What's new
US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

How is that Man Made Global Warming workin’ out for ya?

Sunsettommy

Diamond Member
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Mar 19, 2018
Messages
9,058
Reaction score
6,570
Points
2,050
and so?>>>

It is a short cooling trend that could change next year back to a new warming trend, but if it last another year, that is very bad for warmist/alarmists since it is supposed to warm .30C/decade it will not be close to that number at all.

However with the over reliance of a trace gas being the chosen driver of warming trends and since it is increasing every year, it should ALWAYS be warming but of course it doesn't, that is one of the reasons why the AGW is a failure.

Another failure is the postulated warm forcing increase effect is minimal at the 430 ppm level and dropping minimal to non existent level into the near future, therefore it doesn't have the ability to promote warming at all NOW!
 

RobbinBobbin

Active Member
Joined
Feb 23, 2021
Messages
40
Reaction score
4
Points
31
Location
United States of America
and so?>>>

It is a short cooling trend that could change next year back to a new warming trend, but if it last another year, that is very bad for warmist/alarmists since it is supposed to warm .30C/decade it will not be close to that number at all.

However with the over reliance of a trace gas being the chosen driver of warming trends and since it is increasing every year, it should ALWAYS be warming but of course it doesn't, that is one of the reasons why the AGW is a failure.

Another failure is the postulated warm forcing increase effect is minimal at the 430 ppm level and dropping minimal to non existent level into the near future, therefore it doesn't have the ability to promote warming at all NOW!
You should be right!
 

Prof.Lunaphiles

Platinum Member
Joined
Jan 13, 2020
Messages
1,832
Reaction score
1,127
Points
938
Location
Transient

Concerned American

Diamond Member
Joined
Dec 5, 2020
Messages
5,834
Reaction score
6,047
Points
1,893
Location
In your head
Another conservative who doesn't understand the difference between weather and climate.
I think I get it.

Climate and weather are like gender and sex. Climate is the equivalent of gender and weather is the equivalent of sex.

So we can change the weather of Mother Nature but not her/his/its climate.

Right?

Just trying to relate. Also, should mother nature begin to take those hormone treatments, or will simply taxing us with enough vigor save the planet?
Another attempt at population control. Don't grab that banana--you'll get blasted with the fire hose. Better yet--cut the firehose and eat the banana while the oppressor tries to plug the hose.
 

Crick

Gold Member
Joined
May 10, 2014
Messages
15,770
Reaction score
1,731
Points
290
Location
N/A
I don't see your cooling here. The Polar Vortex is simply one cycle of a Rossby wave in the jetstream. Rossby waves are caused by a reduction in the temperature difference between the equator and the poles. Thus, they are being brought into existence by the extraordinary warming taking place at our poles as part of global warming. There is no global cooling going on. Warming is still taking place and that is what is causing Arctic air masses to descend into the central US.

1615863502574.png
 

Sunsettommy

Diamond Member
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Mar 19, 2018
Messages
9,058
Reaction score
6,570
Points
2,050
I don't see your cooling here. The Polar Vortex is simply one cycle of a Rossby wave in the jetstream. Rossby waves are caused by a reduction in the temperature difference between the equator and the poles. Thus, they are being brought into existence by the extraordinary warming taking place at our poles as part of global warming. There is no global cooling going on. Warming is still taking place and that is what is causing Arctic air masses to descend into the central US.

View attachment 468187

I don't see your link and your chart is an Anomaly, smoothed and adjusted, it is GARBAGE!

Here is PISS only chart showing that it has been cooling since late 2015, using only raw temperature data:

1615869257355.png


LINK

Running mean shows that it cooled since late 2015.

1615869323505.png


LINK

======

Stop posting your misleading crap!
 

Sunsettommy

Diamond Member
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Mar 19, 2018
Messages
9,058
Reaction score
6,570
Points
2,050

Your link is misleading and dishonest with a lot of scaremongering statements in it. They are vague on the target dates as well and failed to provide the name of the study and the link to it.

I looked for it using Google, finally found it:

A multimillion-year-old record of Greenland vegetation and glacial history preserved in sediment beneath 1.4 km of ice at Camp Century

Will not take it seriously.
 
Last edited:

Billy_Bob

Diamond Member
Joined
Sep 4, 2014
Messages
25,557
Reaction score
12,538
Points
1,430
Location
Top Of The Great Divide

jc456

Diamond Member
Joined
Dec 18, 2013
Messages
96,375
Reaction score
11,491
Points
2,030
Another conservative who doesn't understand the difference between weather and climate.
it's cold in the winter, that's called climate. We're waiting on where the warm is that changed that fact. post that up for us.
 

jc456

Diamond Member
Joined
Dec 18, 2013
Messages
96,375
Reaction score
11,491
Points
2,030
"The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) officially reported that during February, the average contiguous U.S. temperature was 30.6°F, 3.2°F below the 20th-century average.

This ranked as the 19th-coldest February in the 127-year period of record and was the coldest February since 1989."


Mother Nature Still In Control: U.S. Had Coldest February In Over 30 Years | Climate Change Dispatch
climate of the season, winter. I got a feeling you'll mention Australia.
 

Crick

Gold Member
Joined
May 10, 2014
Messages
15,770
Reaction score
1,731
Points
290
Location
N/A

Crick

Gold Member
Joined
May 10, 2014
Messages
15,770
Reaction score
1,731
Points
290
Location
N/A
"The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) officially reported that during February, the average contiguous U.S. temperature was 30.6°F, 3.2°F below the 20th-century average.

This ranked as the 19th-coldest February in the 127-year period of record and was the coldest February since 1989."


Mother Nature Still In Control: U.S. Had Coldest February In Over 30 Years | Climate Change Dispatch

You KNOW that quoting US contiguous temperatures is worthless. Here:

The February 2021 global surface temperature was 1.17°F (0.65°C) above the 20th-century average of 53.9°F (12.1°C). This was the smallest February temperature departure since 2014 and the 16th highest for February in the 142-year record.
.
 

Crick

Gold Member
Joined
May 10, 2014
Messages
15,770
Reaction score
1,731
Points
290
Location
N/A
It hit 93 here yesterday and will do the same again today. Neither point has any significance. The CO2 levels, sea levels and global temperatures continues to rise.
 

Sunsettommy

Diamond Member
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Mar 19, 2018
Messages
9,058
Reaction score
6,570
Points
2,050
It hit 93 here yesterday and will do the same again today. Neither point has any significance. The CO2 levels, sea levels and global temperatures continues to rise.

So what, it was 90 at my city, tomorrow it is forecasted top be around 67 tomorrow, after a big wind tonight bringing it in, now I know why CO2 is going to fail tomorrow it got blown away....

Aaaand CO2 is a negligible factor of the observed warming, that is something even warmist scientists agrees on, which you ignore over and over.

The world doing better than ever because it has warmed up since the ending of the LIA.
 

Crick

Gold Member
Joined
May 10, 2014
Messages
15,770
Reaction score
1,731
Points
290
Location
N/A
I put people on ignore when they consistently post really stupid comments. Anyone discussing transient, localized phenomena in a discussion of GLOBAL warming is making such a comment.
 

Sunsettommy

Diamond Member
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Mar 19, 2018
Messages
9,058
Reaction score
6,570
Points
2,050
I put people on ignore when they consistently post really stupid comments. Anyone discussing transient, localized phenomena in a discussion of GLOBAL warming is making such a comment.

No you put me on ignore because you didn't want to be put on the spot for your lack of posting links for misleading charts you love to post and that copyright and forum rules require links. You have been reported a lot lately for it, that is WHY you put me on ignore.

You will always ignore it for time to come because it wrecks your CO2 delusions effectively. It is why so many here think you are a shill for a belief that is long shown to be absurd. CO2 simply doesn't have that level of warm forcing power at at the 425 ppm level

"Aaaand CO2 is a negligible factor of the observed warming, that is something even warmist scientists agrees on, which you ignore over and over."

Post one was a about weather event then attacked MAN MADE global warming claims over it, that was all, he didn't attack global warming itself, just the Mann made part...... a distinction you can't handle since humans contribute so little to the yearly increase, around 3% of the yearly total.

Here is an example with a link too:

EIA: U.S. CO2 Emissions Declined 11% in 2020 – No Change in Rising Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide

That is how little humans contribution to the total is, too small to show up statistically.

You can go and ignore me, but many here know why I am on the right side of the argument, even the few who at times argue with me know I am a proper climate realist.
 

Crick

Gold Member
Joined
May 10, 2014
Messages
15,770
Reaction score
1,731
Points
290
Location
N/A
It hit 93 here yesterday and will do the same again today. Neither point has any significance. The CO2 levels, sea levels and global temperatures continues to rise.

So what, it was 90 at my city, tomorrow it is forecasted top be around 67 tomorrow, after a big wind tonight bringing it in, now I know why CO2 is going to fail tomorrow it got blown away....

Aaaand CO2 is a negligible factor of the observed warming, that is something even warmist scientists agrees on, which you ignore over and over.

The world doing better than ever because it has warmed up since the ending of the LIA.

Show us a link supporting your claim that "warmist" scientists believe CO2 to be a negligible factor.
 

USMB Server Goals

Total amount
$20.00
Goal
$350.00

Most reactions - Past 7 days

Forum List

Top