I am not aware of, is when the books of Jewish religious scripture were settled on and who settled that. Enoch was found with the dead sea scrolls. . . why?
 
Back
Top Bottom